Poweful photos of people living in poverty....

[Redfish]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

 

[rightwinger]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs



.

 

[Mr Natural]

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Waddya mean? They created plenty of jobs.



In China.

 

[Redfish]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

 

[Redfish]

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Waddya mean? They created plenty of jobs.



In China.

why did American jobs go to China and Mexico? any idea?

 

[Mr Natural]

why did American jobs go to China and Mexico? any idea?

Yeah, because American workers make too much, right?

 

[rightwinger]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't...they decided they liked the lower salaries

 

[Mr Natural]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't

And why would they?

They can pay a Chinese worker two bucks an hour for the same job that an American worker would get $25 an hour for.

And then blame the difference on taxes and regulations.

And, of course, the rightwing dupes eat that shit up.

 

[Slyhunter]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't

And why would they?

They can pay a Chinese worker two bucks an hour for the same job that an American worker would get $25 an hour for.

And then blame the difference on taxes and regulations.

And, of course, the rightwing dupes eat that shit up.

$25 an hour is too much dial it back to something reasonable. Second trump will enact tariffs against those who dont pay decent salaries. I said decent not outrageouse

 

[JimBowie1958]

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't

And why would they?

They can pay a Chinese worker two bucks an hour for the same job that an American worker would get $25 an hour for.

And then blame the difference on taxes and regulations.

And, of course, the rightwing dupes eat that shit up.

$25 an hour is too much dial it back to something reasonable. Second trump will enact tariffs against those who dont pay decent salaries. I said decent not outrageouse

The minimum wage in 1970 in todays dollars adjusted for taxes and inflation would be $20/hour.

No, American workers making $25 an hour are not over paid.

That is the cost of hiring free people to work for you instead of wage slaves in India or indentured servants from China.

 

[Slyhunter]

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't

And why would they?

They can pay a Chinese worker two bucks an hour for the same job that an American worker would get $25 an hour for.

And then blame the difference on taxes and regulations.

And, of course, the rightwing dupes eat that shit up.

$25 an hour is too much dial it back to something reasonable. Second trump will enact tariffs against those who dont pay decent salaries. I said decent not outrageouse

The minimum wage in 1970 in todays dollars adjusted for taxes and inflation would be $20/hour.

No, American workers making $25 an hour are not over paid.

That is the cost of hiring free people to work for you instead of wage slaves in India or indentured servants from China.

I hate to say this but what have these american wage earners done to earn more than an indian in india?

 

[Wilbur Right]

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government

No the job creators hands are not tied behind their backs.

Their hands are planted firmly on your wallet and in your pocket and they are helping themselves to your money. LMAO.

 

[JimBowie1958]

That is the cost of hiring free people to work for you instead of wage slaves in India or indentured servants from China.

I hate to say this but what have these american wage earners done to earn more than an indian in india?

So you like the idea of wage slavery? What have you done to earn the protection that these workers have given you by serving in our armed forces? Why shouldn't you be on a ship adrift in the ocean?

Besides, American workers have to live, save and retire here in the US with our scale of living and cost of living.

Asian Indians do not. They make half what American workers would make then go back to Hyderabad wealthy men.

 

[Redfish]

why did American jobs go to China and Mexico? any idea?

Yeah, because American workers make too much, right?

close, but no cigar------------------unions, taxes, and over regulation of all businesses operating in the US. Add open trade policies and you might understand why your Iphone is made in China and your TV in South Korea.

 

[Redfish]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't...they decided they liked the lower salaries

everything in your post is a partisan bullshit lie.

Bush cut taxes for everyone who pays taxes, Obama kept those tax rates in place

There was no "economic collapse" in 08, there was a market correction, nothing more

The so-called bailouts were done to save the UAW and the wall street fat cats who were financing the DNC. I don't recall a "taxpayer vote" for the bailouts, do you?

 

[Wilbur Right]

There was no "economic collapse" in 08, there was a market correction, nothing more

LMAO. I have seen you write some stupid shit............but that was the most stupid remark ever from you. Congratulations.
You have won my idiot of the day award.

 

[Redfish]

There was no "economic collapse" in 08, there was a market correction, nothing more

LMAO. I have seen you write some stupid shit............but that was the most stupid remark ever from you. Congratulations.
You have won my idiot of the day award.

Then it should be easy for you to post the statistics that support that our economy "collapsed" in 08.

We'll be anxiously waiting.

I suggest that you look up the words "economic collapse" before making a further fool of yourself.

 

[rightwinger]

The government can't end poverty......only the "job creators" can do that

They are not doing a good job

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't...they decided they liked the lower salaries

everything in your post is a partisan bullshit lie.

Bush cut taxes for everyone who pays taxes, Obama kept those tax rates in place

There was no "economic collapse" in 08, there was a market correction, nothing more

The so-called bailouts were done to save the UAW and the wall street fat cats who were financing the DNC. I don't recall a "taxpayer vote" for the bailouts, do you?

Too ******* funny to respond to seriously

 

[Redfish]

The job creators have their hands tied behind their back's by an overreaching federal government. Get the govt off the backs of industry and the economy will boom, Trump is the only one who understands that and will make it happen.

We made a deal with our job creators back when Reagan was President

We would cut back taxes and regulations and they would respond with a rising economic tide that brought more jobs and higher salaries

We kept our part of the deal and our job creators decided to just keep the added wealth rather than create more jobs

Yes, and it was happening under both Bushes and Clinton, it stopped when you fools put obozo in the oval office.

It was not happening under Bush

Bush cut taxes and regulations even further than Reagan and led us to the biggest economic collapse in 75 years.
After the taxpayers bailed out the "job creators" and saved them from collapse, did they respond by returning jobs and salaries to their previous levels?

Of course they didn't...they decided they liked the lower salaries

everything in your post is a partisan bullshit lie.

Bush cut taxes for everyone who pays taxes, Obama kept those tax rates in place

There was no "economic collapse" in 08, there was a market correction, nothing more

The so-called bailouts were done to save the UAW and the wall street fat cats who were financing the DNC. I don't recall a "taxpayer vote" for the bailouts, do you?

Too ******* funny to respond to seriously

translation = of course you are correct, so I will hurl some bullshit.

 

[Wilbur Right]

there was a market correction, nothing more

Those that lost homes, life savings and jobs definitely disagree with you as well.

Or were those people all democrat plants? They were weren't they. Democrats who lost homes, jobs and money, they just did that to make Bush look bad. Right?

No republicans or independents suffered did they?