Better accept it, muddy. We're never going to disappear. The desire of the people not to be disposable cogs in the corporate wheel, not to be downtrodden wage-slaves, not to live their lives in servitude to private greed, is just one of those things that's too hard to exterminate. Like cockroaches. Or blackberries.
Progressives ranks swelled because Liberal became a dirty word and they felt the label meant they support progress. Actually it means the opposite in the economy. Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between a Progressive and a Libertarian except when it comes to the economy, then they're totally opposite.
No, not totally opposite. Progressives and libertarians oppose corporate welfare, and oppose using government force to crack down on labor unions. We also agree about the stupidity of providing corporations with tax breaks to encourage outsourcing. Basically, any time that the government is actively
helping the greedy to abuse and exploit the people, progressives (or liberals) and libertarians are in agreement that the government should stop doing that, just as we agree that the government should not infringe the personal liberty of the people directly, e.g. through the criminalization of drugs, unnecessary wars, or violation of civil liberties.
Where we part company is that libertarians are slow to recognize the potential threat to liberty and well-being that corporate greed poses even when the government
doesn't directly help it out. Just as the state should protect the people's lives and property against murderers and thieves, so it should protect their lives, livelihoods, and liberty against corporate exploiters. That's our view. Libertarians disagree. But not because they don't agree with us about the motives of the corporate rich: just because they don't think those motives would be empowered to do harm without active government help.
So really, the two philosophies are a lot closer than you might suppose.