Please explain to me why the ballroom has so many panties in a bunch.....

The only reason that would happen is because the Negative Nancy Nay-sayers would tie up any attempt to improve the grounds because they can't allow themselves to see it be successfully used and make the nation look good. Also, they're 95% certain that the next president who would even consider tearing it down would rather use it instead, so they can't allow it to be completed.
With good reason after seeing what he has done to the oval office and the rose garden.
 
The anticipated cost has already surged from $200 million to $400 million;
WTF do you care? No taxpayer $$$ are being used.
On Tuesday, the Washington Post released an update regarding the project, and the general conclusion is that there appears to be a lack of clarity surrounding the situation.
The WP is not in the loop. It isn't covered by the FOIA. Yawn. Next.
 
We been over this yesterday. Pull your head out of your ******* ass

PAY TO PLAY you mother ****** slither back into the dirty hole you call home.

And **** you :)

Report it *****, you always do :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
Yup, and just like you were informed yesterday--you pay to play every time you send in your taxes. Now try again as soon as you get past being triggered and learn proper English, moron.
 
The national historic society? Really? The East wing was not particularly historical. Now they want to dictate the architecture and take it back to Congress for approval or disapproval..... Objecting to the demolition of the east Wing is now moot and yet somehow or another they are wasting their time filing papers objecting to the demolition.

A little research produces the information that the East Wing was expanded in 1902 to house the first lady's staff. It was expanded further in the 1940s to cover up the presidential emergency operations center. So f****** what?

You want to tell me that the first lady staff now has no place to operate from? Hell, Trump hardly ever stays at the White House anyway..... I guess the last time he hosted a large international event with temporary tents and literally with porta potties.... It must have it must have dawned on him that the United States needed some type of formal reception area for international affairs. I can't see the president of France unbuttoning his sports jacket to step into a blue poop house in front of 300 international guests can you?

What is all the uproar really about? Naked politics I think..... I still haven't seen any reasonable statements by any organizations or individuals explaining why the historicity of the White House has now been damaged....

What I do see is yet another attempt to stop Trump from being as successful as he has been. Add to this the fact that it's all privately funded, basically excluding the bitching about money and you have an end around around the assholes who object to anything and everything attached to this presidency....just because.

Jo
Because Trump didn't follow any of the rules and regulations he should have followed.

It's not his job to change the White House, it's NOT HIS HOUSE.
 
take that back, **** face, it was Paleman that peddled it.

Eat shit *****


Ukraine: Devon Archer joined the Burisma board of directors in spring of 2014 and was joined by Hunter Biden shortly thereafter. Hunter Biden joined the company as counsel, but after a meeting with Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky in Lake Como, Italy, was elevated to the board of directors in the spring of 2014. Both Biden and Archer were each paid $1 million per year for their positions on the board of directors. In December 2015, after a Burisma board of directors meeting, Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden “called D.C.” in the wake of mounting pressures the company was facing. Zlochevsky was later charged with bribing Ukrainian officials with $6 million in an attempt to delay or drop the investigation into his company. The total amount from Ukraine to the Biden family and their associates is $6.5 million
The Comer investigation fell colossally flat.

Their only “evidence” was the testimony of Tony Bubolinski, which was wild and erratic. No evidence was ever presented to support the empty allegation.

But it is the kind of thing that sells with the Trump cult.
 
WTF do you care? No taxpayer $$$ are being used.

The WP is not in the loop. It isn't covered by the FOIA. Yawn. Next.
There are no plans. The project is in the usual Trump chaos mode.

And only Trump fools actually believe private donors will fund it.

Perhaps Ypu can tell us who is paying the bills right now (or not paying them).
 
15th post
It isn’t a matter of hating Trump.

It’s a matter of seeing one of the symbols of our nation defaced.
.

Wrong.

The White House still looks like this:

1766926284154.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom