President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[elvis]

you thought wrong.

no surprise there. traitor.

Not another mindless obamabot.

by the way....I'm not a republican

are you suggesting that the rules of the nobel prize committee preclue them from looking at any accomplishments of any nominees AFTER I Feb?

If so...please provide a link that supports that suggestion or...alternatively, stfu.

and tell us what he has accomplished SINCE then besides doubling Bush's debt.

 

[dilloduck]

you wouild rather denigrate our president along with the taliban for recieving a presitigious award than be proud of him for what such an award means for our nation.

traitor.

you are a ******* moron
you dont see that my comments have been that it was wrong of the nobel commitee and not the fault of Obama then you are a bigger ******* idiot than you are showing here

again, **** off

again... why owuld any patriotic american spend a moment's time agreeing with the taliban and arguing with the nobel prize committee's decision to give their president the nobel peace prize?

because they are either a partisan hack or a flat out traitor...or both.

I'm betting on both

AHEM---let me try to explain this again for the slower people among us.
Patriotic Americans and the Taliban have ENTIRELY differerent reason for scoffing at the Peace Prize committee.
stop being intentionally stupid

 

[Zoom-boing]

I wonder if he tithes. how much money would Reverand Wright's church get?

Can't tithe if you don't belong to a church; he doesn't. He and the wife haven't 'found' one yet.

I bet they still tithe to Rev Wright's church.

Perhaps on the 'down low', eh?

 

[DiveCon]

you thought wrong.

no surprise there. traitor.

Not another mindless obamabot.

by the way....I'm not a republican

are you suggesting that the rules of the nobel prize committee preclue them from looking at any accomplishments of any nominees AFTER I Feb?

If so...please provide a link that supports that suggestion or...alternatively, stfu.

actually, since you have made the claim that they can, wopuldnt that put the onus on YOU to provide the proof they can?

 

[Immanuel]

you wouild rather denigrate our president along with the taliban for recieving a presitigious award than be proud of him for what such an award means for our nation.

traitor.

Please help me with this Maineman, what exactly had he done when he was nominated?

I'm sorry, but I feel that this award is at least a year too early. I'm not saying that either next year or the year after he would not have deserved the recognition, but I truly believe that you are nominated for awards such as this for things that you have done, not things that you say you will do.

I believe that this award, not only cheapens the award itself but anything the President may do in the future regarding world peace.

Immie

yeah, how can obama be a champion of world peace when he is leading two wars?

I have been told you are a conservative and have seen little to dispute that. Would you consider that President Bush was attempting to bring peace to Iraq by building up that nation or do you simply think he was a warmonger?

How about Afghanistan? Was his goal there to bring about peace through strength or was it to kill innocent men, women and children?

If you would consider President Bush's efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as having the ultimate goal peace in the middle east, how can you fault President Obama for using the same methods?

Immie

 

[Si modo]

you wouild rather denigrate our president along with the taliban for recieving a presitigious award than be proud of him for what such an award means for our nation.

traitor.

you are a ******* moron
you dont see that my comments have been that it was wrong of the nobel commitee and not the fault of Obama then you are a bigger ******* idiot than you are showing here

again, **** off

again... why owuld any patriotic american spend a moment's time agreeing with the taliban and arguing with the nobel prize committee's decision to give their president the nobel peace prize?

because they are either a partisan hack or a flat out traitor...or both.

I'm betting on both

*facepalm*

And if the Taliban said 2+2=4?

 

[Zoom-boing]

are you suggesting that the rules of the nobel prize committee preclue them from looking at any accomplishments of any nominees AFTER I Feb?

If so...please provide a link that supports that suggestion or...alternatively, stfu.

What were the reasons for him being nominated 10 days after taking office?

 

[rubberhead]

you are a ******* moron
you dont see that my comments have been that it was wrong of the nobel commitee and not the fault of Obama then you are a bigger ******* idiot than you are showing here

again, **** off

again... why owuld any patriotic american spend a moment's time agreeing with the taliban and arguing with the nobel prize committee's decision to give their president the nobel peace prize?

because they are either a partisan hack or a flat out traitor...or both.

I'm betting on both

because the Taliban was correct when they said he didn't deserve it. So wipe obama's semen off your face, ok, shitstain.

That's going to be a sticking point in Obama's unconditional negotiations with the Taliban. Oh wait, he'll probably just be a ***** and concede that they're right because he agreed with them at the press briefing that he held the morning he received the award. Some people just aren't paying attention.

 

[Si modo]

you thought wrong.

no surprise there. traitor.

Not another mindless obamabot.

by the way....I'm not a republican

are you suggesting that the rules of the nobel prize committee preclue them from looking at any accomplishments of any nominees AFTER I Feb?

If so...please provide a link that supports that suggestion or...alternatively, stfu.

Good God!

Deadline for nominations is February 1st.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Not another mindless obamabot.

by the way....I'm not a republican

are you suggesting that the rules of the nobel prize committee preclue them from looking at any accomplishments of any nominees AFTER I Feb?

If so...please provide a link that supports that suggestion or...alternatively, stfu.

and tell us what he has accomplished SINCE then besides doubling Bush's debt.

There must be plenty , He has written 2 auto biographies .

 

[Modbert]

There must be plenty , He has written 2 auto biographies .

Can't fault a man for trying to make an extra cash through legal means. Only reason there was an second autobiography is because the first sold well.

 

[elvis]

Please help me with this Maineman, what exactly had he done when he was nominated?

I'm sorry, but I feel that this award is at least a year too early. I'm not saying that either next year or the year after he would not have deserved the recognition, but I truly believe that you are nominated for awards such as this for things that you have done, not things that you say you will do.

I believe that this award, not only cheapens the award itself but anything the President may do in the future regarding world peace.

Immie

yeah, how can obama be a champion of world peace when he is leading two wars?

I have been told you are a conservative and have seen little to dispute that. Would you consider that President Bush was attempting to bring peace to Iraq by building up that nation or do you simply think he was a warmonger?

How about Afghanistan? Was his goal there to bring about peace through strength or was it to kill innocent men, women and children?

If you would consider President Bush's efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as having the ultimate goal peace in the middle east, how can you fault President Obama for using the same methods?

Immie

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, how can obama be a champion of world peace when he is leading two wars?

I have been told you are a conservative and have seen little to dispute that. Would you consider that President Bush was attempting to bring peace to Iraq by building up that nation or do you simply think he was a warmonger?

How about Afghanistan? Was his goal there to bring about peace through strength or was it to kill innocent men, women and children?

If you would consider President Bush's efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as having the ultimate goal peace in the middle east, how can you fault President Obama for using the same methods?

Immie

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

not for what he did in Iraq, but his AIDS relief to Africa would have qualified

 

[RadiomanATL]

yeah, how can obama be a champion of world peace when he is leading two wars?

I have been told you are a conservative and have seen little to dispute that. Would you consider that President Bush was attempting to bring peace to Iraq by building up that nation or do you simply think he was a warmonger?

How about Afghanistan? Was his goal there to bring about peace through strength or was it to kill innocent men, women and children?

If you would consider President Bush's efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as having the ultimate goal peace in the middle east, how can you fault President Obama for using the same methods?

Immie

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

Yeah, but ultimately democracy really equals peace. Historically, democratic countries do not wage war upon each other.

Would I have given Bush a NPP? Hell no. His little Iraq adventure has done more to destabilize the region than Saddam ever could have hoped to....

Shit, just realized that I wouldn't talk anymore about Bush + Iraq. Nevermind.

But no, Bush didn't deserve it either. At any point in his life IMO. Clinton probably deserved it more. For both his accomplishments (and attempted accomplishments) while in office and his humanitarian efforts since.

 

[elvis]

I have been told you are a conservative and have seen little to dispute that. Would you consider that President Bush was attempting to bring peace to Iraq by building up that nation or do you simply think he was a warmonger?

How about Afghanistan? Was his goal there to bring about peace through strength or was it to kill innocent men, women and children?

If you would consider President Bush's efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan as having the ultimate goal peace in the middle east, how can you fault President Obama for using the same methods?

Immie

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

not for what he did in Iraq, but his AIDS relief to Africa would have qualified

actually you are right. He did more for AIDS relief than any other president.

 

[Modbert]

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

"The spirit of democracy cannot be imposed from without. It has to come from within," - Mohandas K. Gandhi.

 

[elvis]

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

"The spirit of democracy cannot be imposed from without. It has to come from within," - Mohandas K. Gandhi.

how did it work in West Germany? Wasn't it force on them?

 

[Modbert]

not for what he did in Iraq, but his AIDS relief to Africa would have qualified

It would of had qualified. However, considering his body of actions, he would of been disqualified.

 

[GWV5903]

Yeah ok. I think the way women are being treated there is a function of their culture, not whether Hussein is in power.

Which is exactly my point and what I've been saying here on this board for over a year now.

Good point, when you are trying to manage the cultural change that is thousands of years old, you need to take it one step at a time, your not going to solve this by skipping GO, as they say......

The battle isn't in the desert wasteland battlegrounds. It's in the classroom. It's in teaching the males of Afghanistan that equality for women is the right thing to do.

So how is it we gained our independence? Do you believe we did it in the classroom, and I am not trying to be sarcastic, the classroom can be a great arena for teaching, but let me assure you, we didn't gain our independence in the classroom.....

However, we can't do that since their culture would not allow them such a thing.

So the Muslims who live in America, do you believe all of their wives and daughters live under this rule of culture you claim can't be changed?????

As long as their culture is the way it is, women in Afghanistan will never be liberated and always be second class citizens.

Then you stay behind and keep to yourself.....let the real believers in freedom continue the fight.........

 

[RadiomanATL]

Bush's ultimate goal was not peace in the middle east. it was democracy in the middle east. i wouldn't have given Bush a peace prize either.

"The spirit of democracy cannot be imposed from without. It has to come from within," - Mohandas K. Gandhi.

how did it work in West Germany? Wasn't it force on them?

Eh, the seeds of democracy had been in place before Hitler. The Nazi's were just a detour.