Pretty big Gonads on this MTG thang

[g5000]

Not according to her voting record. IIRC, she was in the 40's or 50's. She may have talked like a conservative. But her voting record didn't reflect it.

Your recollection is incorrect. Cheney had an 80 percent lifetime rating from the Heritage Foundation.

Her Republican Conference Chair replacement, Elise Stefanik, has a lifetime rating of 56 percent.

 

[YoursTruly]

Your recollection is incorrect. Cheney had an 80 percent lifetime rating from the Heritage Foundation.

Her Republican Conference Chair replacement, Elise Stefanik, has a lifetime rating of 56 percent.

The Heritage grades congressmen different than the Conservative Reviews Liberty score. The Liberty Score is more constitutional & fiscally based. Where as the Heritage is more aligned with the broader view of the party and it's platform.
For example: The Heritage has Mike Johnson at 96%.
His Liberty score is at 74%.

Stefanik is at 58%

Considering how left the GOP leans now days, including their platform, the Heritage is way off base. At least for us fiscal conservatives.

 

[Billiejeens]

The Heritage grades congressmen different than the Conservative Reviews Liberty score. The Liberty Score is more constitutional & fiscally based. Where as the Heritage is more aligned with the broader view of the party and it's platform.
For example: The Heritage has Mike Johnson at 96%.
His Liberty score is at 74%.

Stefanik is at 58%

Considering how left the GOP leans now days, including their platform, the Heritage is way off base. At least for us fiscal conservatives.

You are fringe -

 

[g5000]

The Heritage grades congressmen different than the Conservative Reviews Liberty score. The Liberty Score is more constitutional & fiscally based. Where as the Heritage is more aligned with the broader view of the party and it's platform.
For example: The Heritage has Mike Johnson at 96%.
His Liberty score is at 74%.

Stefanik is at 58%

Considering how left the GOP leans now days, including their platform, the Heritage is way off base. At least for us fiscal conservatives.

.
I give all of Congress a big fat 0% for fiscal conservatism.

.

 

[leftwinger]

.
I give all of Congress a big fat 0% for fiscal conservatism.

.

SHUP on ridiculous un-elected Heratige or Lincoln BS or Cheney you dumb cart pulling OX.

 

[g5000]

SHUP on ridiculous un-elected Heratige or Lincoln BS or Cheney you dumb cart pulling OX.

Can you convert that to cogent English, please?

 

[YoursTruly]

.
I give all of Congress a big fat 0% for fiscal conservatism.

.

I'm at about 98%. Only a couple of actual FS left up there. Even MTG voted for the BBB. And IIRC, the two CR's as well.

 

[YoursTruly]

SHUP on ridiculous un-elected Heratige or Lincoln BS or Cheney you dumb cart pulling OX.

Was it you talking about not being divisive? Like within the last couple of days?

 

[skye]

So what? The Country needs him. The alternative was a complete criminal disaster or complete fiscal collapse. The elites stealing billions (USAID) to dig in their party forever. Corruption and fraud unimaginable going on in all departments.

At the end of 2019 ( under Trump 1.0) we were in a booming economic time like never seen before. I lived it in business. I know. Then they launched to stop it. Russian BS was not working.. Been chaos since.

I don't know if Trump policy can win this time? But the other chowderhead was instant death for the country.

If you can't see this you are not salvagable. Closet Stain with TDS.

^^^ That's absolutely right!

 

[YoursTruly]

^^^ That's absolutely right!

No it's not. Trump inherited an economic boom cycle. Just like he did this time.
He also came into office during an oil boom cycle.

But this time, he screwed up with his BS tariff wars and keeping the Biden Russian oil ban in place.
And is not spending more than Biden.

Y'all had 4 years to nominate an actual conservative. And the best y'all could come up with was another dem-lite.

I have to wonder why the GOP has to keep nominating RINO's. Then I remember y'all nominated Mitt Romney before Trump.
It's like a habit with you people.

 

[JoeB131]

Or -

You understand politics, and math and know who helps the cause(s) and who doesn't.

It isn't any harder than that really.

I understand politic and math just fine.

I just don't see the logic of running cover for Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile friends.

 

[skye]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 1185339

Notice this MAGA propaganda always sidesteps the name, "Epstein".

 

[YoursTruly]

View attachment 1185339

Trump has been on The View 18 times.

 

[YoursTruly]

I understand politic and math just fine.

I just don't see the logic of running cover for Jeffrey Epstein's pedophile friends.

They've had long enough to doctor anything in the files now. It'll end up being like the missing minute of Epsteins cell.

 

[drudge X]

Trump has always been too liberal. He was never a conservative then and not one today.

 

[JoeB131]

They've had long enough to doctor anything in the files now. It'll end up being like the missing minute of Epsteins cell.

I can't see it. Too many people who have no loyalty to Trump have seen the unredacted files, and redactions would be conspicious.

Just what's leaked so far - the Birthday letter, the email from Epstein saying Trump was spending time along with Guffrie (sp) - looks pretty bad on it's own.

The one thing they never learned from Watergate. It's not the crime that gets you into trouble; it's the cover-up.

 

[IM2]

Trump has the democrats going absolutely crazy.

They have no candidates, no policies, just "rage at Trump".

I love it, the mid-terms can;t come soon enough.

Wrong on every count. Stop watching Fox.

 

[IM2]

Trump is the one losing his mind. He knows things are going to come out. He participated in ******* children. He is the man who owned teenage beauty pageants and walked into locker rooms of young girls on purpose. The fact that so many have allowed this man to control them as he does is a sad reflection on the culture that supports him the most. MAGA is evidence of the immorality inherent in that culture. When Hillary called them deplorables, she should never have apologized after they began whining. When Biden called them garbage, he should have stood his ground and not retracted. You MAGATS are around 30 percent of the population. These losers insult 2/3rds of America, then whine when they get back what they dish out, and until recently, Democrats fell for the crocodile tears and catered to their feelings. Well, I think those days are pretty much done. So MAGATS don't start crying as you get back all of the crap you have spewed about Democrats since Newt Gingrich. The great one, the Most High, has told us, "What ye sows, ye shall also reap." It's reaping time for you right-wingers, and you ain't going to like your harvest

 

[YoursTruly]

I can't see it. Too many people who have no loyalty to Trump have seen the unredacted files, and redactions would be conspicious.

Just what's leaked so far - the Birthday letter, the email from Epstein saying Trump was spending time along with Guffrie (sp) - looks pretty bad on it's own.

The one thing they never learned from Watergate. It's not the crime that gets you into trouble; it's the cover-up.

Yeah but who's willing to risk calling out any fabrications, when Trump and his tribe will just claim they're lying. Seriously, if they don't have proof of the fabrications, Trump can bury them.