President Trump Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate 2020 Election Fraud

[StatesRightsForever]

Like millions of americans, i saw the election stolen. Trump had huge leads of 10% or so with 70% of the vote counted in battleground states like michigan and then in the dead of night it all vanished.

june 20 2025 The world’s most powerful man is now calling for accountability for the election that many believe was stolen from him.

President Trump posted on Truth Social a short time ago that he wants a special prosecutor to investigate fraud in the 2020 Presidential election, which was allegedly ‘won’ by Joe Biden.

“Zero Border crossings for the month for TRUMP, verses 60,000 for Sleepy, Crooked Joe Biden, a man who lost the 2020 Presidential Election by a “LANDSLIDE!,” Trump wrote. “Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD! The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING.”


“A Special Prosecutor must be appointed,” he added. “This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin! What this Crooked man, and his CORRUPT CRONIES, have done to our Country in 4 years, is grossly indescribable!”

BREAKING: President Trump Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate 2020 Election Fraud | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

The world’s most powerful man is now calling for accountability for the election that many believe was stolen from him.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[leftwinger]

Don't know where to put this. Showing Police equally will stop all resistors runners fighters etc. Maybe occured on Juneteenth? Not african for sure. Could be caucasion or mexican?

when they find those who rigged 2020 and lied for 5 years.....give them this sort of business.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

No question it was stolen. The dem gov in PA sent out millions of no-excuse absentee ballots even though the state constitution bans them!

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans rewriting history

 

[BlindBoo]

Good thing we have laws and rules against tyrannical wannabe dictators like Herr Trumpybear, that will force any prosecutor he gets appointed, to present actual evidence, not hearsay, into the court proceedings. We know that will never happen. It will be a lot of enflamed talking points for the FAUX NOT NEWS consumers.

Here's the real criminal that should have had his day in court over the 2020 election scam he tried to pull off.

https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/report-of-special-counsel-smith-volume-1-january-2025.pdf

 

[rightwinger]

Trump is appointing the My Pillow Guy to head the investigation

 

[justoffal]

Don't know where to put this. Showing Police equally will stop all resistors runners fighters etc. Maybe occured on Juneteenth? Not african for sure. Could be caucasion or mexican?

when they find those who rigged 2020 and lied for 5 years.....give them this sort of business.

That's awesome

 

[Lesh]

Like millions of americans, i saw the election stolen. Trump had huge leads of 10% or so with 70% of the vote counted in battleground states like michigan and then in the dead of night it all vanished.

BREAKING: President Trump Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate 2020 Election Fraud | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

The world’s most powerful man is now calling for accountability for the election that many believe was stolen from him.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Big Lie Lives

Ya know what they’ll find?

REPUBLICAN election fraud

 

[OldFlame]

About damn time.

 

[Donald H]

Trump is appointing the My Pillow Guy to head the investigation

There's virtually no possibility that this investigation won't produce enough evidence to allow Trump to proceed to political arrests.

Resistance is futile.

Your only remedy your Constitution has to offer is impeachment. LOL

 

[DonGlock26]

Let’s see what a federal grand jury finds out.

 

[Lesh]

Let’s see what a federal grand jury finds out.

This has been all through the courts

 

[SeaMajor7]

This has been all through the courts

Nope, they all cried NO STANDING.

 

[BlindBoo]

Nope, they all cried NO STANDING.

Shirley you know Faux Not News lies, right?

Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

• Trump v. Biden (Wis. Dec. 14, 2020) – In a 4-3 decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of Trump’s four claims under the doctrine of laches. However, it decided on the merits Trump’s claim that voters wrongfully declared themselves indefinitely confined. Ultimately, the court ruled against Trump on this claim because Trump challenged the status of all voters who claimed an indefinitely confined status, rather than individual voters. Trump petitioned to the U.S. Supreme Court for writ of certiorari on Dec. 29, 2020 with a motion for expedited consideration, but the court denied his motion to expedite on January 11.
• Trump v. Wis. Elecs. Comm’n (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020) – The district court dismissed Trump’s claim that Wisconsin officials violated his rights under the Electors Clause because said officials allegedly issued guidance on state election statutes that deviated significantly from the requirements of Wisconsin’s election statutes. First, the court found that interpretations of election administration rules do not fall under the meaning of “Manner” in the Electors Clause. Moreover, even if “Manner” were read so broadly, the defendants had acted consistently with, and as expressly authorized by, the Wisconsin Legislature; their issued guidance did not significantly or materially depart from legislative direction. Thus, there was no violation of the Electors Clause. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion on Dec. 24, 2020. Trump filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 30, 2020 along with a motion for expedited consideration, and the court denied Trump’s motion to expedite on January 11.
• King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2020) – While the district court stated that the claims of plaintiffs—Republican presidential electors—could be dismissed for lack of standing, the district court nonetheless analyzed the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. First, the district court was unpersuaded by the plaintiffs’ claim that defendants violated the Elections and Electors Clauses by allegedly violating the Michigan Election Code because it found that deviations from state election law are not the same as modifications of state election law. Second, the district court found the plaintiffs’ Equal Protection claim to be too speculative, finding no evidence that physical ballots were altered. The plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 11, 2020, and subsequently filed a motion for expedited consideration on Dec. 18, 2020. However, the court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.
• .........

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...

campaignlegal.org

 

[Donald H]

This has been all through the courts

You know that Trump's investigation will succeed don't you.

The huge majority of Americans laugh at the courts.

And already many judges who aren't sympathetic to the regime's cause have been arrested.

 

[Clipper]

Like millions of americans, i saw the election stolen. Trump had huge leads of 10% or so with 70% of the vote counted in battleground states like michigan and then in the dead of night it all vanished.

BREAKING: President Trump Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate 2020 Election Fraud | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

The world’s most powerful man is now calling for accountability for the election that many believe was stolen from him.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Remember how Trump conned his idiot supporters in that "stop the steal" scam he ran past them sfter the 2020 electiom & collected over $200 million of which he never accounted for a dime of what he did with it? Didn't Trump claim he was going to investigate the so called "stolen election" with those funds? Well? How'd that work out?

The Feds should have charged your boy with wire fraud for the biggest conjob in history that you MAGA idiots fell for.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Shirley you know Faux Not News lies, right?

Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

• Trump v. Biden (Wis. Dec. 14, 2020) – In a 4-3 decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of Trump’s four claims under the doctrine of laches. However, it decided on the merits Trump’s claim that voters wrongfully declared themselves indefinitely confined. Ultimately, the court ruled against Trump on this claim because Trump challenged the status of all voters who claimed an indefinitely confined status, rather than individual voters. Trump petitioned to the U.S. Supreme Court for writ of certiorari on Dec. 29, 2020 with a motion for expedited consideration, but the court denied his motion to expedite on January 11.
• Trump v. Wis. Elecs. Comm’n (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020) – The district court dismissed Trump’s claim that Wisconsin officials violated his rights under the Electors Clause because said officials allegedly issued guidance on state election statutes that deviated significantly from the requirements of Wisconsin’s election statutes. First, the court found that interpretations of election administration rules do not fall under the meaning of “Manner” in the Electors Clause. Moreover, even if “Manner” were read so broadly, the defendants had acted consistently with, and as expressly authorized by, the Wisconsin Legislature; their issued guidance did not significantly or materially depart from legislative direction. Thus, there was no violation of the Electors Clause. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion on Dec. 24, 2020. Trump filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 30, 2020 along with a motion for expedited consideration, and the court denied Trump’s motion to expedite on January 11.
• King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2020) – While the district court stated that the claims of plaintiffs—Republican presidential electors—could be dismissed for lack of standing, the district court nonetheless analyzed the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. First, the district court was unpersuaded by the plaintiffs’ claim that defendants violated the Elections and Electors Clauses by allegedly violating the Michigan Election Code because it found that deviations from state election law are not the same as modifications of state election law. Second, the district court found the plaintiffs’ Equal Protection claim to be too speculative, finding no evidence that physical ballots were altered. The plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 11, 2020, and subsequently filed a motion for expedited consideration on Dec. 18, 2020. However, the court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.
• .........

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...

campaignlegal.org

You FEEL that's all there was?
Where you been, boo? Haven't seen your blind ass around here since Trump's REELECTION.
Finally done licking your wounds?

 

[rightwinger]

There's virtually no possibility that this investigation won't produce enough evidence to allow Trump to proceed to political arrests.

Resistance is futile.

Your only remedy your Constitution has to offer is impeachment. LOL

Agree

Trump will get the results he demands

 

[Donald H]

Agree

Trump will get the results he demands

Now that you understand the situation, you can be more effective as the voice of the opposition.

First, don't get involved in debates you can't win.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Good thing we have laws and rules against tyrannical wannabe dictators like Herr Trumpybear, that will force any prosecutor he gets appointed, to present actual evidence, not hearsay, into the court proceedings. We know that will never happen. It will be a lot of enflamed talking points for the FAUX NOT NEWS consumers.

Here's the real criminal that should have had his day in court over the 2020 election scam he tried to pull off.

https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/report-of-special-counsel-smith-volume-1-january-2025.pdf

It would be funny if the independent prosecutor turned around and refiled the Smith charges against him.