Preliminary Accounting…Not Profits....Losses
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #23
The First Amendment of the Constitution gives us freedom of religion, including Sharia Law. You must have been sick and stayed home from homskool that day.
Clearly you have never studied either Sharia nor the Constitution, or you would have saved yourself the embarrassment of appearing as stupid as you do.
Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,121
- 190
- Banned
- #25
So there's no real freedom of religion really. I was just pointing that out. Did you get it? No? Maybe now you do.The First Amendment of the Constitution gives us freedom of religion, including Sharia Law. You must have been sick and stayed home from homskool that day.
Clearly you have never studied either Sharia nor the Constitution, or you would have saved yourself the embarrassment of appearing as stupid as you do.
- Thread starter
- #27
Opposing religious liberty has always been central to certain political philosophies.
12. In more recent origination than the French Revolution, both Leftist’s groups, Nazis and Communists, assaults on humanity, claim descent from one source, exposing the government school lie, that either one is Right wing: Nazis and Communists are peas from the same pod.
A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebbels’s....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.
"Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
"Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
The translation of the name of the Nazis, of course, includes ‘Socialist," the view of today's Democrat Party, as well.
Both Nazis and Communists are Leftwing. As is today’s version, the Democrat Party.
If you voted Biden, these are the groups you supported.
12. In more recent origination than the French Revolution, both Leftist’s groups, Nazis and Communists, assaults on humanity, claim descent from one source, exposing the government school lie, that either one is Right wing: Nazis and Communists are peas from the same pod.
A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebbels’s....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.
"Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
"Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.
The translation of the name of the Nazis, of course, includes ‘Socialist," the view of today's Democrat Party, as well.
Both Nazis and Communists are Leftwing. As is today’s version, the Democrat Party.
If you voted Biden, these are the groups you supported.
More facts not in evidence. America just took a major turn FROM authoritarian and ideological rule. We are not Bolshevik Russia and are not on our way to becoming such.
Partly true at best. The Pilgrims fled religious persecution but then persecuted any who opposed their interpretation of the Bible. It was this religious intolerance that led to the founding of Rhode Island and made the Bill of Rights necessary.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #31
13. “Why do repressive governments fear religious freedom?
Because it challenges the authority of the state more than any other freedom. People who adhere to a religion believe that there’s something higher than the state, and no repressive government can tolerate such a belief.
One of the first things the communists did in Russia after the Russian Revolution in 1917 was to close nearly every church and take control of all religious life in the Soviet Union—Christian, Jewish, and Muslim. To this day, all religious life in China is strictly controlled by the Chinese communist government. They were right.
There is no example in history of a regime suppressing religious freedom and not suppressing other freedoms.”
14. "....the Soviet regime looked for ways to force the churches to accept the existence of the new order and to acknowledge their political subordination to it. In 1922....the churches were ordered to hand over all of their sacred treasures, including the chalices and vestments used for the holy sacrament.
The state then seized the objects by force in the course of the expropriation over 8,000 clergy were killed and there were more than 1,400 violent clashes.....
The regime staged fifty-five trials of recalcitrant clergy.....executed a number of prominent churchmen... "
"The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia," by Richard Overy, p. 272-273
15. The current Democrat attitude toward religion and religious freedom can be traced to the 32nd President, and his affection of Stalin, and Soviet Communism.
To trick the American public into support for the Russian tyrant....Roosevelt swore to the American public the exact opposite: he declared that Stalin fought for the same ideals! FDR was lying!
September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137
Because it challenges the authority of the state more than any other freedom. People who adhere to a religion believe that there’s something higher than the state, and no repressive government can tolerate such a belief.
One of the first things the communists did in Russia after the Russian Revolution in 1917 was to close nearly every church and take control of all religious life in the Soviet Union—Christian, Jewish, and Muslim. To this day, all religious life in China is strictly controlled by the Chinese communist government. They were right.
There is no example in history of a regime suppressing religious freedom and not suppressing other freedoms.”
14. "....the Soviet regime looked for ways to force the churches to accept the existence of the new order and to acknowledge their political subordination to it. In 1922....the churches were ordered to hand over all of their sacred treasures, including the chalices and vestments used for the holy sacrament.
The state then seized the objects by force in the course of the expropriation over 8,000 clergy were killed and there were more than 1,400 violent clashes.....
The regime staged fifty-five trials of recalcitrant clergy.....executed a number of prominent churchmen... "
"The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia," by Richard Overy, p. 272-273
15. The current Democrat attitude toward religion and religious freedom can be traced to the 32nd President, and his affection of Stalin, and Soviet Communism.
To trick the American public into support for the Russian tyrant....Roosevelt swore to the American public the exact opposite: he declared that Stalin fought for the same ideals! FDR was lying!
September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137
- Thread starter
- #32
16. Democrats aim to suppress religion….but that is just the beginning of their assault on liberty. Just one example of what the Nazis do when they take over:
“Democratic Member Seeks To Disbar Two Dozen Lawyers Challenging Election Results
…the campaign of harassment and threats against Republican lawyers to get them to drop election challenges. New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell expanded that campaign this week with a malicious and frivolous demand for New York and other states to disbar roughly two dozen lawyers for representing Trump, the Republican party, or the Trump campaign in the litigation. …it is a familiar campaign that is unfolding without objections from most [Democrat] media figures, lawyers, or law professors…. Trying to strip people of their counsel, of course, is the real attack on our democracy — …” Democratic Member Seeks To Disbar Two Dozen Lawyers Challenging Election Results
17. One senses a peek into the future….
In his novel, "The Unlikely Spy," Daniel Silva writes of a brilliant law student, one predicted to, one day to sit on the Reichsgerict, Germany's Supreme Court, who decries.....
"Hitler changed all of that. Hitler believed in the rule of men, not the rule of law. Within months of taking power he turned Germany's entire judicial system upside down.
Führergewalt. - Führer power- became the absolute law of the land, and Hitler's every maniacal whim was immediately translated into codes and regulations.
Vogel remembered some of the ridiculous maxims coined by the architects of Hitler's legal overhaul of Germany: 'Law is what is useful to the German people! Law must be interpreted through healthy folk emotions!
When the normal judiciary stood in their way the Nazis established their own courts- Volksgerichtshof, the People's Courts.
...in October 1933, when 10,000 lawyers stood on the steps of the Reichsgericht in Leipzig, arms raised in the Nazi salute, and swore 'to follow the course of the Führer to the end of our days.'"
I don’t expect that the facts of this thread will alter the election, or even the political outlook of Democrat voters….merely that said voters take ownership of the damage they’ve done to this once great nation. You can never use the excuse that you didn’t know.
“Democratic Member Seeks To Disbar Two Dozen Lawyers Challenging Election Results
…the campaign of harassment and threats against Republican lawyers to get them to drop election challenges. New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell expanded that campaign this week with a malicious and frivolous demand for New York and other states to disbar roughly two dozen lawyers for representing Trump, the Republican party, or the Trump campaign in the litigation. …it is a familiar campaign that is unfolding without objections from most [Democrat] media figures, lawyers, or law professors…. Trying to strip people of their counsel, of course, is the real attack on our democracy — …” Democratic Member Seeks To Disbar Two Dozen Lawyers Challenging Election Results
17. One senses a peek into the future….
In his novel, "The Unlikely Spy," Daniel Silva writes of a brilliant law student, one predicted to, one day to sit on the Reichsgerict, Germany's Supreme Court, who decries.....
"Hitler changed all of that. Hitler believed in the rule of men, not the rule of law. Within months of taking power he turned Germany's entire judicial system upside down.
Führergewalt. - Führer power- became the absolute law of the land, and Hitler's every maniacal whim was immediately translated into codes and regulations.
Vogel remembered some of the ridiculous maxims coined by the architects of Hitler's legal overhaul of Germany: 'Law is what is useful to the German people! Law must be interpreted through healthy folk emotions!
When the normal judiciary stood in their way the Nazis established their own courts- Volksgerichtshof, the People's Courts.
...in October 1933, when 10,000 lawyers stood on the steps of the Reichsgericht in Leipzig, arms raised in the Nazi salute, and swore 'to follow the course of the Führer to the end of our days.'"
I don’t expect that the facts of this thread will alter the election, or even the political outlook of Democrat voters….merely that said voters take ownership of the damage they’ve done to this once great nation. You can never use the excuse that you didn’t know.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Mamdani Condemns New Yorkers For Making Muslims Throw Bombs At Them
- Started by Eman623
- Replies: 0
-
Whistleblower claims ex-DOGE member says he took Social Security data to new job- Started by Zincwarrior
- Replies: 1
-
