Politicians: Diversity is what makes us great!

If diversity programs had not been rooted in unhinged leftist PC. ideology, they would have been tolerable.

Actually if diversity were left up to the people it would have been tolerable.

But what happens is we have government forcing one group of people on another who don't get along. You can't put a lion and a hyena in the same pen without one killing the other.

This is illustrated by the bad policies created by Democrats and HUD. The government moves lowlifes into a great area, and the area gets destroyed. Home sellers and landlords are bound by law not to discriminate against anybody but people that are of the same race. So if you are selling or renting to an undesirable, you have no choice by law.

Now without HUD and Fair Housing laws, diversity would work itself out. People could choose who they could rent or sell to based on the person instead of the color or race.

If you take 3/4 cup of sour, curdled milk, and mix that with 1/4 cup of fresh milk, the only thing you can create is a cup of bad milk. I just wish our government could learn that lesson.
 
If diversity programs had not been rooted in unhinged leftist PC. ideology, they would have been tolerable.
But the problem lies in the fact that diversity never differentiated between illegal and legal immigrants. Instead they lumped both groups under a general 'immigrant' label in order to perpetuate open borders along with a continuing failure to reform our immigration policies.
Unhinged Democrats and the far left they now worship, truly hate America.

I agree...
This shit should have never been made so trivial. We are a nation funded and run by the citizenry....We The People should benefit from anybody migrating here...PERIOD

A new record of 1,000 plus illegals jumped the border in El Paso the other day.
Where's the outrage?

It's like when 30 people get shot in Chicago on a holiday weekend. It happens so often it's not even news any more. The root word in News is "new."

Dude, your not worried about people getting shot/killed, you just worry that the gun got out safely.

And I'll get back to you on that if I can ever figure out WTF that's supposed to mean.
 
the food excuse from white suburbanite leftrads is the most pathetic thing i ever heard in my life
you have to have an iq of 5 to run with that one .

meanwhile on this board the progs make fun of foreigners who cant speak english ...its a second or third language to some.

The real question why do they hate their mexican waiters , waitresses and illegal alien transsexual bartenders?...who read to children in thier spare time
why are they so racist,transphobic and white privileged


636.webp
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.


In guessing that in-breeding in the hills of kentucky and west virginia is a positive in your mind.

That's awfully racist of you isn't it...we all know that Hispanics and Blacks love their incestual rape.
Whoopsie...and you thought you were being clever...hahaha
"Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children."
https://www.d2l.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/all_statistics_20150619.pdf

Ya, it looks like you don't understand you article posted.

Children living without either parent (foster children) are 10 times more likely to be sexually abused than children that live with both biological parents. Children who live with a single parent that has a live-in partner are at the highest risk: they are 20 times more likely to be victims of child sexual abuse than children living with both biological parents.3 • Gender is also a major factor in sexual abuse. Females are five times more likely to be abused than males.30 The age of the male being abused also plays a part. 8% of victims aged 12 to 17 are male. 26% of victims under the age of 12 are male.9 • Age is a significant factor in sexual abuse. While there is risk for children of all ages, children are most vulnerable to abuse between the ages of seven and 13.30The median age for reported abuse is nine years old.31 However, more than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of eight.9 • Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children.3 • The risk for sexual abuse is tripled for children whose parent(s) are not in the labor force.3 • Children in low socioeconomic status households are three times as likely to be identified as a victim of child abuse.3 • Children who live in rural areas are almost two times more likely to be identified as victims of child sexual abuse.
 
If diversity programs had not been rooted in unhinged leftist PC. ideology, they would have been tolerable.

Actually if diversity were left up to the people it would have been tolerable.

But what happens is we have government forcing one group of people on another who don't get along. You can't put a lion and a hyena in the same pen without one killing the other.

This is illustrated by the bad policies created by Democrats and HUD. The government moves lowlifes into a great area, and the area gets destroyed. Home sellers and landlords are bound by law not to discriminate against anybody but people that are of the same race. So if you are selling or renting to an undesirable, you have no choice by law.

Now without HUD and Fair Housing laws, diversity would work itself out. People could choose who they could rent or sell to based on the person instead of the color or race.

If you take 3/4 cup of sour, curdled milk, and mix that with 1/4 cup of fresh milk, the only thing you can create is a cup of bad milk. I just wish our government could learn that lesson.


Sure, like diversity was working out in the south for almost 200 years...
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.


In guessing that in-breeding in the hills of kentucky and west virginia is a positive in your mind.

That's awfully racist of you isn't it...we all know that Hispanics and Blacks love their incestual rape.
Whoopsie...and you thought you were being clever...hahaha
"Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children."
https://www.d2l.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/all_statistics_20150619.pdf

Ya, it looks like you don't understand you article posted.

Children living without either parent (foster children) are 10 times more likely to be sexually abused than children that live with both biological parents. Children who live with a single parent that has a live-in partner are at the highest risk: they are 20 times more likely to be victims of child sexual abuse than children living with both biological parents.3 • Gender is also a major factor in sexual abuse. Females are five times more likely to be abused than males.30 The age of the male being abused also plays a part. 8% of victims aged 12 to 17 are male. 26% of victims under the age of 12 are male.9 • Age is a significant factor in sexual abuse. While there is risk for children of all ages, children are most vulnerable to abuse between the ages of seven and 13.30The median age for reported abuse is nine years old.31 However, more than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of eight.9 • Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children.3 • The risk for sexual abuse is tripled for children whose parent(s) are not in the labor force.3 • Children in low socioeconomic status households are three times as likely to be identified as a victim of child abuse.3 • Children who live in rural areas are almost two times more likely to be identified as victims of child sexual abuse.

So Black and Brown children living in rural areas are even more likely to be abused? That's ******* racist as all hell..you should be ashamed of yourself.
 
If diversity programs had not been rooted in unhinged leftist PC. ideology, they would have been tolerable.
But the problem lies in the fact that diversity never differentiated between illegal and legal immigrants. Instead they lumped both groups under a general 'immigrant' label in order to perpetuate open borders along with a continuing failure to reform our immigration policies.
Unhinged Democrats and the far left they now worship, truly hate America.

I agree...
This shit should have never been made so trivial. We are a nation funded and run by the citizenry....We The People should benefit from anybody migrating here...PERIOD

A new record of 1,000 plus illegals jumped the border in El Paso the other day.
Where's the outrage?

It's like when 30 people get shot in Chicago on a holiday weekend. It happens so often it's not even news any more. The root word in News is "new."

Dude, your not worried about people getting shot/killed, you just worry that the gun got out safely.

And I'll get back to you on that if I can ever figure out WTF that's supposed to mean.


Try to use your brain instead of your ass then.
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.


In guessing that in-breeding in the hills of kentucky and west virginia is a positive in your mind.

That's awfully racist of you isn't it...we all know that Hispanics and Blacks love their incestual rape.
Whoopsie...and you thought you were being clever...hahaha
"Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children."
https://www.d2l.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/all_statistics_20150619.pdf

Ya, it looks like you don't understand you article posted.

Children living without either parent (foster children) are 10 times more likely to be sexually abused than children that live with both biological parents. Children who live with a single parent that has a live-in partner are at the highest risk: they are 20 times more likely to be victims of child sexual abuse than children living with both biological parents.3 • Gender is also a major factor in sexual abuse. Females are five times more likely to be abused than males.30 The age of the male being abused also plays a part. 8% of victims aged 12 to 17 are male. 26% of victims under the age of 12 are male.9 • Age is a significant factor in sexual abuse. While there is risk for children of all ages, children are most vulnerable to abuse between the ages of seven and 13.30The median age for reported abuse is nine years old.31 However, more than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of eight.9 • Race and ethnicity are an important factor in identified sexual abuse. African American children have almost twice the risk of sexual abuse than white children. Children of Hispanic ethnicity have a slightly greater risk than non-Hispanic white children.3 • The risk for sexual abuse is tripled for children whose parent(s) are not in the labor force.3 • Children in low socioeconomic status households are three times as likely to be identified as a victim of child abuse.3 • Children who live in rural areas are almost two times more likely to be identified as victims of child sexual abuse.

So Black and Brown children living in rural areas are even more likely to be abused? That's ******* racist as all hell..you should be ashamed of yourself.


Nope, just all that red state area that supports trump.

Pretty easy to understand.
 
Are you still eating curds and whey all day every day like they used to or some barley gruel, yummy...?

See #13
---------------------------------- assimilation , what for , there is probably more freedom in the zhitholes for those on the fringe of society and the imported third worlder bring that FREEDOM here to the USA .

I am white and born in this nation yet I don't want your culture, it sucks...
you tell em Moony....

smileys-passing-joint.gif
------------------------------------ i think that my point was , hey , why would they assimilate . And that the problem with importing these third worlders HarryD .
i lived 50 years in S.Cal pissmoe....need i say more?....
 
---------------------------------- assimilation , what for , there is probably more freedom in the zhitholes for those on the fringe of society and the imported third worlder bring that FREEDOM here to the USA .

I am white and born in this nation yet I don't want your culture, it sucks...
you tell em Moony....

smileys-passing-joint.gif
------------------------------------ i think that my point was , hey , why would they assimilate . And that the problem with importing these third worlders HarryD .
i lived 50 years in S.Cal pissmoe....need i say more?....
------------------------------ so what , you probably like zhit holes and the builders of zhitholes Harry .
 
and YES , say what ever you like Harry .
 
Do our politicians really mean that when they say it...OR, is there another political motive? We hear all the politicians leading the nations shitholes always making said proclamation..don’t we?
What statistics would indicate that we are better because of “diversity”? Is Los Angeles better / great? Is San Francisco better / great?
Let’s not be myopic here, let’s talk with the overall impact in mind.
It seems to me that anytime “diversification” is deployed the only beneficiaries are those creating the diversity.
Yes, a lack of diversity is what doomed the Nazis. They needed an army group in reserve.
 
No reason for diversity in the USA in my opinion . It simply leads to having to deal with foreign ways and foreign thinking . [see 'ilham omar' and 'talib' and their Imported 'somali' electors ] . And then laws , rules and regulations change to accommodate diversity. Many foreigners for example want to modify American Gun Rights and Freedom of Speech in the USA . I see that as a poor trade just to have a 'somali' killer/murderer ' on the Minnesota police force .

Diversity is not an all exclusive item. It makes a world of difference who composes that element of diversity.

That is the huge mistake that has been made regarding diversity. The liberals have loaded the dice so to speak by convincing so many that all divesity is good. Simply not the case.

If you talk about the French, the Eyeties, the Germans, the Dutch, the Scandanavians, the Russians, and other Europeans and even Asians then diversity is a good thing because they are intelligent, educated groups that help America. We do not need to be bringing in the elements that are low i.q., and or that have membership in the most intolerant religion in the World.

To say it plainly and to say it boldly, we must insist on quality immigrants that have the ability to contribute to America. America is not so huge or rich that we can continue take in millions and millions of immigrants who have nothing to contribute but cheap labor. Nor can we solve all the World's problems by taking those in from countries that have terrible, horrible problems no matter how cruel or un-American liberals may think that is. They are simply wrong about that. America had a long history of allowing in and favoring Europeans until liberals gained enough power and inflluence to institute a radical change in our immigration policy..
 
Last edited:
i think that the 'nazi' had one , i think they were called 'palis' and muslims DPalos .
 
15th post
maybe the muslim palis were to far away to really help the 'nazis' in 'europe' DPalos .
 
Diversity is fine if it happens naturally, and people do what they are best at, and qualified to do. When diversity is forced with issues like Affirmative Action or other non organic methods, it is a DETRIMENT.
 
Assimilation is what makes us great.

All diversity does is muddy the waters.
Are you still eating curds and whey all day every day like they used to or some barley gruel, yummy...?

See #13
---------------------------------- assimilation , what for , there is probably more freedom in the zhitholes for those on the fringe of society and the imported third worlder bring that FREEDOM here to the USA .
------------------------------ Yeah , read my post in full . why would third world imports assimilate no matter if legal or illegal imported third worlders . ....



Because that’s the path to accessing all of the opportunities available in America, and immigrants are more aware of that than anyone.
 
No reason for diversity in the USA in my opinion . It simply leads to having to deal with foreign ways and foreign thinking . [see 'ilham omar' and 'talib' and their Imported 'somali' electors ] . And then laws , rules and regulations change to accommodate diversity. Many foreigners for example want to modify American Gun Rights and Freedom of Speech in the USA . I see that as a poor trade just to have a 'somali' killer/murderer ' on the Minnesota police force .

Diversity is not an all exclusive item. It makes a world of difference who composes that element of diversity.

That is the huge mistake that has been made regarding diversity. The liberals have loaded the dice so to speak by convincing so many that all divesity is good. Simply not the case.

If you talk about the French, the Eyeties, the Germans, the Dutch, the Scandanavians, the Russians, and other Europeans and even Asians then diversity is a good thing because they are intelligent, educated groups that help America. We do not need to be bringing in the elements that are low i.q., and or that have membership in the most intolerant religion in the World.

Forcing diversity on society is like forcing a man and woman who hate each other to marry. In most cases, diversity only makes one party happy at the disadvantage of the other.

That begs the question of why diversity at all? I'd be quite happy living with people of my own race, and happier with people of my own ethnic background. Why is it others need to diversify with us?
 
Back
Top Bottom