Police dog bites unarmed man

[protectionist]

looks like the media is just trying to stir up a racial divide.

 

[protectionist]

Pigs will be pigs.

Idiots will be idiots.

 

[protectionist]

Interesting though how, when it is a black person, it gets plastered all over the news everywhere and when it is white people, not much is said and most people don't even know about it.

Biden's dog Commander has bitten Secret Service officers 10 times in four months, records show

Secret Service records show that President Joe Biden's dog Commander has bitten or attacked agency officers stationed at the White House 10 times between October 2022 and January.

apnews.com

That is probably the most meaningful post in the thread. Just another left media trying to stir up black victimhood, with hate against the police. Did this reporter mention anything about the good (and dangerous) things cops have been doing, and commending them for that ?

 

[ozro]

None of that applies in this situation. The suspect had surrendered. Period. Yes he had fled in the vechicle. But he was now standing with his hands empty and up.

Empty hands. No weapons. Not fleeing. Not running away. Standing and obeying the instructions of police.

Now you may think the baddie deserves to be bitten. But the inevitable lawsuit he will win says no.

Expect the charges he is facing to be seriously reduced, if not dropped because of the excessive force. Now let me ask you this. If the purpose of police is to get the baddies off the street, whose fault is it when the baddie goes back on the street because the cops couldn’t resist the instant gratification?

Did you happen to notice where I posted about an investigation and holding the handler responsible for misconduct and not the dog?
If you just have an ax to grind you got the wrong person retard.
I'm just in favor of treating to dog properly.
Your post certainly demonstrates the fact that dogs are better people than humans, and much smarter.
No go shake your fist and yell nonsense at the clouds grandpa Simpson.

 

[PeterPilot]

It is incidents like these that give rise to defund the cops sentiments.

 

[beagle9]

None of that applies in this situation. The suspect had surrendered. Period. Yes he had fled in the vechicle. But he was now standing with his hands empty and up.

Empty hands. No weapons. Not fleeing. Not running away. Standing and obeying the instructions of police.

Now you may think the baddie deserves to be bitten. But the inevitable lawsuit he will win says no.

Expect the charges he is facing to be seriously reduced, if not dropped because of the excessive force. Now let me ask you this. If the purpose of police is to get the baddies off the street, whose fault is it when the baddie goes back on the street because the cops couldn’t resist the instant gratification?

Fair post.

 

[Couchpotato]

Why?
How dumb are cops? Don’t they realize they are on video?

These cases repeatedly happen
They are in complete control, the guy isn’t resisting

Still they use excessive force

Stupidity and EGO.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Police mess up and people here stumble over themselves to lick their boots for it.

Hmm, haven’t seen Ray From Cleveland in a while.

 

[beagle9]

Police mess up and people here stumble over themselves to lick their boots for it.

Hmm, haven’t seen Ray From Cleveland in a while.

Yeah, hope Ray is alright... He has cancer I think.. Sad stuff for sure. Glad you mentioned him.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yeah, hope Ray is alright... He has cancer I think.. Sad stuff for sure. Glad you mentioned him.

I always call him a boot-licker because he would ALWAYS defend the police no matter what. It just occurred to me that I haven't seen him around for a while.

I didn't know he has cancer. Doesn't sound good.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Why?
How dumb are cops? Don’t they realize they are on video?

These cases repeatedly happen
They are in complete control, the guy isn’t resisting

Still they use excessive force.

They are so used to being above the law they think they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

And often, they can.

You asshole. The man had his hands up. His officers were telling not to loose the dog!

Some people are natural-born bootlickers. They would cheer the Gestapo herding Jews into boxcars.

This reminds me of the glory days back in the 60s when blacks got out of hand and they'd release the dogs on them. Ah, those were the days!

You're not even a good troll anymore.

Black man attacked by Ohio police dog during traffic stop

A local officer unleashed the dog on the man, who exited his vehicle with his hands raised after a traffic stop, even though a state trooper told the officer not to release the dog.

www.reuters.com

July 23 (Reuters) - Police in Ohio unleashed a canine on a Black man who had exited his vehicle with his hands raised after a traffic stop earlier this month, according to officials.

The incident unfolded on July 4 after law enforcement officers engaged in the lengthy pursuit of a semi-tractor trailer driven by 23-year-old Jadarrius Rose. The vehicle was missing a mud flap and it had failed to stop for an inspection, a report from the Ohio State Highway Patrol (OSHP) said.

It came to a halt on a state highway about 40 miles south of Columbus after authorities deployed tire deflation devices, known as "stop sticks," for a second time.

In a video provided by the highway patrol, Rose is seen standing in front of the vehicle with his hands raised as law enforcement officials order him to get on the ground.

Moments later, an officer with the Circleville Police Department unleashed a police dog on Rose even though a state trooper told the local officer not to release the dog.

"Do not release the dog - with his hands up," the trooper can be heard shouting on the video.

The video shows the dog running towards Rose, now on his knees, and video appears to show the canine biting and pulling the driver. Rose screams loudly and can be heard saying, "please get it off."

"As troopers were attempting to gain compliance by providing verbal commands to the suspect, Circleville Police Department deployed their canine, which resulted in the suspect being bitten by the canine," the highway patrol said in a statement.

Handler should be vivisected.

 

[BS Filter]

This guy was accused of a minor traffic violation and surrendered with his hands up. He was kneeling and the other officers screamed……Don’t release the dog!

Still the guy released him and ordered him to attack

He ran. No sympathy.

 

[Jarlaxle]

No, they were not "his" officers. The dog was with the local police. The state police told him do not release the dog and he did.

This was a total fuckup on the cops part. The dog was not needed. This is all over the trucking forums I'm a member of.

The fact the state troopers did not ARREST the dog handler on the spot is a VERY serious problem.

Police Dogs are there to take down suspects who resist orders by police whether they are armed or not...
Good Boy.... good boy....

You'd cheer guards turning attack dogs on prisoners at Treblinka.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Stupidity and EGO.

No: sadism and evil.

 

[LibertyKid]

Let's not discuss the choices made prior to the theft. This is problem with many of you as you ignore the choice made prior to any altercation with police.
The guy chose to steal
That leads to a confrontation with police
As we have seen, many times, at this point, things can go poorly, intentionally or not.
All I'm pointing out is that personal choices have consequences, but the left loves to disregard all those precursor "choices" that landed the criminal face to face with police.

 

[rightwinger]

All I'm pointing out is that personal choices have consequences, but the left loves to disregard all those precursor "choices" that landed the criminal face to face with police.

The officer who chose to release his dog on a suspect who was surrendering must face the consequences

 

[LibertyKid]

The officer who chose to release his dog on a suspect who was surrendering must face the consequences

Don't disagree. But the left loves to ignore the poor life choices that put them in front of the police. I've never been bit by a police dog, never been shot, tazed, or arrested by police. Why do we think that is? Maybe, if people started acting like rational, productive, law abiding citizens, these incidents would decrease?

 

[SavannahMann]

Let's not discuss the choices made prior to the theft. This is problem with many of you as you ignore the choice made prior to any altercation with police.
The guy chose to steal
That leads to a confrontation with police
As we have seen, many times, at this point, things can go poorly, intentionally or not.
All I'm pointing out is that personal choices have consequences, but the left loves to disregard all those precursor "choices" that landed the criminal face to face with police.

Actually he choose not to stop when the cops tried to do a traffic stop for a mud flap.

However he did eventually stop and exit the vehicle as instructed. He raised his hands in surrender as instructed. Let me see your hands is the usual command.

His previous actions would and in fact did guarantee his arrest and charges of various crimes. Including many felonies. However. His resistance ended when he was standing with his hands up in compliance with instructions.

At that point in time the jobs of the cops just got a lot better. They get to take the guy into custody without anyone getting injured. That means less paperwork. If the guy is surrendering chances are he will talk. And the case against him, already pretty strong, will be even stronger.

The actions of the idiot dog handler just made the half hour pursuit that led up to that moment wasted time for the cops. Further that minute of the dog attacking will cost the city a lot of money. Money they could have used for other things.

You may say Insurance Pays. Yes. If they are insured the insurance pays. And then like all insurance the premiums go up. So even if the city doesn’t pay out of pocket. They’ll pay eventually with higher rates.

Now the case against the baddie is up in smoke. You can’t put those cops on the stand. Because the first thing the Defense will do in cross examination is use that video and ask the officer if his voice is one of those saying don’t release the dog.

The baddie is walking free because of the idiot cop and that attitude you espouse. Think about it. The cops are supposed to get the bad guys off the street. That one idiot cop not only put the bad guy back on the street. That idiot cop made sure the bad guy was walking away with a lot of money. The lesson? Crime pays, if you are fortunate enough to get an idiot cop arresting you.

 

[LibertyKid]

Actually he choose not to stop when the cops tried to do a traffic stop for a mud flap.

However he did eventually stop and exit the vehicle as instructed. He raised his hands in surrender as instructed. Let me see your hands is the usual command.

His previous actions would and in fact did guarantee his arrest and charges of various crimes. Including many felonies. However. His resistance ended when he was standing with his hands up in compliance with instructions.

At that point in time the jobs of the cops just got a lot better. They get to take the guy into custody without anyone getting injured. That means less paperwork. If the guy is surrendering chances are he will talk. And the case against him, already pretty strong, will be even stronger.

The actions of the idiot dog handler just made the half hour pursuit that led up to that moment wasted time for the cops. Further that minute of the dog attacking will cost the city a lot of money. Money they could have used for other things.

You may say Insurance Pays. Yes. If they are insured the insurance pays. And then like all insurance the premiums go up. So even if the city doesn’t pay out of pocket. They’ll pay eventually with higher rates.

Now the case against the baddie is up in smoke. You can’t put those cops on the stand. Because the first thing the Defense will do in cross examination is use that video and ask the officer if his voice is one of those saying don’t release the dog.

The baddie is walking free because of the idiot cop and that attitude you espouse. Think about it. The cops are supposed to get the bad guys off the street. That one idiot cop not only put the bad guy back on the street. That idiot cop made sure the bad guy was walking away with a lot of money. The lesson? Crime pays, if you are fortunate enough to get an idiot cop arresting you.

You're missing my point. I'm not exonerating the police here. My point is that the left and those who are sympathetic to criminals refuse acknowledge all the choices prior to interacting with police and which led to interacting with police. Now, when the interaction occurs, both parties have choices to make. From a statistical standpoint, the hundreds or thousands of traffic stops that occur a day go without incident because both parties make good choices. It's only the ones that become a shit show that get the attention. The ones that involve black criminals get the most attention because, let's be honest here, it's a divisive political tool today.
What the left continues to do is ignore the choices that led to the interaction with officers.

It's the same narrative for other racial issues:
Blacks have lower home ownership rates, therefore we have a system racial issue in this country.
What's not talked about are the poor financial and life choices that results in a denied home loan. You can find countless articles about these types of narratives. But they will never discuss the poor financial habits that led to that outcome.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The police dog's report.