🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory

[Soupnazi630]

Except when it came to Oswald being the lone gunman, but that's for another thread.

They were correct about that as well;

He acted alone and was the only shooter

 

[j-mac]

No, they do not; they work for the United States of America and the Constitution. Trump owns zero percent of the US military.

I really hope someone is keeping track of all of these new rules for being a President…

 

[DonGlock26]

Do you always lick the balls of yer master?

Leave your favorite peccadillo out of this.

 

[Moonglow]

Leave your favorite peccadillo out of this.

I am sure you love 'em when they're hot and wet.

 

[j-mac]

Do you always lick the balls of yer master?

You sure seem to have that on your mind a lot…Is that your go to since you dried up?

 

[DonGlock26]

No, they do not; they work for the United States of America and the Constitution. Trump owns zero percent of the US military.

"The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."

Article II

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[WEATHER53]

Starting to shuffle this 35 page thread around to get the spotlight off of it.
But not censoring by any means

 

[DonGlock26]

I am sure you love 'em when they're hot and wet.

 

[Oswald Was Innocent]

No, they do not; they work for the United States of America and the Constitution. Trump owns zero percent of the US military.

Then how did Trump make them have a parade on his birthday and the Army's 250th anniversary?

 

[Moonglow]

Indeed, you be, Chauvinist.

 

[irosie91]

Then how did Trump make them have a parade on his birthday and the Army's 250th anniversary?

the President is the commander in chief of the military

 

[Moonglow]

Then how did Trump make them have a parade on his birthday and the Army's 250th anniversary?

It was the army's birthday...

 

[BackAgain]

Leave your favorite peccadillo out of this.

Of course he does.

He’s a scurvy ridden little libtardo.

But, on topic? He often refrains from such things.

ON TOPIC: the revelations made more clear by DNI Gabbard are pretty startling. A criminal prosecution of the prime offenders might prove difficult merely because of all the classified material involved (and the heavy need for redactions) and because of the alphabet soup of abbreviations in such intelligence documents.

Plus, many (if not most of the) Democrat-aligned voters, who could be empaneled on a trial jury, would be reluctant to do justice when that might hurt their Party.

 

[Moonglow]

The Commander-in-Chief doesn't own the military, he directs it...

 

[Moonglow]

Of course he does.

He’s a scurvy ridden little libtardo.

But, on topic? He often refrains from such things.

ON TOPIC: the revelations made more clear by DNI Gabbard are pretty startling. A criminal prosecution of the prime offenders might prove difficult merely because of all the classified material involved (and the heavy need for redactions) and because of the alphabet soup of abbreviations in such intelligence documents.

Plus, many (if not most of the) Democrat-aligned voters, who could be empaneled on a trial jury, would be reluctant to do justice when that might hurt their Party.

Trump made sure the Supreme Court covered the immunity of the president. But what the echo chamber does with its sheep like you is run you off another path to cover for Trump and Epstein with a story that is not going to get rid of Epstein for Trump...No matter what happens, nothing will happen to Oblama.

 

[BackAgain]

The Commander-in-Chief doesn't own the military, he directs it...

No shit, Goonie.

 

[Moonglow]

No shit, Goonie.

I see you finally recognize yer master's limitations.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump made sure the Supreme Court covered the immunity of the president. But what the echo chamber does with its sheep like you is run you off another path to cover for Trump and Epstein with a story that is not going to get rid of Epstein for Trump...No matter what happens, nothing will happen to Oblama.

Goonblow:

Face reality. You’re one of the sheep. You’d go down on ex-President Potato McAlzheimer if you felt it might benefit the present libturd effort to deflect.

And you don’t know a damn thing about my position on this “Epstein” issue. Your speculation of — not surprisingly — way off the mark.

If stupidity was more painful, you’d writhe in agony for the rest of your life.

 

[BackAgain]

I see you finally recognize yer master's limitations.

You don’t see anything.

Telling us all that a President doesn’t own the military isn’t informative since it’s common knowledge. But you seem to imagine it needed to be said, anyway you’re a douchebag, Goonie.

Now, try to get yourself ON topic or maybe you could just STFU.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Of course he does.

He’s a scurvy ridden little libtardo.

But, on topic? He often refrains from such things.

ON TOPIC: the revelations made more clear by DNI Gabbard are pretty startling. A criminal prosecution of the prime offenders might prove difficult merely because of all the classified material involved (and the heavy need for redactions) and because of the alphabet soup of abbreviations in such intelligence documents.

Plus, many (if not most of the) Democrat-aligned voters, who could be empaneled on a trial jury, would be reluctant to do justice when that might hurt their Party.

I'm thinking the President can declassify it all, and the case be tried in FLA.