You failed to be the only Alarmist that could reveal the data behind their perceived dilemma.Hilarious
It’s notable that you don’t argue the science because it’s not on your side, so you argue doubt and politics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You failed to be the only Alarmist that could reveal the data behind their perceived dilemma.Hilarious
It’s notable that you don’t argue the science because it’s not on your side, so you argue doubt and politics.
........Serious question. If you are, please tell me what the temperature, co2 ppm, sea level height etc.. has to be for mankind to go extinct? Please don't forget those figures that the dinosaurs flourished under when answering. I cannot for the life of me find an expert Alarmist that can answer this.......What is your question about the science?
I just see a desperate attempt from an internet poster.
Boy, I'm glad there isn't anyone saying that right now. That would be bad.We ask the same about why burn more fossil fuels.
But deniers want no trees.
That we have trees at all at this point indicates that they don't all go up in smoke.Just look at the number and size of forest wildfires burning now around the world. Why add more fuel that will just go up in smoke.
![]()
Extreme wildfires are on the rise globally, powered by the climate crisis
An analysis of 88 million wildfire observations over the past 21 years shows a strong increase in the frequency and intensity of the most extreme fires around the world.theconversation.com
From a scientific perspective, what is it about weather that causes you to shit your pants?What is your question about the science?
What is your question about the science?
We’re discussing climate not weather.
Download this document and read section 7.5 that deals with estimating ECS and TCRWhat is the mathematical relationship between carbon dioxide concentrations and the emissivity parameter in Stefan-Boltzmann greybody equation used by climatology? ... I'd like to know the calculated temperature for all these extra greenhouse gases humans are producing ... i.e. how much does CO2 warm the planet? ...
Or more broadly ... how are you determining climate sensitivity? ...
Nothing wrong with the policy or principles .Just look at the number and size of forest wildfires burning now around the world. Why add more fuel that will just go up in smoke.
I have already suggested some 'geoengineering' ideas. The only conspiracy is the conspiracy to do little or nothing about any of our pressing problems.Nothing wrong with the policy or principles .
Perhaps you should examine more closely the hidden use of weather geo -engineering and not automartically assume that is conspiracy as Sheeple have been entrained to think .
imho .
It's because you are confusing weather for climate that you shit your pants every summer. The scientific term for what you have is Thermophobia.We’re discussing climate not weather.
It's because you are confusing weather for climate that you shit your pants every summer. The scientific term for what you have is Thermophobia.
Gross.Fecesphilia ...
Gross.
Not one that eats shit.Never owned a dog? ...
I've noticed you've stopped asking how ECS and TCR are calculated. Does that mean you looked at the linked document?Download this document and read section 7.5 that deals with estimating ECS and TCR