justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
You want to know why Diddy walked? It's not very hard to figure out.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory
- Thread starter excalibur
- Start date
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 71,003
- 45,318
- 2,615
Frankenstein
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2022
- 13,815
- 9,431
- 2,138
Love to hear your theory, Mine is most likely close to being the same
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
That guy evil as he may be is also as smart as they come. He has footage, proof and the receipts of bad behavior by dozens of prominent figures probably including senators, congressman, ex-presidents, judges and you name it. He's basically the Black version of Jeffrey Epstein only maybe not a CIA asset like Epstein apparently was.
There is no ******* way they were going to convict him of anything serious. I am very sure that the phone was ringing at 3:00 a.m. in the morning from all over the place during his ongoing legal proceedings.
In my opinion his one statement to them was ..
All the information is waiting to be released to the public the moment I get convicted.
They probably looked for a couple of months to see if they could find out where the information might be coming from and when they realized they couldn't.... And that they couldn't stop it from becoming public. They let the boy go, that simple.
Now if I was an insurance company I certainly would not give him a life insurance policy.
Let's make that clear.
You actually think the Obama supporting media would cover this?
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
Yet if it was something negative about Trump all he would need is a blog post on the back of some dirty napkin to consider it a legitimate source.
Isn't SDNY the branch that was found to be hiding Epstein records and an US Atty fired for it?Nothing weird about Epstein’s buddy Donald Trump firing Epstein’s prosecutor.I’m no conspiracy theorist but this just screams it.
Was Comey involved?
You notice media is doing exactly the same things they did to Trump during 45?
And our clowns on the left line up and gleefully scream 'BOHICA' with a smile.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
Yup
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
Yes precisely the same thing.... Only this time the receiving audience is quite a bit smaller because many of them have already seen through it.
They are so disillusioned, after media admitting they have covered up and lied, they still believe everything the media puts out without question.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
As I have said on many occasions before people's beliefs even in things dealing with science like global warming usually fall along the lines of what they prefer to believe and not what they should believe. I find this to be about 95% accurate. I constantly have to double check my own motives for believing whatever it is I read because when I follow my emotions instead of my brain I usually get my head handed to me.... Deservedly so.
The left hates Trump not because he's any different than any of their own heroes but because it means they are not in charge.
Therefore they are willing to believe anything and everything no matter how ridiculous or unfounded because it's what they wish.
Jo
James Howard Kunstler:
Meanwhile, DNI Gabbard went on Maria Bartiromo’s Sunday confab and warned of more info releases coming this week. Sooner or later AG Pam Bondi will have to announce that a case based on that referral is under construction. My guess is that this is exactly what Kash Patel’s FBI has been preoccupied with for months with no leaking — you can imagine severe penalties against that. You might also note that there are no higher crimes under our law than treason, as explicitly spelled out in the DNI report. The DNI also stated flatly on Sunday, “There must be indictments.” If you think DNI Gabbard went forward without consulting some crack constitutional lawyers, you’ll be disappointed.
________________
The Russian meddling and collusion story might have seemed like “a thing” to many in the early January days of 2017 before Mr. Trump’s first inauguration. But when they went after the newly appointed National Security Advisor, General Mike Flynn, for having a conversation with the Russian ambassador, you had had to know that something sketchy was afoot. As this blog asked at the time: why are ambassadors from foreign lands here, if not to speak with our government officials? The story was preposterous but, of course, the news media helped run Gen. Flynn out of office and then led the cheering for the DOJ’s malicious prosecution of him afterward in Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s DC district court.
You also have to wonder if anyone in the news media might be subject to indictment above and beyond the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press. Is there a line between that and acting as an accessory to treason? What did New York Times editor (at the time) Dean Baquet think he was doing, publishing all that patent garbage? Or the producers of CNN and other network news?
The DNI called these activities a “treasonous conspiracy” for a reason. A conspiracy charge that encompasses a skein of persons in a continuous series of crimes extends the statute of limitations to the latest criminal act for all involved. You might also wonder how wide a net the DOJ could cast. Will it include such obvious players as Senator Mark Warner, who schemed to play along on RussiaGate as Vice-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence? Or then-Congressman Adam Schiff on the House Intel Committee when, for years, he pretended to have “proof” of (i.e., lied about) Trump-Russia collusion? Or FBI Director Wray, who hid evidence, might have tampered with evidence, and apparently lied to Congress about many of these connected matters? Or Andrew Weissmann, who virtually ran the phony Mueller Investigation as a RussiaGate cover-up op because Robert Mueller was mentally infirm? Or Lawfare Ninjas Marc Elias, Norm Eisen, and Mary McCord who appear liable for 2020 election hackery and the Jan 6 “insurrection” op (including the House J6 Committee fakery afterward) along with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi? Or former AG William Barr, who sat on the Hunter Biden laptop during Trump Impeachment No. 1, when the device was stuffed with exculpatory evidence withheld from Mr. Trump’s lawyers? Or CIA agent Eric Ciaramella, Lt. Col Alex Vindman, and Intel Inspector General Michael Atkinson, who conspired with Rep. Adam Schiff on the “Ukraine phone call” operation that was the basis of impeachment No. 1? Or DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who botched his investigation (on purpose?) of FISA court criminal irregularities, or Judge James Boasberg who presided over those criminal irregularities and issued many of them? Or Special Counsel John Durham who took years to overlook the salient elements of the RussiaGate coup? Or many other figures involved one way or another. . . McCabe, Stzrok, Page, Pientka, Thibault, Baker, Rice, Yates, Rummler, Halper, Pompeo, Haines, Bruce and Nellie Ohr. . . .
__________________
Finally, consider this: demonizing Vladimir Putin set the stage for the Ukraine War — which was initially kicked off in 2014 under President Obama and his State Department / CIA group led by Victoria Nuland orchestrating the Maidan revolt. The official disclosures now by the DNI should make it clear that Mr. Putin did not deserve the treatment he got for years on end, and that the overall effect of it has been catastrophic for world peace. Half the people in the USA still believing all the manufactured bullshit about Mr. Putin has made it extremely difficult for President Trump to end the war in Ukraine that has killed millions.
Meanwhile, DNI Gabbard went on Maria Bartiromo’s Sunday confab and warned of more info releases coming this week. Sooner or later AG Pam Bondi will have to announce that a case based on that referral is under construction. My guess is that this is exactly what Kash Patel’s FBI has been preoccupied with for months with no leaking — you can imagine severe penalties against that. You might also note that there are no higher crimes under our law than treason, as explicitly spelled out in the DNI report. The DNI also stated flatly on Sunday, “There must be indictments.” If you think DNI Gabbard went forward without consulting some crack constitutional lawyers, you’ll be disappointed.
________________
The Russian meddling and collusion story might have seemed like “a thing” to many in the early January days of 2017 before Mr. Trump’s first inauguration. But when they went after the newly appointed National Security Advisor, General Mike Flynn, for having a conversation with the Russian ambassador, you had had to know that something sketchy was afoot. As this blog asked at the time: why are ambassadors from foreign lands here, if not to speak with our government officials? The story was preposterous but, of course, the news media helped run Gen. Flynn out of office and then led the cheering for the DOJ’s malicious prosecution of him afterward in Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s DC district court.
You also have to wonder if anyone in the news media might be subject to indictment above and beyond the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press. Is there a line between that and acting as an accessory to treason? What did New York Times editor (at the time) Dean Baquet think he was doing, publishing all that patent garbage? Or the producers of CNN and other network news?
The DNI called these activities a “treasonous conspiracy” for a reason. A conspiracy charge that encompasses a skein of persons in a continuous series of crimes extends the statute of limitations to the latest criminal act for all involved. You might also wonder how wide a net the DOJ could cast. Will it include such obvious players as Senator Mark Warner, who schemed to play along on RussiaGate as Vice-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence? Or then-Congressman Adam Schiff on the House Intel Committee when, for years, he pretended to have “proof” of (i.e., lied about) Trump-Russia collusion? Or FBI Director Wray, who hid evidence, might have tampered with evidence, and apparently lied to Congress about many of these connected matters? Or Andrew Weissmann, who virtually ran the phony Mueller Investigation as a RussiaGate cover-up op because Robert Mueller was mentally infirm? Or Lawfare Ninjas Marc Elias, Norm Eisen, and Mary McCord who appear liable for 2020 election hackery and the Jan 6 “insurrection” op (including the House J6 Committee fakery afterward) along with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi? Or former AG William Barr, who sat on the Hunter Biden laptop during Trump Impeachment No. 1, when the device was stuffed with exculpatory evidence withheld from Mr. Trump’s lawyers? Or CIA agent Eric Ciaramella, Lt. Col Alex Vindman, and Intel Inspector General Michael Atkinson, who conspired with Rep. Adam Schiff on the “Ukraine phone call” operation that was the basis of impeachment No. 1? Or DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who botched his investigation (on purpose?) of FISA court criminal irregularities, or Judge James Boasberg who presided over those criminal irregularities and issued many of them? Or Special Counsel John Durham who took years to overlook the salient elements of the RussiaGate coup? Or many other figures involved one way or another. . . McCabe, Stzrok, Page, Pientka, Thibault, Baker, Rice, Yates, Rummler, Halper, Pompeo, Haines, Bruce and Nellie Ohr. . . .
__________________
Finally, consider this: demonizing Vladimir Putin set the stage for the Ukraine War — which was initially kicked off in 2014 under President Obama and his State Department / CIA group led by Victoria Nuland orchestrating the Maidan revolt. The official disclosures now by the DNI should make it clear that Mr. Putin did not deserve the treatment he got for years on end, and that the overall effect of it has been catastrophic for world peace. Half the people in the USA still believing all the manufactured bullshit about Mr. Putin has made it extremely difficult for President Trump to end the war in Ukraine that has killed millions.
Russian asset Gabbard?Think so?
Like her dear leader.
Russian State TV Panel Call Tulsi Gabbard 'Our Girlfriend'
Newsweek
https://www.newsweek.com › tulsi-gabbard-solovyov-r...
Mar 31, 2022 — Former representative and Democratic primary contender Tulsi Gabbard was described in friendly terms by those appearing on a Russian state television show.
Tulsi Gabbard's history with Russia is even more ...
The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk › ... › US politics
Feb 4, 2025 — When Russia invaded Ukraine, Gabbard again defended Russian aggression. “This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden ...
Attachments
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,480
- 31,422
- 2,905
So? Ted Bundy says you gave him great blow jobs.
Is that also credible?
What is breaking is the President of the United States posting an AI video of violence against a former President. I expect Trump's veins to constrict his heart very very soon. From his ankles we are close. Clearly his brain is affected.
