President Trump: Making America Normal Again

However inevitable it was, this particular meme feels spot on to all who love America as it was intended to be:

1762366517095.webp
 
It’s abuse of office to threaten to withhold government funding if people don’t vote the way you want.

Don’t you agree?
It is not abuse of office to withhold funding when a vote, policy, mandate or whatever is detrimental to the unalienable rights of citizens and/or the rest of the country. Then it is perfectly justifiable not to hold the rest of the country hostage or force them to fund what should not be acceptable to anybody.
 
It is not abuse of office to withhold funding when a vote, policy, mandate or whatever is detrimental to the unalienable rights of citizens and/or the rest of the country. Then it is perfectly justifiable not to hold the rest of the country hostage or force them to fund what should not be acceptable to anybody.
Wow, that’s kind of extreme rhetoric.

What rights did Mamdami say he was going to take away exactly?
 
Wow, that’s kind of extreme rhetoric.

What rights did Mamdami say he was going to take away exactly?
Landlords right to make money set their own rent for one thing...the obligation to obey and Inforce federal law for another...the right for people to work and businesses to make a profit without being taxed out of over half of it
 
The NYT inflammatory, unethical, and most likely fabricated story about an Epstein email has triggered many new political threads by our DTS inflicted leftists--will be interesting to see how many of those multiple threads will still be there after a few hours.

The left's obsession with Epstein is either a) thoroughly dishonest deliberate propaganda using issued talking points or b) extremely unhealthy or c) based on a prurient desire to see salacious photos and videos of Epstein's victims which also is quite unhealthy.

Those engaged in the propaganda machine will most likely find it just as ineffective and make them look just as bad as their attempts to push other assigned talking points/dishonest propaganda--'collusion', 'Russia-Russia-Russia', 'insurrectionist', 'rapist', yadda yadda yadda, all dishonest, all unsupportable, all meanspirited and hateful.

But alas that, along with a culture of violence, has become the M.O. of the left. They have no sense of honesty, decency, ethics left.

I hope MAGAs will actively support keeping Congress in the hands of MAGA Republicans in the midterms and for the next several elections as well as putting MAGA Republicans in the White House until the left's culture of violence and unethical behavior can be broken.
 
What part of their statement referred to any actual right?
If you can't understand what Iroc wrote, I suspect there is still room in that remedial reading comprehension course I have recommended for so many on the left.
 
If you can't understand what Iroc wrote, I suspect there is still room in that remedial reading comprehension course I have recommended for so many on the left.
Why are you trying to talk through another poster?

I understood it fine, which is why I asked you the question that you’re incapable of answering.
 
Why are you trying to talk through another poster?

I understood it fine, which is why I asked you the question that you’re incapable of answering.
Because you ignored that other poster who said what needed to be said quite competently. I posted that I agreed with that poster. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
 
Because you ignored that other poster who said what needed to be said quite competently. I posted that I agreed with that poster. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
I often choose to ignore posters who have no capacity of rational discourse.

If you agree with the poster, then answer this. Where is there a stated right for businesses to not be taxed?
 
I often choose to ignore posters who have no capacity of rational discourse.

If you agree with the poster, then answer this. Where is there a stated right for businesses to not be taxed?
Of course anyone can be taxed. That is not what the poster was arguing though. But the way 'lefty rolls' I suppose you are not allowed to know what 'rational discourse' is.
 
Of course anyone can be taxed. That is not what the poster was arguing though. But the way 'lefty rolls' I suppose you are not allowed to know what 'rational discourse' is.
This is not a defensible statement.

the right for people to work and businesses to make a profit without being taxed out of over half of it

There is no such right.
 
This is not a defensible statement.



There is no such right.
You're a fool .....you don't work to give your money to people who don't or to people who are here illegally

The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to life by prohibiting the government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
 
You're a fool .....you don't work to give your money to people who don't or to people who are here illegally

The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to life by prohibiting the government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
Taxes do not violate any of those principles. You pay taxes according to the law.

Are you some kind of weird sovereign citizen type who thinks we don’t have to pay taxes?
 
Taxes do not violate any of those principles. You pay taxes according to the law.

Are you some kind of weird sovereign citizen type who thinks we don’t have to pay taxes?
The income tax was added in the 20th century nobody has a right to anybody else's money and immigrants are not supposed to get any benefits at all zero, nothing. When my great-grandparents came over here, my great grand father was killed in a boiler accident ...she raised five kids by herself , I'm sure she got some kind of help from the Jewish community but not from the government.....

Joe Biden gives tens of billions of dollars to illegal immigrants, even legal immigrants should not get any benefits from the government at all.... Church's religious institutions to can help them..the problem with liberals who don't contribute to charity like conservatives , who are way more charitable than your liberals friends ..you want to take people's money and give it to who you would think deserves it...not your money of course
 
15th post
Since the Democrats and radicals have been hollering Epstein as the assigned talking point for months now, the following is interesting. Admittedly, PJ Media may not be the most objective or unbiased source out there, but, assuming it's accurate, this is interesting:

". . .After Democrats released their three carefully selected emails out of context, Republicans responded by releasing all 20,000 documents. Democrats got angry about that move, which tells you everything you need to know about their supposed commitment to transparency.

The so-called bombshell unraveled as quickly as it appeared once people actually read the emails. They didn't implicate Trump at all. But Democrats got their headlines, and that was the point.

Related: Democrats Released Three Cherrypicked Epstein Emails, so the GOP Released 20,000

Burchett saw right through the political gamesmanship. Democrats had these files for four years. They sat on them. They did nothing. Then Trump won reelection, and suddenly Democrats discovered an urgent need for transparency. Burchett laid out the obvious conclusion: If there were anything damaging to Trump in those files, Democrats would have released it years ago . . ."

More interesting stuff here:
 
Since the Democrats and radicals have been hollering Epstein as the assigned talking point for months now, the following is interesting. Admittedly, PJ Media may not be the most objective or unbiased source out there, but, assuming it's accurate, this is interesting:

". . .After Democrats released their three carefully selected emails out of context, Republicans responded by releasing all 20,000 documents. Democrats got angry about that move, which tells you everything you need to know about their supposed commitment to transparency.

The so-called bombshell unraveled as quickly as it appeared once people actually read the emails. They didn't implicate Trump at all. But Democrats got their headlines, and that was the point.

Related: Democrats Released Three Cherrypicked Epstein Emails, so the GOP Released 20,000

Burchett saw right through the political gamesmanship. Democrats had these files for four years. They sat on them. They did nothing. Then Trump won reelection, and suddenly Democrats discovered an urgent need for transparency. Burchett laid out the obvious conclusion: If there were anything damaging to Trump in those files, Democrats would have released it years ago . . ."

More interesting stuff here:
I forget. Is it normal for a president to have been close personal friends with the country’s most notorious pediphile?

If this were a normal country, that would have ended his career in politics.
 
I forget. Is it normal for a president to have been close personal friends with the country’s most notorious pediphile?

If this were a normal country, that would have ended his career in politics.
Nope. And so far as I know the only ones who have appeared to be close personal friends with the country's most notorious pedophile have all been Democrats.

It also is not normal to be so TDS afflicted that you would post something that clueless and ignorant. Maybe you should get help for that?

Meanwhile President Trump and his team are fighting against the corrupt and dishonest and malicious and mean spirited by putting the truth out there again and again and again and again. And they are what a normal America should be. Not those who maliciously spread dishonest propaganda via the current assigned talking point.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom