Politicians: Diversity is what makes us great!

agree with your post number 158 but the big problem in the USA is legal importation of third worlders into the USA Pilot ,
 
We have long been a country where we start off diverse and work towards commonality. This is a very good thing and good for our country.

In current usage among the intelectually benighted multiculturalists, people start of diverse and REMAIN diverse. They are then pitted against others for the good of nobody.

Diversity is now just a code word used by globalists wanting to destablize Western nations by flooding them with people from incomparable cultures and who have absolutely no desire to assimilate.

Weird that our founders were completely aware of this 200 years ago huh?
They framed the Naturalization Act Of 1790 the way they did for a reason didn’t they?
Only the right wing doesn't believe in natural rights. Our Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral, from Inception.
 
No reason for diversity in the USA in my opinion . It simply leads to having to deal with foreign ways and foreign thinking . [see 'ilham omar' and 'talib' and their Imported 'somali' electors ] . And then laws , rules and regulations change to accommodate diversity. Many foreigners for example want to modify American Gun Rights and Freedom of Speech in the USA . I see that as a poor trade just to have a 'somali' killer/murderer ' on the Minnesota police force .

Diversity is not an all exclusive item. It makes a world of difference who composes that element of diversity.

That is the huge mistake that has been made regarding diversity. The liberals have loaded the dice so to speak by convincing so many that all divesity is good. Simply not the case.

If you talk about the French, the Eyeties, the Germans, the Dutch, the Scandanavians, the Russians, and other Europeans and even Asians then diversity is a good thing because they are intelligent, educated groups that help America. We do not need to be bringing in the elements that are low i.q., and or that have membership in the most intolerant religion in the World.

Forcing diversity on society is like forcing a man and woman who hate each other to marry. In most cases, diversity only makes one party happy at the disadvantage of the other.

That begs the question of why diversity at all? I'd be quite happy living with people of my own race, and happier with people of my own ethnic background. Why is it others need to diversify with us?
------------------------------- they , the gov build a fractured society that they then get taxpayer paid jobs to manage Ray .
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
My brothers company moved hq to Ireland to save taxes but operates here in Michigan. They hired 500 people. That’s pretty good for Michigan. Michigan doesn’t care what nationality those 500 are.

Well, they are Indians and Chinese. White men in Michigan are not qualified to do these jobs. So diversity does make us great

Are you suggesting the corporations are lying? Then maybe you should have thought about that before you voted republican.
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.

I am believer in bad cultures, not inherently bad races. Of bad cultures America is currently afflicted with many. Diversity, however, as it pertains to many races living together productively all under the banner of American culture is definitely a great American strength. So long as some meaningful degree of assimilation occurs on the behalf of newly introduced ethnic groups, seems to me there's nothing much to worry about and much benefit to be harvested for our nation as a whole. However, when a radically different culture is dropped point blank among a generationally established and accepted American culture, that's another story indeed and often bad things will result, particularly if said new, hostile culture refuses to assimilate. Additionally, bad domestic cultures exist as well, such as inner city gangsta and narco-terror ones, but in their cases it is more a matter of their refusal to assimilate to the culture of American justice and law. If we could solve the issue of bad cultures seems to me no one would be mentioning race at all in diversification conversations.

Which comes first culture or race? Obviously the race creates the culture. You cannot have one without the other.

You really do not understand what you are saying. To solve the issue of bad cultures and there certainly are bad cultures you would have to destroy the race. That is what Hitler tried to do with the Jews. He was convinced the Jews had a bad culture.

The best we can do is to keep those people out of America. Not talking about the Jews though.




Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.

I am believer in bad cultures, not inherently bad races. Of bad cultures America is currently afflicted with many. Diversity, however, as it pertains to many races living together productively all under the banner of American culture is definitely a great American strength. So long as some meaningful degree of assimilation occurs on the behalf of newly introduced ethnic groups, seems to me there's nothing much to worry about and much benefit to be harvested for our nation as a whole. However, when a radically different culture is dropped point blank among a generationally established and accepted American culture, that's another story indeed and often bad things will result, particularly if said new, hostile culture refuses to assimilate. Additionally, bad domestic cultures exist as well, such as inner city gangsta and narco-terror ones, but in their cases it is more a matter of their refusal to assimilate to the culture of American justice and law. If we could solve the issue of bad cultures seems to me no one would be mentioning race at all in diversification conversations.
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.

I am believer in bad cultures, not inherently bad races. Of bad cultures America is currently afflicted with many. Diversity, however, as it pertains to many races living together productively all under the banner of American culture is definitely a great American strength. So long as some meaningful degree of assimilation occurs on the behalf of newly introduced ethnic groups, seems to me there's nothing much to worry about and much benefit to be harvested for our nation as a whole. However, when a radically different culture is dropped point blank among a generationally established and accepted American culture, that's another story indeed and often bad things will result, particularly if said new, hostile culture refuses to assimilate. Additionally, bad domestic cultures exist as well, such as inner city gangsta and narco-terror ones, but in their cases it is more a matter of their refusal to assimilate to the culture of American justice and law. If we could solve the issue of bad cultures seems to me no one would be mentioning race at all in diversification conversations.
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
My brothers company moved hq to Ireland to save taxes but operates here in Michigan. They hired 500 people. That’s pretty good for Michigan. Michigan doesn’t care what nationality those 500 are.

Well, they are Indians and Chinese. White men in Michigan are not qualified to do these jobs. So diversity does make us great

Are you suggesting the corporations are lying? Then maybe you should have thought about that before you voted republican.

Chinese and Indians are good and itelligent people and they can and do contribute. Their children assimilate quite well and usually are very successful

You really do not understand our immigration problem. The .problem being we have allowed millions of people to come in who in no way measure up to the Chinese or the Indians. These people that are a problem have nothing to contribute but cheap labor if that. Many of them just come here to milk the cash cow and get on welfare as quickly as possible and take advantage of our policies of helping immigrants more than we help our own people.
 
Which comes first culture or race? Obviously the race creates the culture. You cannot have one without the other.

You really do not understand what you are saying. To solve the issue of bad cultures and there certainly are bad cultures you would have to destroy the race. That is what Hitler tried to do with the Jews. He was convinced the Jews had a bad culture.

The best we can do is to keep those people out of America. Not talking about the Jews though.

Race usually reflects the culture. However people of the same culture can live in peace regardless of race.

Our laws are designed to force people of different races to live together which in most cases, means forcing people of different cultures to live together. That's why it's always been a failure.

If we didn't have these laws, and allowed individuals to decide who they wish to live with, or how they wish to protect their community, then eventually, diversity could work. But people have to decide that on their own, not government.
 
agree with your post number 158 but the big problem in the USA is legal importation of third worlders into the USA Pilot ,

Especially the importation of Muslim refugees. Obama brought in a bunch and dumped them on communities with NO warning, and that didn't want them. Hillary was going to bring in even more as part of a campaign promise and goal. Thankfully, Hilary LOST.
 
Which comes first culture or race? Obviously the race creates the culture. You cannot have one without the other.

You really do not understand what you are saying. To solve the issue of bad cultures and there certainly are bad cultures you would have to destroy the race. That is what Hitler tried to do with the Jews. He was convinced the Jews had a bad culture.

The best we can do is to keep those people out of America. Not talking about the Jews though.

Race usually reflects the culture. However people of the same culture can live in peace regardless of race.

Our laws are designed to force people of different races to live together which in most cases, means forcing people of different cultures to live together. That's why it's always been a failure.

If we didn't have these laws, and allowed individuals to decide who they wish to live with, or how they wish to protect their community, then eventually, diversity could work. But people have to decide that on their own, not government.

No, you got it backwards. Culture reflects the race. No way can culture exist first. First there has to be a race and then out of that race comes the culture. It is all determined by genetics. Genes are what determines a race. It took millions of years for the various races to emerge as well as their cultures.

You are right however regarding the segregation of different cultures. Unfortunately, our goverments policies are against that. In fact they actively work and have spent billions of dollars trying to make integration work but it never worked and it never will work no matter how many more billions they spend trying to make it work

People do not get it, do not understand it primarily because of the media. The media works overtime trying to help and promote these failed goverment policies and programs. They have no problem lying and deceiving the American people in their misguided efforts to try and prop up failed government programs.
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
My brothers company moved hq to Ireland to save taxes but operates here in Michigan. They hired 500 people. That’s pretty good for Michigan. Michigan doesn’t care what nationality those 500 are.

Well, they are Indians and Chinese. White men in Michigan are not qualified to do these jobs. So diversity does make us great

Are you suggesting the corporations are lying? Then maybe you should have thought about that before you voted republican.

You're confused bud...in the scenario you describe your brothers company may have benefited but Americans in general did not and capable Americans lost jobs to foreigners.
Is that what you were really trying to illustrate for us....that Americans get fucked while corporations may not?
 
agree with your post number 158 but the big problem in the USA is legal importation of third worlders into the USA Pilot ,

Especially the importation of Muslim refugees. Obama brought in a bunch and dumped them on communities with NO warning, and that didn't want them. Hillary was going to bring in even more as part of a campaign promise and goal. Thankfully, Hilary LOST.

You are quite right. All of our failed efforts to have a sane immigration policy as well as dealing with our largest minority whom we have wasted huge amounts of resources on and continue to waste resources on to the tune of billions of dollars.....all this insanity can be laid on the doorstep of the liberals and their democratic party who are responsible for these colossal failures.
 
15th post
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
My brothers company moved hq to Ireland to save taxes but operates here in Michigan. They hired 500 people. That’s pretty good for Michigan. Michigan doesn’t care what nationality those 500 are.

Well, they are Indians and Chinese. White men in Michigan are not qualified to do these jobs. So diversity does make us great

Are you suggesting the corporations are lying? Then maybe you should have thought about that before you voted republican.

You're confused bud...in the scenario you describe your brothers company may have benefited but Americans in general did not and capable Americans lost jobs to foreigners.
Is that what you were really trying to illustrate for us....that Americans get fucked while corporations may not?
---------------------------------- waah , but there are NO qualified Americans BLoser
 
Which comes first culture or race? Obviously the race creates the culture. You cannot have one without the other.

You really do not understand what you are saying. To solve the issue of bad cultures and there certainly are bad cultures you would have to destroy the race. That is what Hitler tried to do with the Jews. He was convinced the Jews had a bad culture.

The best we can do is to keep those people out of America. Not talking about the Jews though.

Race usually reflects the culture. However people of the same culture can live in peace regardless of race.

Our laws are designed to force people of different races to live together which in most cases, means forcing people of different cultures to live together. That's why it's always been a failure.

If we didn't have these laws, and allowed individuals to decide who they wish to live with, or how they wish to protect their community, then eventually, diversity could work. But people have to decide that on their own, not government.

No, you got it backwards. Culture reflects the race. No way can culture exist first. First there has to be a race and then out of that race comes the culture. It is all determined by genetics. Genes are what determines a race. It took millions of years for the various races to emerge as well as their cultures.

You are right however regarding the segregation of different cultures. Unfortunately, our goverments policies are against that. In fact they actively work and have spent billions of dollars trying to make integration work but it never worked and it never will work no matter how many more billions they spend trying to make it work

People do not get it, do not understand it primarily because of the media. The media works overtime trying to help and promote these failed goverment policies and programs. They have no problem lying and deceiving the American people in their misguided efforts to try and prop up failed government programs.

It's like being against affirmative action. If you dare speak against it, you are labeled a racist by the left.

So now we all live in fear of the truth, and most feel helpless to change it. Instead, people give up their homes, their cities or towns, and move away from undesirables just so they can live in an environment suitable for their specific culture.
 
Which comes first culture or race? Obviously the race creates the culture. You cannot have one without the other.

You really do not understand what you are saying. To solve the issue of bad cultures and there certainly are bad cultures you would have to destroy the race. That is what Hitler tried to do with the Jews. He was convinced the Jews had a bad culture.

The best we can do is to keep those people out of America. Not talking about the Jews though.

Race usually reflects the culture. However people of the same culture can live in peace regardless of race.

Our laws are designed to force people of different races to live together which in most cases, means forcing people of different cultures to live together. That's why it's always been a failure.

If we didn't have these laws, and allowed individuals to decide who they wish to live with, or how they wish to protect their community, then eventually, diversity could work. But people have to decide that on their own, not government.

No, you got it backwards. Culture reflects the race. No way can culture exist first. First there has to be a race and then out of that race comes the culture. It is all determined by genetics. Genes are what determines a race. It took millions of years for the various races to emerge as well as their cultures.

You are right however regarding the segregation of different cultures. Unfortunately, our goverments policies are against that. In fact they actively work and have spent billions of dollars trying to make integration work but it never worked and it never will work no matter how many more billions they spend trying to make it work

People do not get it, do not understand it primarily because of the media. The media works overtime trying to help and promote these failed goverment policies and programs. They have no problem lying and deceiving the American people in their misguided efforts to try and prop up failed government programs.

Politicians have forced the GDP / population first mindset down our throats...we forgot that quality of life, the preservation of American culture, values, history and tradition are what should be paramount for all good, real Americans.
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
My brothers company moved hq to Ireland to save taxes but operates here in Michigan. They hired 500 people. That’s pretty good for Michigan. Michigan doesn’t care what nationality those 500 are.

Well, they are Indians and Chinese. White men in Michigan are not qualified to do these jobs. So diversity does make us great

Are you suggesting the corporations are lying? Then maybe you should have thought about that before you voted republican.

You're confused bud...in the scenario you describe your brothers company may have benefited but Americans in general did not and capable Americans lost jobs to foreigners.
Is that what you were really trying to illustrate for us....that Americans get fucked while corporations may not?
---------------------------------- waah , but there are NO qualified Americans BLoser

haha...that's what they keep telling us....I call BULLSHIT!
 
Back
Top Bottom