Pocahontas (Goofy Elizabeth Warren): "i will be WATCHDOG of Crooked Hillary's administration"

One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

A video was to blame in the Benghazi deaths. Now, find one to match, maestro.............
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

Ahem the left burning Bush in effigy, mature? You people have no room to talk, you're just upset a Republican has the balls to give you a dose of your own medicine, suck it!
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
War+is+peace.jpg
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

Ahem the left burning Bush in effigy, mature? You people have no room to talk, you're just upset a Republican has the balls to give you a dose of your own medicine, suck it!
Lol, so someone who started a war under false pretenses which has tremendous negative effects on the world even today deserves praise and btw the left used arguments not derogative statements.
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

A video was to blame in the Benghazi deaths. Now, find one to match, maestro.............
Give me links please I can't comment on your statements if I don't know what the actual lie is. I probably should have specified, confirmed, not perceived lies. Not that I claim you won't be able to find Clinton lying of course. I'm just claiming Trump does it way more frequently.
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

A video was to blame in the Benghazi deaths. Now, find one to match, maestro.............
Give me links please I can't comment on your statements if I don't know what the actual lie is. I probably should have specified, confirmed, not perceived lies. Not that I claim you won't be able to find Clinton lying of course. I'm just claiming Trump does it way more frequently.

Google it! It's not my responsibility to 'spell it out for you' since you've been living under a rock!
 
CNN bringing the "big guns" like Pocohantis who were humiliated months ago is still not going help people forget Crooked Hillary got PWND by The Donald at the Commander in Chief "debate."
 
One habitual liar vows to keep an eye on another habitual liar, does that make sense even in the twisted fucked up world of liberals?
Calling someone a liar when the candidate on the republican ticket is Trump, shows a level of hypocrisy that defies belief.

Trump doesn't hold a candle to the 30+ years of 'public service' ly'in by the Hill-Beast. Mainly cause Trump wasn't in 'public service' that long. Facts and logic escape 'ye..............
I'll tell you what, you point out a Hilary lie and I'll find one of Trump to match. Oh and just so you know now anytime someone uses derogatory terms like Hildabeast or fauxahontas or a million other terms I've seen people describe their rivals, to me doesn't make somebody's point stronger, quite the opposite, to me it signals a lack of actual well conceived arguments and immaturity and that includes the republican candidate, who started most of those terms.

A video was to blame in the Benghazi deaths. Now, find one to match, maestro.............
Never mind I found it myself. First of Benghazi was at most the OBAMA administration moving to slowly and underestimating what was going on. So framing it as a Clinton lie when you can't place her as saying anything is at the very least bizarre. Secondly, besides spending millions on the investigation the republican senate hasn't turned up anything to prosecute. So that lie falls flat to begin with. Lets start with Trump. He claims he opposed the war in Iraq while this is the actual story.

Trump has a hard time getting past a September 2002 interview with shock jock Howard Stern. Stern asked Trump if he supported the looming invasion.

Trump responded, "Yeah, I guess so."

Trump dialed that back a bit in another interview in January 2003, a few months before the invasion. Fox News’ Neil Cavuto asked Trump whether President George W. Bush should be more focused on Iraq or the economy.

"Well, he has either got to do something or not do something, perhaps, because perhaps shouldn't be doing it yet and perhaps we should be waiting for the United Nations, you know," Trump said. "He's under a lot of pressure. I think he's doing a very good job. But, of course, if you look at the polls, a lot of people are getting a little tired. I think the Iraqi situation is a problem. And I think the economy is a much bigger problem as far as the president is concerned."

So Trump put the economy ahead of confronting Iraq, but he didn’t speak against going to war. At most he suggested waiting for the United Nations to do something.

A week after the United States invaded Iraq on March 19, 2003, Trump gave different takes. At an Academy Awards after-party, Trump said that "the war’s a mess," according to the Washington Post. He told Fox News that because of the war, "The market’s going to go up like a rocket."

The earliest evidence of Trump’s outright opposition to the war came in that August 2004 article in Esquire:
 

Forum List

Back
Top