🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory

What will happen to Obama if found guilty?

  • Nothing

    Votes: 26 86.7%
  • It depends if Trump pardons him.

    Votes: 4 13.3%

  • Total voters
    30
Not even going to bother reviewing the evidence before your shit on it? Rather closed minded.

I will look at it.

But Trump’s collusion with Russian operatives is very very well documented. nor has Trump or his operatives ever challenged or refuted any of it.

Of course, the obvious question remains.

If the Obama Administration wanted to tank Trump in the 2016 election, why didn’t they let the world know about Trump’s Russia connections and his use of Wikileaks to publicize DNC emails that Assange was being supplied by the Russians.

Paul Manafort (a who worked for the Russians) as campaign manager should have been enough.

Add that to the Trump Organization’s near total dependence on Russian money and loans from banks Moscow laundered it’s money through should have been a major factor.

It appears that a major focus of Trump activity has been to transfer his debts to Arab banks and kingdoms in more recent years.
 
Last edited:
That's a nice thought but they will get away with it, they were just following orders after all..

View attachment 1138339

Ah well, it's not like we didn't know before but it's nice to see the evidence out in the open, now the dems can't deny it anymore, it will make them squirm.. and the Epstein popcorn was getting old, this should be good for some time to come..

:coffee:

View attachment 1138342

Clapper asking for an “assesment” of the suspicions is obviously not the same thing as dictating the expected outcome.
 
He played along with the rest of that corrupt regime.

Meaningless.

Now, explain what Russian intelligence operatives were doing wI Trump campaign officials in the Trump Tower.

Explain why Trump picked Paul Manafort, whose connections to Russian activities Ukraine and his associations with the FSB were well known.
 
Meaningless.

Now, explain what Russian intelligence operatives were doing wI Trump campaign officials in the Trump Tower.

Explain why Trump picked Paul Manafort, whose connections to Russian activities Ukraine and his associations with the FSB were well known.
Are you talking about the Russian lawyer that wanted to lobby the campaign on allowing more Russian babies to be adopted by Americans?

When did you become anti legal immigration?
 
Not even going to bother reviewing the evidence before your shit on it? Rather closed minded.
What did you see in this evidence, that was important? Or shows something done wrong? Investigating Russia's attempted interference???
 
So will this get the mass coverage and will USMB trolls start a gazillion threads on it as is the case with the Epstein so-called 'expose'' ?

There is a lot of noise, but almost no substance to it.

Gabbard is serving her master.

Her x posts on this do NOT reflect the content of the report.

There is a deliberate effort to confuse the gullible and falsely conflate the assessments of Russian efforts to penetrate US voting infrastructure, with its well documented efforts to hack and strategically use emails against Clinton, and their extensive social media and fake news campaigns.

Of course, this report does not contradict or refute one word of the Mueller Report, which remains the record of Russia’s efforts to help Trump and Trump’s direct knowledge and coordination with it.

It is ironic that Gabbard uses X, the home base for Russian disinformation as a platform to launch a noise campaign to try and distract Moscow’s efforts.
 
What did you see in this evidence, that was important? Or shows something done wrong? Investigating Russia's attempted interference???
There was no Russian interference. This was just a lie and the Mueller investigation could find no evidence of collusion.
 
What did you see in this evidence, that was important? Or shows something done wrong? Investigating Russia's attempted interference???
The intelligence community concluded that the Russians did not interfere with the 2016 election. Obama ordered them to go back and and do it again.
 
I will look at it.

But Trump’s collusion with Russian operatives is very very well documented. nor has Trump or his operatives ever challenged or refuted any of it.

Of course, the obvious question remains.

If the Obama Administration wanted to tank Trump in the 2016 election, why didn’t they let the world know about Trump’s Russia connections and his use of Wikileaks to publicize DNC emails that Assange was being supplied by the Russians.

Paul Manafort (a who worked for the Russians) as campaign manager should have been enough.

Add that to the Trump Organization’s near total dependence on Russian money and loans from banks Moscow laundered it’s money through should have been a major factor.

It appears that a major focus of Trump activity has been to transfer his debts to Arab banks and kingdoms in more recent years.


Complete lunacy of course. Incoming regimes always open up communication with foriegn leaders. Low energy Jeb Bush took off on a tour before he got lambasted in debates. Obsma Kerry were in with Iran leke family. Just SHUP for once. Manaford got the J6 Chauvin Trump Flynn kangaroo lawfare treatment. There was no crimes.
 
Obama and his Admin interfered with the 2016 Election but failed. Obama wanted his third term. It actually worked better for him by having Trump win in 2016 because there is no way he gets his third term if Hillary wins. Biden was his puppet all along. Obama got his third term in 2020. It was so good, the American people voted Trump back in.
 
15th post
Only if they continued so as not to trigger a statute of limitations, otherwise they may not be prosecutable. But we still need to know all of what they did.

However, fraud can be alleged and fraud, for purposes of the statute of limitations, only starts when found, so they may not be protected by a statute of limitations of fraud against the United States.
There is no statue of limitations on this, since they are still trying to cover it up. Anyway we can take out of date mistomenors, and turn them into felonies now.
 
I will look at it.

But Trump’s collusion with Russian operatives is very very well documented. nor has Trump or his operatives ever challenged or refuted any of it.

Of course, the obvious question remains.

If the Obama Administration wanted to tank Trump in the 2016 election, why didn’t they let the world know about Trump’s Russia connections and his use of Wikileaks to publicize DNC emails that Assange was being supplied by the Russians.

Paul Manafort (a who worked for the Russians) as campaign manager should have been enough.

Add that to the Trump Organization’s near total dependence on Russian money and loans from banks Moscow laundered it’s money through should have been a major factor.

It appears that a major focus of Trump activity has been to transfer his debts to Arab banks and kingdoms in more recent years.
The Russian collusion was debunked years ago, all of them lied to the fish court committing pergury. Which means jail time.
 
This was a strategic release given how the Epstein files backfired. Am I trolling? No. I am just calling balls and strikes.

Don't oversell and under-deliver, and this wouldn't have been necessary.
I was thinking the same. Distraction?
 
Back
Top Bottom