I was just asking the question. After years of defending not only porn and vulgarity, but demanding that the taxpayer pay for it through the NEA and such, Democrats are now claiming that it was a bad thing that a company that produces porn found it more economical to work in Texas than California?
Really?
Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative
Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.