Poll for Democrats - would it worry you that a son of Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch votes for the same candidate you do?

Democrats, does it concern/worry you when a Murdoch dumps $$$ into a Democrat's campaign?

  • No, not at all, I don't care about anything except the size of my government check

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • kinda/sorta, I'd like to know what Murdoch's angle is doing that....

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, it might cause me to change my vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, 100%, I would never vote for anyone funded by the Fox News Murdoch klan

    Votes: 1 50.0%

  • Total voters
    2

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,998
Reaction score
18,281
Points
2,788
We have seen it here many times. Democrat supporters do not like Fox News and call it all sorts of names, including "right wing" and "fascist."

So when a son of Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, pours big time $$$ into the campaign of a Democrat, does that concern you ... make you pause and ask why...???
 
Start the Jeopardy! music....


Not many Dems here want to answer that question...
 
The DOCTOR, that's me, has documented that

RACISM doesn't matter to Democrats when the Democrats do it
GAZA Genocide doesn't matter to Democrats when the Democrat candidate supports it


and this topic is already proving

Fox News doesn't matter as long as it supports... THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE...



That the correct answer to the poll is 100% of Democrats answering 1, that the only thing that matters is the size of that government check...
 
We have seen it here many times. Democrat supporters do not like Fox News and call it all sorts of names, including "right wing" and "fascist."

So when a son of Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, pours big time $$$ into the campaign of a Democrat, does that concern you ... make you pause and ask why...???
You republicans are funny. You gave us Citizens United. So now what rich people do is play both sides. Publically they donate to Democrats. Privately/dark money goes to Republicans, project 2025, etc. And Rupert giving you money is like being endorsed by Dick Chaney.

I'm not comfortable with this:

Trump says the Murdochs will most likely have a role in the U.S. TikTok deal​

The president also said Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, would be a part of the deal for the social media platform.

President Donald Trump on Sunday suggested that media mogul Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan, who lead News Corp. and Fox Corp., are involved in the deal for U.S. control of TikTok.

"They're very well-known people," Trump told Fox News' "The Sunday Briefing" when asked about who was involved in the TikTok deal.


"Larry Ellison is one of them. He’s involved. This great guy, Michael Dell is involved. I hate to tell you this, but a man named Lachlan is involved. Do you know who Lachlan is? That’s a very unusual name, Lachlan Murdoch," the president added.
 
We have seen it here many times. Democrat supporters do not like Fox News and call it all sorts of names, including "right wing" and "fascist."

So when a son of Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, pours big time $$$ into the campaign of a Democrat, does that concern you ... make you pause and ask why...???
That is an interesting question. I don't think you have attract any Dems to answer, yet, but will be interesting if you do. It is well known big companies donate on both sides, hoping to hedge their bets, even if their preferred candidate looses. Donald Trump being a good example, along with FOX/Murdoch and many big corporations, easily able to outspend actual voters. I am no tax expert person, but don't they actually get some kind of tax break on expenses, like that? I never agreed with that "corporations are people, too" theory, but it is, what it is, under the law.
 
Don’t care about Murdoch
 
That is an interesting question. I don't think you have attract any Dems to answer, yet, but will be interesting if you do. It is well known big companies donate on both sides, hoping to hedge their bets, even if their preferred candidate looses. Donald Trump being a good example, along with FOX/Murdoch and many big corporations, easily able to outspend actual voters. I am no tax expert person, but don't they actually get some kind of tax break on expenses, like that? I never agreed with that "corporations are people, too" theory, but it is, what it is, under the law.
I voted but only because I couldn't unselect the one I thought was the least ridiculous.

I heard one of Murdock's kids isn't as big of a dick as the other kid. It's like Liz Chaney isn't as bad as Dick.

Fox News under the Murdoch's purposely, knowingly lies to it's viewers. That fact came out in the Dominion lawsuit.

Be careful. The Murdoch's might be trying to ruin this Democrats name by donating to them.

We should get Soros to donate to Republicans.
 
The president also said Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, would be a part of the deal for the social media platform.


I'm good with that.
 
I am no tax expert person, but don't they actually get some kind of tax break on expenses, like that?


They may, given the tax code is 16 light years in length... but if they do, maybe it should be DOGE-ed...
 
The Murdoch's might be trying to ruin this Democrats name by donating to them


Doubt it. They haven't been reporting it on Fox News... LOL!!!

If it IS REAL NEWS, it is NEVER ON FOX or MSNBC or any of the others...


The donations by James Murdoch and his wife appear to be personal donations, not corporate. And I only got to page 5 on the Spanberger donor list, which is over 100 pages long, but done by largest first, the largest being Reid Hoffman, who lives in California....
 
I'm good with that.

Proof what a brainwashed fool you are. As a conservative you should know better than to trust those corporations with your information any more than you trust government.

And you should not trust billionaires to run our government.

Yet here we are. The rich are taking over our country and half of our middle class prefer a corporatocrisy over Democracy.
 
I voted but only because I couldn't unselect the one I thought was the least ridiculous.

I heard one of Murdock's kids isn't as big of a dick as the other kid. It's like Liz Chaney isn't as bad as Dick.

Fox News under the Murdoch's purposely, knowingly lies to it's viewers. That fact came out in the Dominion lawsuit.

Be careful. The Murdoch's might be trying to ruin this Democrats name by donating to them.

We should get Soros to donate to Republicans.
"get Soros to donate to Republicans." Now that's Funny!:D
 
Proof what a brainwashed fool you are. As a conservative you should know better than to trust those corporations with your information any more than you trust government.

And you should not trust billionaires to run our government.

Yet here we are. The rich are taking over our country and half of our middle class prefer a corporatocrisy over Democracy.



There are a lot of snakes and traitors in big tech.

Mike Dell is one of the "good guys" relatively.
 
We have seen it here many times. Democrat supporters do not like Fox News and call it all sorts of names, including "right wing" and "fascist."

So when a son of Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, pours big time $$$ into the campaign of a Democrat, does that concern you ... make you pause and ask why...???
I care about Daddy because he has such oversized influence on US politics. Why should I care what his son says or does?

You actually might get Dems to take your poll if you avoid putting in silly poison pills like "I don't care about anything except the size of my government check".
 
Well, so far, only one Democrat here has voted. Thank You.


The point is that what comes out of Democrats' mouths on a daily basis....

racism
Gaza
Fox News = bad bad bad


is just noise, it doesn't matter at all, what matters is that the Democrat Party is 99% a conspiracy to steal from the American Taxpayer, and the words they use in public to justify themselves are all 100% outed as BS in the current VA Gov race.
 
15th post
We have seen it here many times. Democrat supporters do not like Fox News and call it all sorts of names, including "right wing" and "fascist."

So when a son of Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, pours big time $$$ into the campaign of a Democrat, does that concern you ... make you pause and ask why...???

DICK CHENEY votes for the same candidates the DemoKKKrats vote for. And they LOVE him for it.
 
"get Soros to donate to Republicans." Now that's Funny!:D


It will be worth it. He publicly gives $1 million (nothing to him) to a Republican and hopefully that costs them votes.

Not only did Chaney endorse Kamala, so did Putin. How did that work out for her?
 
You republicans are funny. You gave us Citizens United. So now what rich people do is play both sides. Publically they donate to Democrats. Privately/dark money goes to Republicans, project 2025, etc. And Rupert giving you money is like being endorsed by Dick Chaney.

I'm not comfortable with this:

Trump says the Murdochs will most likely have a role in the U.S. TikTok deal​

The president also said Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, would be a part of the deal for the social media platform.

President Donald Trump on Sunday suggested that media mogul Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan, who lead News Corp. and Fox Corp., are involved in the deal for U.S. control of TikTok.

"They're very well-known people," Trump told Fox News' "The Sunday Briefing" when asked about who was involved in the TikTok deal.


"Larry Ellison is one of them. He’s involved. This great guy, Michael Dell is involved. I hate to tell you this, but a man named Lachlan is involved. Do you know who Lachlan is? That’s a very unusual name, Lachlan Murdoch," the president added.
Murdock, Cheney, W, the turtle and Michelle Obama are all the same. They're modern-day user barons.
 
It will be worth it. He publicly gives $1 million (nothing to him) to a Republican and hopefully that costs them votes.

Not only did Chaney endorse Kamala, so did Putin. How did that work out for her?
Worked out as expected. Her picture should be used as illustration for explanations of "The Peter Principle".
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom