He’s conjuring up another witch huntgrowing numbers since theiy're a rising threat
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/SY24MBNY7ZOEFPCN6PGPCBBCDM.jpg)
White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says
Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.www.reuters.com
Unlikely since I'm not planning on trying to overthrow the government like you kids did.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injusticewww.independent.co.uk
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.www.reuters.com
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat
White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says
Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
I'm not asking you to "trust" anything I say as fact based just on my authority.
No one would.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
I'm not asking you to "trust" anything I say as fact based just on my authority.No one would.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
I'm not asking you to "trust" anything I say as fact based just on my authority.No one would.
Actually, i think my years of consistency and honesty, a lot of people would. At least among those that don't project their own basic lack of honesty.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
I'm not asking you to "trust" anything I say as fact based just on my authority.No one would.
Actually, i think my years of consistency and honesty, a lot of people would. At least among those that don't project their own basic lack of honesty.
Only those who don’t know better. You’re a real Nostradumbass alright.
LOLOLDumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.LOLOLLOLYou're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.LOLOLYour point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.LOLOLOLOLDumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?Sadly for you, none others have been identified.So then all you have is one.There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...One.False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones
Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims
Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice
The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.
Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
That would be your irrelevant opinion.
The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.
How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?
How do you know that was the only one?
I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.
I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.
If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.
Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.
That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.
There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.
Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.
No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies
FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.
Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.
ZERO.
If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.
Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.
no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.
You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.
My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.
It thus is a plausible and valid belief.
Don't fear reality, embrace it.
The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?
**** THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.
And still more cred than a whining peon like you.
Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.
I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.
That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.
Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.
Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.
Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".
That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.
Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.
Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.
That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.
Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.
Thanks for helping me prove my point.
You're such aretard.
There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.
He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.
To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.
AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.
There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.
I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.
The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".
But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.
That is the ******* point.
iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.
I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.
The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....
The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.But you can?
I'm not asking you to "trust" anything I say as fact based just on my authority.No one would.
Actually, i think my years of consistency and honesty, a lot of people would. At least among those that don't project their own basic lack of honesty.Only those who don’t know better. You’re a real Nostradumbass alright.
Nobody is taking a census of white supremacists.growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat
White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says
Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.
How ******* many? Are you retarded? I asked a simple question. HOW ******* MANY?
Nobody is taking a census of white supremacists.growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat
White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says
Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.
How ******* many? Are you retarded? I asked a simple question. HOW ******* MANY?
Incidents of white supremacist propaganda hit an all-time high in 2020, according to a new report from the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism, which has tracked racist propaganda for decades. anti-Semitic, racist and anti-LGBTQ+ posters, flyers and graffiti were recorded 5,125 times in 2020, according to the report, almost twice the number of incidents recorded in 2019.
The report, released today, details incidents in every state excluding Hawaii. It includes 130 incidents of white supremacists putting up banners, 56 in-person white supremacist events and 283 incidents of anti-Semitc language or propaganda that specifically targeted Jewish institutions, a 68% increase from 2019.
The most recent indicator is how white supremacists are now openly accepted:Nobody is taking a census of white supremacists.growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat
White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says
Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.
How ******* many? Are you retarded? I asked a simple question. HOW ******* MANY?
Incidents of white supremacist propaganda hit an all-time high in 2020, according to a new report from the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism, which has tracked racist propaganda for decades. anti-Semitic, racist and anti-LGBTQ+ posters, flyers and graffiti were recorded 5,125 times in 2020, according to the report, almost twice the number of incidents recorded in 2019.
The report, released today, details incidents in every state excluding Hawaii. It includes 130 incidents of white supremacists putting up banners, 56 in-person white supremacist events and 283 incidents of anti-Semitc language or propaganda that specifically targeted Jewish institutions, a 68% increase from 2019.
The President says that they are a big problem. I hear liberals talking all the time about how big of a problem they are.
Yet when I ask how many of them there are, no one can ever tell me.
How can you claim that they are a big problem, when you don't have any idea how many of them there are?
thehill.com
