Pravda Responds...In A Way


Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
Reaction score
Brooklyn, NY
1. How do you suppose the state media deals with evidence that sinks their candidate?

Evidence: “the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.” Google

“The most insidious power of the media is the power to ignore.”
Chris Plante

2. When the sort of hard evidence, the laptop, suddenly became known, there was the risible thread about the story “unraveling,” …..but quite the opposite happened: more and more of the emails and photos and messages rang true.

Then it was claimed to be some Russian disinformation plot….but the DNI squashed that attempt.

And then the media, even the media that taxpayers support, NPR went to work for their candidate: “We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions,” Samuel reasoned. “And quite frankly, that’s where we ended up, this was . . . a politically driven event and we decided to treat it that way.”

3. But when the Biden business partner gave a press conference, validating everything in the laptop, and the proof that Joe Biden signed up to be a Ukraine, Russia, China “asset” for bucks and equity in fake companies, the next turn was this from the Washington Post turns out a nasty little piece about how no one should pay any attention:

“We’ve reached the Tony Bobulinski stage of the campaign

… Mr. Bobulinski enters. A former business partner of Hunter Biden’s, he apparently became frustrated at learning that the former vice president’s son had made a business deal in China without him. He’s since decided to help Giuliani and Senate Republicans dig through as much of Hunter Biden’s business history as possible. His presence at the debate, it appears, is either meant to rattle Joe Biden for unclear reasons — or simply to inject more energy into Trump’s base, many of whom have been tracking the expanding intricacies of the Hunter Biden plotline with great enthusiasm.”

4. One would hope that there are enough citizens with integrity to see that there is far more actual proof here than in the three years of the Mueller Fiasco, and there the media couldn’t wait to produce tons of ‘investigations.’

5. There is not as single Democrat apologist who doesn’t know that every element of the story is true, and who doesn’t hope that enough have early voted to make the revelations moot.

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List