Pompeo verbally assaulted an NPR reporter.

[IM2]

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news

Fake like your patriotism.

Patriotism isn't about blind worship of a lying sack of shit.

 

[Crepitus]

Lying to liars dont count

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

"Verbally Assaulted"?

Is that something like "hurting a snowflakes feelings"?

Or maybe "not taking someone's bullshit"?

View attachment 302364

No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people - there is a email trail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...93cf0e-4071-11ea-b503-2b077c436617_story.html

Thank you, I knew someone would publish that for us eventually.

 

[Coyote]

There was no ambush. The topics were cleared with Pompeo's staff (with email chain to support it). Can you stop lying?

Try to calm down.

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed.

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.

Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

I'm responding to the parts in blue.

First - whistle blower reports need to be determined to be credible. They are investigated. That weeds out false charges. In this case they were found to be credible per the agency head.

Second part. The Bidens may have been part of the reason for the call but they did not participate in the call. What could they add to the charges either for or against?

AGAIN - if you have evidence of corruption that merits it's own investigation. The fact that there has been none despite 3 years of largely Republican control kind of indicates there might not be much to the accusations. YOU guys control things. The Senate can request investigations and the Dems can not do anything about it. The President has agencies at his disposal who can investigate. Why haven't they? Three years.

 

[Coyote]

Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.

Doesn't matter what Schiff says. It violates the whistle blower protection law for intelligence agencies.

Legal scholars say you are wrong.

The law as written says I am right. There is a different standard for whistle blowers in intelligence agencies - a different set of protections. Maybe your legal scholars don't realize that.

 

[IM2]

trump has been impeached by the democrats in congress.

Its not a real impeachment. Hell its not even a half impeachment Dem's couldn't even convince all the Dems to vote for impeachment let alone a single Republican.

It is a real impeachment. All the democrats are not required to vote for impeachment. Republicans are covering this up with trump hoping to stay in power.

Its a joke impeachment, my sore loser Dems with a pouty face. Again not even all Dems voted for impeachment, sorry you lose, again, MAGA!!

No, it's legit. And your last sentence is disingenuous since only 2 democrats didn't vote for impeachment. 99 percent of the democrats did vote for impeachment.

 

[Crepitus]

He clearly lied.
No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news

Fake like your patriotism.

Patriotism isn't about blind worship of a lying sack of shit.

Damn right!

 

[Crepitus]

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news

But the rest if us know better, and we are the ones who count.

 

[BluesLegend]

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.

Doesn't matter what Schiff says. It violates the whistle blower protection law for intelligence agencies.

Legal scholars say you are wrong.

The law as written says I am right. There is a different standard for whistle blowers in intelligence agencies - a different set of protections. Maybe your legal scholars don't realize that.

First you need to explain why Schiff said the whistleblower should testify, we are waiting.

 

[BluesLegend]

trump has been impeached by the democrats in congress.

Its not a real impeachment. Hell its not even a half impeachment Dem's couldn't even convince all the Dems to vote for impeachment let alone a single Republican.

It is a real impeachment. All the democrats are not required to vote for impeachment. Republicans are covering this up with trump hoping to stay in power.

Its a joke impeachment, my sore loser Dems with a pouty face. Again not even all Dems voted for impeachment, sorry you lose, again, MAGA!!

No, it's legit. And your last sentence is disingenuous since only 2 democrats didn't vote for impeachment. 99 percent of the democrats did vote for impeachment.

Too bad you couldn't even convince or threaten all the Dems into voting yes. Sucks to be you man.

 

[IM2]

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news

Fake like your patriotism.

Patriotism isn't about blind worship of a lying sack of shit.

Damn right!

View attachment 302724

I high five'd you.

 

[IM2]

trump has been impeached by the democrats in congress.

Its not a real impeachment. Hell its not even a half impeachment Dem's couldn't even convince all the Dems to vote for impeachment let alone a single Republican.

It is a real impeachment. All the democrats are not required to vote for impeachment. Republicans are covering this up with trump hoping to stay in power.

Its a joke impeachment, my sore loser Dems with a pouty face. Again not even all Dems voted for impeachment, sorry you lose, again, MAGA!!

No, it's legit. And your last sentence is disingenuous since only 2 democrats didn't vote for impeachment. 99 percent of the democrats did vote for impeachment.

Too bad you couldn't even convince or threaten all the Dems into voting yes. Sucks to be you man.

Too bad you have to hang on to disingenuous statements.

 

[Coyote]

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.

Doesn't matter what Schiff says. It violates the whistle blower protection law for intelligence agencies.

Legal scholars say you are wrong.

The law as written says I am right. There is a different standard for whistle blowers in intelligence agencies - a different set of protections. Maybe your legal scholars don't realize that.

First you need to explain why Schiff said the whistleblower should testify, we are waiting.

Umh....what? Why do I have to explain anything Schiff says or does? I don't care. It DOES NOT change the law.

Keep waiting.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lying to liars dont count

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

"Verbally Assaulted"?

Is that something like "hurting a snowflakes feelings"?

Or maybe "not taking someone's bullshit"?

View attachment 302364

No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

She does. In writing.

Bullshit.

You have no integrity, as everyone on this board well knows, and neither does Mary Louise Kelly. She lied to get him on the show and then ambushed him, a common tactic with the sleazy demagogues of the leftist press.

 

[Coyote]

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

She does. In writing.

Bullshit.

You have no integrity, as everyone on this board well knows, and neither does Mary Louise Kelly. She lied to get him on the show and then ambushed him, a common tactic with the sleazy demagogues of the leftist press.

She didn't lie. That's been debunked.

 

[Crepitus]

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.

Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.

No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch

No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

She does. In writing.

Bullshit.

You have no integrity, as everyone on this board well knows, and neither does Mary Louise Kelly. She lied to get him on the show and then ambushed him, a common tactic with the sleazy demagogues of the leftist press.

Sorry kid, but it's a fact.

There's an email chain.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.

Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

No, whistleblowers can and do testify, Coyote. The reason why the dems don't want him to testify is that it would expose the shenanigans with Schiff.
Not to mention that he wouldn't qualify as a whistleblower in the first place.
The issue of Biden? This is the crux of the impeachment proceedings, yes...Jr. is
very relevant. What are the democrats hiding regarding the Bidens?

Meister, there is no issue with Biden. Trump approved money to Ukraine in 2017-18. What you believe is a lie, so please stop lying.

If there is no issue with Biden, we should have him as a witness, along with the whistleblower.

Eric Ciaramella. The so called "whistleblower" is Eric Ciaramella. Did the little Goebbels keep Linda Tripp's name secret? This idea that we're supposed to cover up for the traitor Ciaramella is bullshit. I won't be part of it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There was no ambush. The topics were cleared with Pompeo's staff (with email chain to support it). Can you stop lying?

Try to calm down.

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed.

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.

Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

LMAO the Biden's corruption is at the center of impeachment and the Biden's should not be called as witnesses? You are also forgetting Schiff said the whistleblower should be called as a witness.

Getting Eric Ciaramella on the stand would be interesting.

Agent Ciaramella, how long have you worked for the CIA? What are the laws regarding domestic spying? Is engaging in espionage against the president of the United States and act of treason? What is your relationship with KGB John Brennan? When did Adam Schitt cook up the whistleblower scam with you? Are you aware that lying on the whistleblower complaint is perjury? What is your relationship with Joe Biden? What is your relationship with Alexandra Chalupa?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I think you trumpers need a reality check. You guys are all in here running your mouths off about a certain and guaranteed trump landslide re election in November.

Let's take a look at your candidate.

He's been impeached. Now this means he starts off bad no matter what you in the 30 percent cult believe. trump is about to get pounded this fall by a relentless media campaign that is going to use his obstruction in this and the Mueller cases against him. And that will just be one part of trumps woes. That hunter biden shit isn't going to fool the majority of Americans. Calling Warren pocahontas for 3 months will not get him re elected. Joe Biden will rip him to shreds on both domestic and foreign policy. He will gut trump when it comes to his claims about the economy. trump is cutting food stamps and trying to cut social security, these things are going to be unleashed on trump and spelling covfefe on twitter is all he'll be left to do. trump is going to get carved up this fall.

It's not an impeachment, it's election tampering.

That's all it is.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He clearly lied.
No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?

Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news

Fake like your patriotism.

Patriotism isn't about blind worship of a lying sack of shit.

Commie please......

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed.

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.

Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

I'm responding to the parts in blue.

First - whistle blower reports need to be determined to be credible. They are investigated. That weeds out false charges. In this case they were found to be credible per the agency head.

Second part. The Bidens may have been part of the reason for the call but they did not participate in the call. What could they add to the charges either for or against?

AGAIN - if you have evidence of corruption that merits it's own investigation. The fact that there has been none despite 3 years of largely Republican control kind of indicates there might not be much to the accusations. YOU guys control things. The Senate can request investigations and the Dems can not do anything about it. The President has agencies at his disposal who can investigate. Why haven't they? Three years.

But we know that Eric Ciaramella lied. The transcripts released by the President proved that the CIA operation was a fraud and that Agent Ciaramella was lying in conjunction with Adam Schitt to defame and slander the POTUS in an attempt to remove him from office (an act of treason)