🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory

[TimFitz]

Everyone interefered from everywhere but never as much as your American communist deep state does to other countries you simple minded baboon.

So, you have nothing but made up empty claims.

 

[TimFitz]

And that's why Obama ordered them to not release that information and to go back and find something else out.

And it was never conclusively proven that the Russians were behind either email hack.

That is flagrantly false.

 

[jknowgood]

You sad people have been saying this for years.

They just keep lying to you. These dopes in this administration barely know what they’re doing, apart from pitching you conspiracy stories.

No we knew it all along and now the evidence is finally coming out.

 

[Marener]

No we knew it all along and now the evidence is finally coming out.

There’s no evidence of anything illegal here.

You didn’t “know” anything, you’re just living off a bullshit narrative.

Which is why you’re not actually talking about the evidence. You don’t even know what it is. You’re just told it exists.

 

[TimFitz]

And that's why Obama ordered them to not release that information and to go back and find something else out.

And it was never conclusively proven that the Russians were behind either email hack.

“
In early 2016, the Russian government employed cyber intrusions (hacking) and releases of hacked materials damaging to the Clinton campaign. A division of Russian military intelligence called the GRU carried out these operations.

In March, the GRU began hacking (through malware and “spearphishing” campaigns) the email accounts of Clinton campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta.

In April, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the DemocraticNational Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks.

In June the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas “DCLeaks” and “Guccifer 2.0.” They later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks.”

This as never been challenged or contradicted.

Julian Assange served as a Russian asset in aid of the leaks effort. s cut out was Roger Stone, who was not officially part of the Trump campaign at the time (for plausible deniability purposes).

FSB inscription software was installed on Wikileaks computers.

 

[TimFitz]

You didn't have evidence when John Ratcliffe was DNI in 2020 and it just so happens to come out when MAGA voters want to know where Epstein's list of predators is?

They will recycle variations on this for the remainder of Trump’s rule.

None of the Trumpsters here even notice that this “bombshell” does not contradict one word of the already established record.

 

[22lcidw]

You didn't have evidence when John Ratcliffe was DNI in 2020 and it just so happens to come out when MAGA voters want to know where Epstein's list of predators is?

Everything you do has shills like Colbert championing it.

 

[popscottpopscott]

That’s an accurate statement.

Edgetho
"Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."

"That’s an accurate statement."

Not per the 17 intel community that wrote their report to get the ball a rollin'... they can't even backup anything their report "assesses" as factual or the truth

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

page 1: We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election
yet on
page 13: High confidence does not imply the assessment is fact or certainty: such judgement might be wrong

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There is no question that the Orange Corrupt Guy was a Russian dupe.

 

[jknowgood]

There’s no evidence of anything illegal here.

You didn’t “know” anything, you’re just living off a bullshit narrative.

Which is why you’re not actually talking about the evidence. You don’t even know what it is. You’re just told it exists.

They made up Russian collusion to get the fisa court to give them permission to spy on the Trump campaign. Trying to alter the outcome of an election. Serious crimes.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Take it to trial. Full exposure. Michelle will be the star witness against her husband.

 

[Marener]

They made up Russian collusion to get the fisa court to give them permission to spy on the Trump campaign. Trying to alter the outcome of an election. Serious crimes.

That has nothing to do with this fake “bombshell” from the OP.

 

[Marener]

Edgetho
"Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."

"That’s an accurate statement."

Not per the 17 intel community that wrote their report to get the ball a rollin'... they can't even backup anything their report "assesses" as factual or the truth

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

page 1: We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election
yet on
page 13: High confidence does not imply the assessment is fact or certainty: such judgement might be wrong

Is that the best you can do?

 

[Meister]

Is that the best you can do?

What would it take to be enough for you, Marener??? Hmmmm?

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[Marener]

What would it take to be enough for you, Marener??? Hmmmm?

This was a nit-pick because the intelligent estimate said “high confidence” and the Obama administration acted like it was true.

That’s really pathetic.

Gabbard’s bombshell is pretty much bullshit. As far as I can tell, she’s conflating the idea that Russia hacked election infrastructure to change votes (which the administration never said) and the idea that Russia used internet hacking to influence the election, which is true and we all know it (unless you’re a total hack).

 

[justoffal]

This was a strategic release given how the Epstein files backfired. Am I trolling? No. I am just calling balls and strikes.

Don't oversell and under-deliver, and this wouldn't have been necessary.

Bingo

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

All the treason leads to Obama and we can thank this patriot for exposing that treason.

Now we know why Democrats tried so hard to stop Tulsi Gabbard's nomination.


Watch the video.

 

[Hellbilly]

All the treason leads to Obama and we can thank this patriot for exposing that treason.

Now we know why Democrats tried so hard to stop Tulsi Gabbard's nomination.


Watch the video.

No.

 

[Crepitus]

All the treason leads to Obama and we can thank this patriot for exposing that treason.

Now we know why Democrats tried so hard to stop Tulsi Gabbard's nomination.


Watch the video.

The tRumpling's latest attempt to distract you from the Epstein thing.