Here's what I'm taking from this latest dimocrat outrage.
Parties/candidates have platforms, so this voter has decided to approach elections with a platform too. Mine is very simple, just one plank. Any candidate who body slams or otherwise takes on a media puke or group of pukes gets my vote. Period.
Lot of people have that platform now. He raised a $100K immediately after the incident.
You guys know he's going to have to pay that reporter for assaulting him. So don't try to pretend what he did was right or justified. He may have still won the election but he's going to pay in court.
And it's probably going to be the taxpayers who pay.
He shouldn't have to pay him a dime. Maybe journalists should get insurance for when they hassle people and get in their space and get what is coming to them?
Again, I don't think you mean that. Because if this was your wife or grandmother and they got body slammed you would have a different opinion.
You can not physically assault someone because they are putting a microphone in your face or because you don't like their questions. If you think it is lawful then I don't know what to say because you just aren't being reasonable or intellectually honest.
What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish
self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.
So please at least tell me you know what this politician did was wrong. If not then I put you in the retard category.