Possible Evidence That Wikileaked Hacked Emails Are Also Forgeries, or Edited(?)!

[mascale]

In another thread, someone tried to tie one of the Trump Sexual Assault accusers to the Clinton Foundation. The Evidence was a phone number, listed as the accuser phone number, apparently deliberately blurred to make it look like the Clinton Foundation phone number. So the accuser would be said to have been using the Clinton Foundation phone number as her own(?)!

Then someone checked out the allegation. The number had been edited, and possibly forged. So may they all have been edited and possibly forged. There are a lot of political hacks to sort through, over at Trump Campaign. The source was a Wikileak email tied to Podesta, or someone else.

ProudBoy MAGAzine on Twitter

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(RNC Screwing People Blind Since 1861! 750,000 White People rounded up, sent off to military camps, to be killed! 4.0 mil. Blacks cast out, (Like the Servant With the insufficient Talents to keep up with everyone else, in Matthew 25:14-30). There would be nothing to show for all their years of labor. (The source being Deuteronomy 23:19-20; anyone can also see Federal Reserve Board, USA, Or Keynesian Economics: "For He Bade The People Bend Over And Await the Public Works(?) ! "Screw 'Em" may be a better translation of all the cited passages, or concepts. Lincoln would further suspend Habeus Corpus, and jail the political opposition or shutter the opposition press! "Screw 'Em!" has a GOP history!)

 

[Norman]

They are not forgeries...

 

[Vastator]

Spin! Spin! Spin like your queens campaign depends on it!

 

[Pamforyoursam]

Nothing Wiki publishes now can be trusted. They are just another partisan house of crap.

 

[mascale]

Hard to say if they are genuine. Likely the Clinton Campaign will issue a caution. They are hacked emails. The Campaign is probably busy fact-checking everything else. Other sources are showing the absence of veracity of everything, without exception, leaked.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(Holy Smoke, unedited, once arose from Lands of Many Nations, plain to all!)

 

[Iceweasel]

Nothing Wiki publishes now can be trusted. They are just another partisan house of crap.

You wish.

emails contain metadata. That's why it was so wrong for Hillary to destroy the evidence.

 

[Pamforyoursam]

Nothing Wiki publishes now can be trusted. They are just another partisan house of crap.

You wish.

emails contain metadata. That's why it was so wrong for Hillary to destroy the evidence.

Do you actually know what metadata is?

 

[Auld Phart]

In another thread, someone tried to tie one of the Trump Sexual Assault accusers to the Clinton Foundation. The Evidence was a phone number, listed as the accuser phone number, apparently deliberately blurred to make it look like the Clinton Foundation phone number. So the accuser would be said to have been using the Clinton Foundation phone number as her own(?)!

Then someone checked out the allegation. The number had been edited, and possibly forged. So may they all have been edited and possibly forged. There are a lot of political hacks to sort through, over at Trump Campaign. The source was a Wikileak email tied to Podesta, or someone else.

ProudBoy MAGAzine on Twitter

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(RNC Screwing People Blind Since 1861! 750,000 White People rounded up, sent off to military camps, to be killed! 4.0 mil. Blacks cast out, (Like the Servant With the insufficient Talents to keep up with everyone else, in Matthew 25:14-30). There would be nothing to show for all their years of labor. (The source being Deuteronomy 23:19-20; anyone can also see Federal Reserve Board, USA, Or Keynesian Economics: "For He Bade The People Bend Over And Await the Public Works(?) ! "Screw 'Em" may be a better translation of all the cited passages, or concepts. Lincoln would further suspend Habeus Corpus, and jail the political opposition or shutter the opposition press! "Screw 'Em!" has a GOP history!)

 

[Iceweasel]

Hard to say if they are genuine.

No dumb ass. Real easy. Those challenging the authenticity can submit their copies for comparison. So far no one has.

 

[hadit]

Nothing Wiki publishes now can be trusted. They are just another partisan house of crap.

Let's see if we have this straight. Emails are released and the one most embarrassed by them says they could be faked. This you take as gospel that nothing can be trusted? Hysterical.

 

[Iceweasel]

Nothing Wiki publishes now can be trusted. They are just another partisan house of crap.

You wish.

emails contain metadata. That's why it was so wrong for Hillary to destroy the evidence.

Do you actually know what metadata is?

Obviously you don't.

What is metadata?
Simply put, metadata is data about data. It is descriptive information about a particular data set, object, or resource, including how it is formatted, and when and by whom it was collected.

 

[Meathead]

It's easy. Let the Beast's camp say so.

 

[mascale]

Someone is a thief. The thief probably sold the stolen property for money. The thief probably doctored up some juicy ones to get a higher price. Maybe the Wikileaker got a grant from the Trump Foundation(?)! All kinds of politicians are being charged with having profited from the Trump Foundation.

So in Trump Reality, mostly there is a firm believe that the only credible sources are thieves, forgers, and anyone indicted(?)!

Trump supporters famously want a law-breaker for a leader, like a Billy The Kid or Jesse James kind of hero.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Wyatt Burp(?) Earp(?) even has funny name--but not an outlaw(?)!)

 

[Iceweasel]

Someone is a thief. The thief probably sold the stolen property for money. The thief probably doctored up some juicy ones to get a higher price. Maybe the Wikileaker got a grant from the Trump Foundation(?)! All kinds of politicians are being charged with having profited from the Trump Foundation.

So in Trump Reality, mostly there is a firm believe that the only credible sources are thieves, forgers, and anyone indicted(?)!

Trump supporters famously want a law-breaker for a leader, like a Billy The Kid or Jesse James kind of hero.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Wyatt Burp(?) Earp(?) even has funny name--but not an outlaw(?)!)

Your logic is as watertight as swiss cheese.

 

[mascale]

The Trump Campaign is in with the thieves, on which it is relying: WikiDoctoredAndForgedLeaks, and from an "Undisclosed Location," most likely!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes Shoot Many Arrows In The Sky: Only getting tiny few to land on moon(?), unable to find any nations to steal from(?)!)

 

[hadit]

Someone is a thief. The thief probably sold the stolen property for money. The thief probably doctored up some juicy ones to get a higher price. Maybe the Wikileaker got a grant from the Trump Foundation(?)! All kinds of politicians are being charged with having profited from the Trump Foundation.

So in Trump Reality, mostly there is a firm believe that the only credible sources are thieves, forgers, and anyone indicted(?)!

Trump supporters famously want a law-breaker for a leader, like a Billy The Kid or Jesse James kind of hero.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Wyatt Burp(?) Earp(?) even has funny name--but not an outlaw(?)!)

Probably? Maybe? Yeah, take that to the bank.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Definite evidence you are a complete whackjob?