Progressives scrambles to block potential Supreme Court nominee Amy C. Barrett because she is a ...

[RetiredGySgt]

we have a First Amendment.

We wouldn't if Hillary had been elected and installed another Kagan type Marxist.

We don't take our representatives to Government seriously about morals, once they enter public office, only politics and the law.

Your fellow Communists demand that a religious test be administered so that no Christian may serve on the court.

Such bullshit. There is no "religious test", just a search for assurances that a justice will not bring his or her religion into the court room and decisions that affect all Americans. Justice Sotomayor is a Christian, even graduating from Cardinal Spellman High School.

Please get off of this false idea that all Christians are the same. The Christian faith comes in many different forms and varieties. Not everyone is a Roman Catholic or a member of the Southern Baptist religion.

You demand a religious test to weed out Christians. Sotomayor is a Marxist from a Catholic background. Clearly you Marxist object to evangelicals holding office.

Why do you think that she is a ""marxist"? What do you think that being a "marxist" means? Why do you think that "evangelicals" are somehow better? They don't act qualified to lead this nation. Are you a member of the southern baptist religion? Are you a jeffress, graham, focus on the family? Are you?

Answer the question, why don't you oppose Sotomeyer for her STATED non legal BIAS?

 

[Lysistrata]

we have a First Amendment.

We wouldn't if Hillary had been elected and installed another Kagan type Marxist.

We don't take our representatives to Government seriously about morals, once they enter public office, only politics and the law.

Your fellow Communists demand that a religious test be administered so that no Christian may serve on the court.

Such bullshit. There is no "religious test", just a search for assurances that a justice will not bring his or her religion into the court room and decisions that affect all Americans. Justice Sotomayor is a Christian, even graduating from Cardinal Spellman High School.

Please get off of this false idea that all Christians are the same. The Christian faith comes in many different forms and varieties. Not everyone is a Roman Catholic or a member of the Southern Baptist religion.

You demand a religious test to weed out Christians. Sotomayor is a Marxist from a Catholic background. Clearly you Marxist object to evangelicals holding office.

Why do you think that she is a ""marxist"? What do you think that being a "marxist" means? Why do you think that "evangelicals" are somehow better? They don't act qualified to lead this nation. Are you a member of the southern baptist religion? Are you a jeffress, graham, focus on the family? Are you?

Answer the question, why don't you oppose Sotomeyer for her STATED non legal BIAS?

Answer the question. yourself. Just who are you affiliated with? Sotomayor never flounced her religion around, scalia did.

 

[danielpalos]

Good idea.

Lets get the progressives on record as being religious bigots.

The question is whether a prospective justice is capable of leaving his or her religious views outside of the courtroom and making legal determinations in an impartial manner. This barrett has made no secret of her religious views and could be placed in a position in which she could inflict them on all Americans. I live near D.C., and I can tell you that scalia made religious speeches all over town and allowed his religion to govern his decision making. He did not make any attempt to even appear to be impartial.

The other day, I posted a link to the transcript of the oral argument in the Texas Whole Women's Health case. The justices who are known to be "conservative" did not ask even one question of the person arguing on behalf of the law in question that dealt with the substance of the law, even though major medical groups like the AMA and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology had already filed amicus briefs that totally rejected and undermined the "medical" claims being asserted by the state. This is an example of people appointed to the high court who cannot do their jobs.

It is not religious bigotry to ask whether a judicial nominee is capable of being impartial rather than being an activist for his or her religion.

Again I ask where is the record of her doing any such thing, she is a sitting Judge surely sine you claim it you can back it up with examples of her decisions from the bench?

Amy Coney Barrett & Roe v. Wade: Her Position on Abortion | Heavy.com

You know that this person is highly controversial. You are stoking the fires. Why is this person in contention rather than someone who has not stood out as an ideological activist?

Americans have a right to have our cases decided by an impartial judiciary.

BTW: exactly why was it that a group of justices did not question the Texas solicitor general defending the Texas law, particularly in view of all of the briefs submitted?

Should women be denied the vote as well?

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

 

[Lysistrata]

The question is whether a prospective justice is capable of leaving his or her religious views outside of the courtroom and making legal determinations in an impartial manner. This barrett has made no secret of her religious views and could be placed in a position in which she could inflict them on all Americans. I live near D.C., and I can tell you that scalia made religious speeches all over town and allowed his religion to govern his decision making. He did not make any attempt to even appear to be impartial.

The other day, I posted a link to the transcript of the oral argument in the Texas Whole Women's Health case. The justices who are known to be "conservative" did not ask even one question of the person arguing on behalf of the law in question that dealt with the substance of the law, even though major medical groups like the AMA and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology had already filed amicus briefs that totally rejected and undermined the "medical" claims being asserted by the state. This is an example of people appointed to the high court who cannot do their jobs.

It is not religious bigotry to ask whether a judicial nominee is capable of being impartial rather than being an activist for his or her religion.

Again I ask where is the record of her doing any such thing, she is a sitting Judge surely sine you claim it you can back it up with examples of her decisions from the bench?

Amy Coney Barrett & Roe v. Wade: Her Position on Abortion | Heavy.com

You know that this person is highly controversial. You are stoking the fires. Why is this person in contention rather than someone who has not stood out as an ideological activist?

Americans have a right to have our cases decided by an impartial judiciary.

BTW: exactly why was it that a group of justices did not question the Texas solicitor general defending the Texas law, particularly in view of all of the briefs submitted?

Should women be denied the vote as well?

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Again I ask where is the record of her doing any such thing, she is a sitting Judge surely sine you claim it you can back it up with examples of her decisions from the bench?

Amy Coney Barrett & Roe v. Wade: Her Position on Abortion | Heavy.com

You know that this person is highly controversial. You are stoking the fires. Why is this person in contention rather than someone who has not stood out as an ideological activist?

Americans have a right to have our cases decided by an impartial judiciary.

BTW: exactly why was it that a group of justices did not question the Texas solicitor general defending the Texas law, particularly in view of all of the briefs submitted?

Should women be denied the vote as well?

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

Any evidence Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't a political activist?

 

[Lysistrata]

Amy Coney Barrett & Roe v. Wade: Her Position on Abortion | Heavy.com

You know that this person is highly controversial. You are stoking the fires. Why is this person in contention rather than someone who has not stood out as an ideological activist?

Americans have a right to have our cases decided by an impartial judiciary.

BTW: exactly why was it that a group of justices did not question the Texas solicitor general defending the Texas law, particularly in view of all of the briefs submitted?

Should women be denied the vote as well?

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

Any evidence Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't a political activist?

Is she? In any event, this barrett is an active political/ideological activitist.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Should women be denied the vote as well?

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

Any evidence Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't a political activist?

Is she? In any event, this barrett is an active political/ideological activitist.

Que shock huh? Just as I thought, Zero.

Leftists cannot stop any nomination The Donald so chooses.


Thank Harry Reid, baby. I didn't think it was a good idea, but they pushed that and the ACA through, so there ya go.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

Any evidence Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't a political activist?

Is she? In any event, this barrett is an active political/ideological activitist.

Que shock huh? Just as I thought, Zero.

Leftists cannot stop any nomination The Donald so chooses.


Thank Harry Reid, baby. I didn't think it was a good idea, but they pushed that and the ACA through, so there ya go.

For some reason they think foot stomping will do it.

They're fugged beyond belief. Delicious

 

[bodecea]

Progressives Scramble To Block Potential Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Because She Is A Committed Christian - The American Dream
There is a lot of buzz that Amy Coney Barrett is going to be President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, and that is causing many progressives to totally freak out. The reason that they are freaking out doesn’t have anything to do with her credentials. In fact, as you will see below, Barrett is exceptionally qualified to be on the Supreme Court. She is sharp, intelligent and has a sterling reputation. But the left is already throwing a massive temper tantrum even though she isn’t the nominee yet for one very simple reason. Amy Coney Barrett is a committed Christian, and progressives are deathly afraid that her Christian values will influence her decisions on social issues.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Oh no we can't have a Christian in there I mean God forbid getting someone in there who would actualy judge fairly, or might have compassion unlike these loser fks who want to make everything and anything unethical , ethical because they think their power to control is above everyone else.

Let's get someone in there who isn't an ANTIFA fk.

There is no group of people the left won’t openly discriminate against it the effort to further their agenda, and amass power. Even their own so called constituency is expendable should it further “the cause”...

So-called christians aren't happy unless they can play the victim/martyr.

Says a homo who are notorious for whining about victim hood.

You stepped in your own pile...again.

It's amusing to watch the trumpanzee so-called christians double down on their hypocrisy. Must be part of their new 10 Commandments.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

We wouldn't if Hillary had been elected and installed another Kagan type Marxist.

Your fellow Communists demand that a religious test be administered so that no Christian may serve on the court.

Such bullshit. There is no "religious test", just a search for assurances that a justice will not bring his or her religion into the court room and decisions that affect all Americans. Justice Sotomayor is a Christian, even graduating from Cardinal Spellman High School.

Please get off of this false idea that all Christians are the same. The Christian faith comes in many different forms and varieties. Not everyone is a Roman Catholic or a member of the Southern Baptist religion.

You demand a religious test to weed out Christians. Sotomayor is a Marxist from a Catholic background. Clearly you Marxist object to evangelicals holding office.

Why do you think that she is a ""marxist"? What do you think that being a "marxist" means? Why do you think that "evangelicals" are somehow better? They don't act qualified to lead this nation. Are you a member of the southern baptist religion? Are you a jeffress, graham, focus on the family? Are you?

Answer the question, why don't you oppose Sotomeyer for her STATED non legal BIAS?

Answer the question. yourself. Just who are you affiliated with? Sotomayor never flounced her religion around, scalia did.

She flounced her desire to color her decisions by race.

 

[koshergrl]

What does your comment mean except to be misogynist? I was born a Catholic. It is truly a religion that devalues the female half of humanity and has rules enshrining penis-worship. It even bans anyone who does not have a penis from its leadership ranks. I remember having to pin a tissue to my head just to enter a church. I even ended up in St. Peter's with my Holy Mommy This woman apparently has been brainwashed in a joke of a religion.

Lousy female intuition, does that. We are all talk here. Where are your wonderful arguments? Damsels in distress really are worthless when there is no porn involved.

So you will reject all of the evidence that this woman is an ideological activist?

Figures. Personally, I can attest that I experienced what I wrote. All the shit, even down to the person who stopped me from entering St. Peter's until I arranged covering for my shoulders, and walking the catacombs. Where are your arguments that justify what I, personally, have experienced? I actually went through this shit, moron. Are you calling me a liar? Do you have any rational explanation as to what happened to myself as a teenager, in Rome with Holy Mommy?

Any evidence Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't a political activist?

Is she? In any event, this barrett is an active political/ideological activitist.

Que shock huh? Just as I thought, Zero.

Leftists cannot stop any nomination The Donald so chooses.


Thank Harry Reid, baby. I didn't think it was a good idea, but they pushed that and the ACA through, so there ya go.

Trump is brilliant at using their own stupidity against them.

 

[Silhouette]

A SCOTUS who values millenia old fairy tales over the Constitution is a terrible pick

You just want the Justices that value relatively new fairy tales, like the fallacy that "a man can become a woman". Stuff like that, right?

 

[Vastator]

They were going to have a fit, and try to trash anyone Trump nominated. They’d be calling Merrick Garland a pedophile if Trump had suggested him. They are a one issue party. The only slogan they stand for is “We hate Trump”.

 

[Silhouette]

A SCOTUS who values millenia old fairy tales over the Constitution is a terrible pick

Why is it that some people just don't get that we are a nation of secular laws....not a theocracy.

One of those secular laws, the 1st Amendment, is dedicated to the preservation of theocracy as sacred to the individual. So, there you go. It's time you "got it"...

A litmus test for Judge Amy Barrett would be "has she ever gone out and given an interview to the press just weeks before a Hearing saying how she was absolutely biased in favor of one side of litigants? Well that's what Justice Ginsburg did and I don't hear ANYTHING from the left about that being a job-killer. Yet just because Mrs. Barrett has private values, (like each and every single Justice does), suddenly "she's not qualified!".

Tell you what, maybe Trump will disqualify Amy Barrett if the left agrees to make Ginsburg step down as she should have three years ago.

 

[koshergrl]

A SCOTUS who values millenia old fairy tales over the Constitution is a terrible pick

Why is it that some people just don't get that we are a nation of secular laws....not a theocracy.

One of those secular laws, the 1st Amendment, is dedicated to the preservation of theocracy as sacred to the individual. So, there you go. It's time you "got it"...

You don't know what theocracy means, do you...

 

[Silhouette]

You don't know what theocracy means, do you...

Religion doesn't rule our nation, at least not recognized ones. It rules the individual of one in the 1st Amendment. The Church of LGBT is damn near doing it though.

 

[koshergrl]

You don't know what theocracy means, do you...

Religion doesn't rule our nation, at least not recognized ones. It rules the individual of one in the 1st Amendment. The Church of LGBT is damn near doing it though.

Ok well I don't understand what you are talking about, but I'll take your word for it.

Meanwhile, I had a post dumped because I correctly identified someone as promoting the same policies that the nazis used. Apparently we're not supposed to tell the truth here.

 

[Coyote]

Supreme Court candidates' views on abortion under scrutiny

She has spoken publicly about her conviction that life begins at conception, and in a 2003 law journal article, she argued that courts could be more flexible in overturning prior "errors" in precedent. She noted that courts have struggled over when to keep "an erroneous decision" on the books, citing as an example Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a major 1992 Supreme Court ruling that upheld Roe.

So which of her decisions were driven by her convictions over the Constitution? Be specific.

And since we already have justices wanting to use foreign law Instagram of our own, I'm not sure what your complaint really is.

What I am actually concerned about is a willingness to overturn established law.

 

[Vastator]

Supreme Court candidates' views on abortion under scrutiny

She has spoken publicly about her conviction that life begins at conception, and in a 2003 law journal article, she argued that courts could be more flexible in overturning prior "errors" in precedent. She noted that courts have struggled over when to keep "an erroneous decision" on the books, citing as an example Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a major 1992 Supreme Court ruling that upheld Roe.

So which of her decisions were driven by her convictions over the Constitution? Be specific.

And since we already have justices wanting to use foreign law Instagram of our own, I'm not sure what your complaint really is.

What I am actually concerned about is a willingness to overturn established law.

Like when they outlawed slavery?

 

[koshergrl]