It's called "satire", Gummo.
That is, if it even exists. I played the whole video when this thread started, I didn't hear it. Can anyone actually point it out with a time?
There are some thing I take at face value.
--- like the title of the OP? The one that dishonestly calls a
single person "pro-abortionist
s" (plural) even though he has no basis to know what that girl's position is or what the context was? You know, the one we're pretending was a valid premise?
Said it before, saying it again: the concepts of "Satan" and "pro-abortionist" have something in common: neither one exists. Some like to run threads on their own bizarre paranoid fantasies. Others like to join in without a critical eye -- at "face value".
I'll state this from a non-religious perspective:
Regardless of the existence of Satan, the theory and ideology of Satan is well established and understood by those of religious conviction and those without.
To quote part of Shakespeare's Rom & Jul:
'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.
Thus when one invokes Satan, you could replace Satan in the chant "Hail Satan" with any other word that describes REAL-WORLD practices that are unobjectionably evil. Such as:
"Murder."
"Rape."
"Robbery."
"Chaos"
"Deceit."
"Hail Murder" "Hail Rape" "Hail Robbery" "Hail Chaos" "Hail Deceit"
How would any of these be different than chanting "Hail Satan."
In fact, "Hail Satan" is an even more powerful chant because it embodies
ALL OF THE ABOVE CHANTS AND MUCH MUCH MORE, in a single word.
So even a non-religious person should understand the dire implications of chanting "Hail Satan" because whether or not they actually believe in Satan, they most certainly understand the real-world practices that are associated with Satan. There are many Atheists and others of non-religious background who READ THE BIBLE and still consider it a good teacher of morals, even if they don't believe most/any of it in the literal sense.
So be very careful when you say "Satan isn't real, so it doesn't matter."
Corporations aren't real either, they are LEGAL FICTIONs that exist on PAPER, and holy shit ARE THEY POWERFUL, and even the Atheist will admit that even Satan exists on PAPER.
----------------------------------------
I once had someone attempt to rebutt this argument by saying that "Corporations are composed of real-individuals, who belong to the Corporation as a whole."
So I replied:
"However, this organization to which they belong, titled the "Corporation" is a legal fiction, correct?"
"Yes," he said.
Then I inquired further,
"Do you not see how you have actually defeated your own argument, and, at the very least, strengthened mine?"
Him being a generally honest person (and an atheist), replied:
"Yes, ideas can exist as "Philosophical Fictions," was power is derived from real-individuals who "participate" in the established goal of that organization; therefore, Satanic theory exists as a philosophical fiction on paper, but there are many practitioners and participants of the ideology itself, thus granting power to the organization. It is very much akin to FIAT CURRENCY, the very name itself implies "belief," or "fiat" or "in
fidelity." The paper currency draws its power from the BELIEF of its value, which is its established purpose, to be a widget with innate value, irrespective of the market."
So be very aware of what you mean when you say "lulz s4t4n d03sn't exi$t n00b"
