Please explain to me why the ballroom has so many panties in a bunch.....

[TimFitz]

And yet when people think of the White House only the Executive Mansion comes to mind, because that is the historical part of the building.

You don't see the wings on the symbol for the White House.

And when you lookup the Capitol Building, the symbol is the Rotunda.

This is one pathetic and absolutely dishonest excuse for your fuhrer’s act of cultural vandalism.

 

[TimFitz]

It's reality.

Something the left has given up on.

It obviously is a very dishonest misrepresentation.

Never accuse anyone of ignoring reality. Trump world never was interested in reality.

 

[martybegan]

And when you lookup the Capitol Building, the symbol is the Rotunda.

This is one pathetic and absolutely dishonest excuse for your fuhrer’s act of cultural vandalism.

LOL "vandalism"

Until this all happened you probably couldn't even picture what the East wing looked like.

 

[martybegan]

It obviously is a very dishonest misrepresentation.

Never accuse anyone of ignoring reality. Trump world never was interested in reality.

Says a person who thinks women can have penises.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So this monstrosity is your idea of an iconic masterpiece.
View attachment 1198128

.

It's disgusting.

.

 

[Roshambo]

Did you lose your mind when 10% for the big guy was exposed?

I most certainly did. Let me remind you that I voted for Trump.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

He preemptively tore down part of our national heritage. There's a process for these things. It also follows his desecration of the Rose Garden and turning the oval office into some fake French boudoir. Then there's the fact that I'm pretty sure it's gonna remain a smoking hole in the ground for the next three years minimum.

Nope. The ballroom will be built and you will lose yet again.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Nope. The ballroom will be built and you will lose yet again.

.

They can't stop what is coming.

.

 

[hadit]

The national historic society? Really? The East wing was not particularly historical. Now they want to dictate the architecture and take it back to Congress for approval or disapproval..... Objecting to the demolition of the east Wing is now moot and yet somehow or another they are wasting their time filing papers objecting to the demolition.

A little research produces the information that the East Wing was expanded in 1902 to house the first lady's staff. It was expanded further in the 1940s to cover up the presidential emergency operations center. So f****** what?

You want to tell me that the first lady staff now has no place to operate from? Hell, Trump hardly ever stays at the White House anyway..... I guess the last time he hosted a large international event with temporary tents and literally with porta potties.... It must have it must have dawned on him that the United States needed some type of formal reception area for international affairs. I can't see the president of France unbuttoning his sports jacket to step into a blue poop house in front of 300 international guests can you?

What is all the uproar really about? Naked politics I think..... I still haven't seen any reasonable statements by any organizations or individuals explaining why the historicity of the White House has now been damaged....

What I do see is yet another attempt to stop Trump from being as successful as he has been. Add to this the fact that it's all privately funded, basically excluding the bitching about money and you have an end around around the assholes who object to anything and everything attached to this presidency....just because.

Jo

I really believe that they simply cannot stand the thought of watching a big State event with happy foreign dignitaries being hosted in style and knowing the TRUMP! made it happen. That's because end-stage TDS. Orange Man Bad trumps everything.

 

[hadit]

He preemptively tore down part of our national heritage. There's a process for these things. It also follows his desecration of the Rose Garden and turning the oval office into some fake French boudoir. Then there's the fact that I'm pretty sure it's gonna remain a smoking hole in the ground for the next three years minimum.

The only reason that would happen is because the Negative Nancy Nay-sayers would tie up any attempt to improve the grounds because they can't allow themselves to see it be successfully used and make the nation look good. Also, they're 95% certain that the next president who would even consider tearing it down would rather use it instead, so they can't allow it to be completed.

 

[TimFitz]

LOL "vandalism"

Until this all happened you probably couldn't even picture what the East wing looked like.

I can picture it clearly.

 

[TimFitz]

I most certainly did. Let me remind you that I voted for Trump.

It was a lie, so you should have kept your head.

 

[TimFitz]

Says a person who thinks women can have penises.

What?

 

[Roshambo]

.

They can't stop what is coming.

.

Quiet, piggy
Trump is stopping it as it is evident that there is no clear understanding of what the final outcome will be, its size, or its layout. Trump continues to alter plans, motivated by a short-sighted impulsiveness that compels him to broaden the project's scope. Originally, the design was intended to accommodate 650 individuals within 90,000 square feet, yet he has repeatedly expressed dissatisfaction, demanding a larger structure. Earlier this month, he even dismissed the initial architect, and it is likely that this will occur again.The anticipated cost has already surged from $200 million to $400 million; however, these figures hold little significance as they do not align with any concrete plans that would allow for an accurate estimate. On Tuesday, the Washington Post released an update regarding the project, and the general conclusion is that there appears to be a lack of clarity surrounding the situation. There is no finalized design, nor are there specific details regarding the location. Furthermore, there is no consensus on whether the venue will accommodate 650, 1,000, or more attendees, as these particulars seem to fluctuate with Trump's whims.

 

[Roshambo]

It was a lie, so you should have kept your head.

What was a lie, explain.

 

[TimFitz]

Nope. The ballroom will be built and you will lose yet again.

And then it will be demolished.

 

[TimFitz]

What was a lie, explain.

You peddled that false allegation about Biden getting 10%. That was a lie.

 

[Roshambo]

You peddled that false allegation about Biden getting 10%. That was a lie.

take that back, **** face, it was Paleman that peddled it.

Eat shit *****

The Bidens’ Influence Peddling Timeline - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

Ukraine: Devon Archer joined the Burisma board of directors in spring of 2014 and was joined by Hunter Biden shortly thereafter. Hunter Biden joined the company as counsel, but after a meeting with Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky in Lake Como, Italy, was elevated to the board of directors in the spring of 2014. Both Biden and Archer were each paid $1 million per year for their positions on the board of directors. In December 2015, after a Burisma board of directors meeting, Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden “called D.C.” in the wake of mounting pressures the company was facing. Zlochevsky was later charged with bribing Ukrainian officials with $6 million in an attempt to delay or drop the investigation into his company. The total amount from Ukraine to the Biden family and their associates is $6.5 million

Did you lose your mind when 10% for the big guy was exposed?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

And then it will be demolished.

No it won’t. You lose again.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

And then it will be demolished.

.

Terrorist threats?







.