Popper when asked if falsifiability is itself falsifiable or if it fails its own criteria

[zaangalewa]

We know the material world exists. We can study the material world.

What is "to study"? In a bio-psychological view this is a change - an experience - in the material structure of the matter of a concrete brain. But what I say about here is now an immaterial idea. An idea, which is by the way plausible but still without evidence. Example of an alternating idea: In case our brain would be something like a smart phone for our spirit then the one who reads the messages of this phone is not a part of the material of the handy. When you will study this material then you are only able to get very indirectly some knowledge. How to find out in such a case that the producers of the hypothetical machines, which are producing smart phones, are made from biological entities with two arms and hands? I guess who thinks materialistic thinks often only very poor - without to trust in god and the fantasy it needs for a blind chicken to find a corn and sometimes a corn schnapps too.

You for example existed once before any atom started to build your body and your brain. Evidence: Someone with a time machine could travel a million years back into the past and do something there so you never will be born - ah sorry: so you never was born. And I'm in this case now so crazy to speak with a not existing nothing. This shows clear a million years ago existed something, which was leading to this what you are now. But this what you was a million years ago was part of an "invisible world" - or do you see all around you the souls of the future beings, whose destiny you are now?

 

[zaangalewa]

If I got the attributions mixed up, I apologize. They got kind of entangled, lol.

As well the sentence "god exists" and the sentence "god not exists" makes not a big sense in philsophy and/or science. For believers in god it's not clear what the word "exists" means in case of the "the creator". The question "Did god exist when he had created existence per se"? shows this very well. God transcendends existence - our existence is in this case part of a meta-existence of god. And for the believers in atheism the question is just simle: "Why exists something at all?" or "Why exists existence?".

Agreed, God transcends our existence. He created space and time from nothing which is our reality. Our reality could cease to exist but God's reality would continue on. Eternal and unchanging.

It is interesting to me that Einstein has basically proven that, through his Laws of Relativity as applied in the Big Bang theory, time is finite and did not always exist.

Wherever the flow of time ultimately came from,

It came "from" a nowhen without this flow - "from" a timeless situation.

however many iterations of creation you care to supposed, ultimately time had a start somewhere from something that exists outside the flow of time.

Or from nothing at all. Perhaps it is on an unknown reason for the nature of nothing not easy to be nothing or ot is necessary for "the nothing" to be not nothing too.(Not nothing is something - so an "extreme" nothing has perhaps inevitably to be something.)

This in turn means that that being that is outside of time has 0 flow of time and Relativity says that this entity is thus infinite in mass and energy.

This "entity" - if possible to say so - is outside of space, time, matter and energy by being not creation but creator. Only the creation is under influence of the "relative factor" (gamma factor, Lorentz factor) of the theory of relativity. The expression 1 − v^2 / c^2 shows by the way a half circle for v<c

Cantors Continuum Theory,

Cantor?

which is mathematically solid is defined as the 'set of all possible sets'. As applied to Reality this would mean that the Creator, which is infinite, would have a mind and personality as well.

No no. Cantor found a or the fundament of mathematics and was a solution for the so called "existential crisis of Mathematics". Nevertheless mathematics on its own is not a materialistic science. Mathematics is a world full of ideas.

This is not speculative, these are firmly established laws of science and mathematical theory, in fact Set theory is the foundation of Modern Mathematics.

So it is.

Don't fall for the oligarchs of the Wests lie that God does not exist or that there is any plausible reason to doubt that He does.

Existence is not a problem for god. If he should exists not now then he could exist a second later. Was god existing when he created everything out of nothing - specially when he started to create the existence per se?

but your beliefs are fabrications ... without empiricism and falsibility.

Why not fabricate two (2) “Gods” or gods, or more? Why not make up a “reality” where one god’s domain ends and another one’s starts? Or, both interact?

Anyone can make up “convenient” ideas, but our reality needs SOME empiricism, or it’s not falsifiable or science (knowledge).
Religious faith is equivalent to “i don’t know, but it sounds good to ME”.

No, these falsehoods stem from your ignorance about religion and science. Religion is not science, obviously, and does not have to stand for empirical confirmation.

Short: What you said is indeed without substance. Your belief in atheism means: "You don't know, but it sounds good to you".

Few atheists have any inkling or idea about what God really is, and so they rightly reject their own delusions about God, but not God as accurately conceived of.

[/Quote]

The problem for atheists is to understand what's the difference between their belief and their knowledge.