Police state national ID card tucked in immigration bill

[badger2]

#300 is incorrect. Montrevant's last question is the clue: the ID machine is faulty at both levels.

 

[badger2]

At the state and federal level, if a photo ID is required, the technology of photography is prioritized before the individual is prioritized, even if they possess a legal American birth certificate, which alone will not suffice. This is a contradiction adjusted as well to immigration questions. If a photo ID cannot be obtained without an address, the address is reified before the individual is reified, even if they possess uncashed Social Security checks made out to them, at which point state-local and federal coalesce the contradiction.

Wisconsin voter ID cannot be obtained if previously having had a driver's license in that state; neither can a non-driver's ID be obtained without an address, which again is a reification of the address over the individual, linking to Eugene, Oregon veterans who, even if having a photo ID of any sort, could not vote without having an address.

When Social Security notices the uncashed checks, are they obligated to tend to this accounting error? If the checks are taken into the local Social Security office, are they obligated to prove or disprove legal possession of the checks? Will the address over-ride the legality of possessing the checks? If it be a question of mail fraud, Social Security has a credibility problem in court, and they may have the burden of proof in identifying the one the checks are made out to. If it proves the address is incorrect, the lack of address is against the law at the local level (by default) and the federal level.

What immigrants?

 

[badger2]

Homeless Man Shot, Killed Was a Vietnam Veteran
www.lasvegasnow.com/news/only-on-8-homeless-man-shot-killed-was-a-vietnam-veteran/953808705