Plan to ban automatic deduction of public employee union dues clears House panel

[Papageorgio]

Translation for everyone's: Daniel has been beaten solidly and he no longer wants to talk about anything because he is crying about being beaten so soundly. He is going to deflect, because it hurts him so much.

nothing but diversion while proclaiming to to have a "gospel Truth" Cause, Person on the Right?

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Or, is the Party of Nothing but Repeal (or diversion), going to be infidel, protestant, and renegade to that ideology as well?

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

The Drug War has nothing to do with this thread, start another one, you are off topic.

it has this to do with the topic:
I say talk is pretty cheap for the Right; let's discuss this after we end the Drug War.

 

[danielpalos]

I say talk is pretty cheap for the Right; let's discuss this after we end the Drug War.

Translation for everyone's: Daniel has been beaten solidly and he no longer wants to talk about anything because he is crying about being beaten so soundly. He is going to deflect, because it hurts him so much.

nothing but diversion while proclaiming to to have a "gospel Truth" Cause, Person on the Right?

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Or, is the Party of Nothing but Repeal (or diversion), going to be infidel, protestant, and renegade to that ideology as well?

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

 

[danielpalos]

The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation offers free legal representation to workers whose unions refuse to let them resign and become partial-dues, financial-core represented workers. It can be reached on the Internet at National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation An amendment to the NLRA currently under consideration in Congress would extend right-to-work protections to workers in every state. If that were to become law there could be no compulsory union dues for any purpose in any state.

You are forced by unions, to work for the unions.

Andy, who forces a person to apply for a union job? Who keeps a person working a union job who wants to quit that job? No one is the correct answer.

You don't want to work for a union shop, don't apply there. But what I hear is that some workers don't mind working in a union job for the pay and protections. They just happen to be mooches who don't want to pay for the benefits extended to them by the union.

But NO ONE is forced to apply and work for a union shop. NO ONE. And NO ONE is stopped from quitting a union job. NO ONE.

So what is the problem with unions. They are duly elected organizations. Legal. And serve a good purpose for many workers. What is the problem with unions?

And why are the Republican so intent on union busting. What threat does a union represent to Republicans?

I didn't apply for a "union job". The union came in about 3 years later!

They are completely and utterly useless in all respects.

Yet, those on the Right claim you can quit and find a new employer who isn't unionized; instead of merely complaining about that "professional" challenge.

Got it wrong, the only ones on this thread that said you can get another job that wasnt unionized was a lefty.

You need to get your facts straight, you spread a lot of misinformation.

What disinformation, Person on the disingenuous Right when it comes to your clues and your Causes; it is the Right that always claims a Person can quit and find another job.

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but diversion while proclaiming to to have a "gospel Truth" Cause, Person on the Right?

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Or, is the Party of Nothing but Repeal (or diversion), going to be infidel, protestant, and renegade to that ideology as well?

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

The Drug War has nothing to do with this thread, start another one, you are off topic.

it has this to do with the topic:
I say talk is pretty cheap for the Right; let's discuss this after we end the Drug War.

no problem with that due to a lack of clue and Cause; so no problem with union dues being deducted either; i got i.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Translation for everyone's: Daniel has been beaten solidly and he no longer wants to talk about anything because he is crying about being beaten so soundly. He is going to deflect, because it hurts him so much.

nothing but diversion while proclaiming to to have a "gospel Truth" Cause, Person on the Right?

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Or, is the Party of Nothing but Repeal (or diversion), going to be infidel, protestant, and renegade to that ideology as well?

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

 

[kaz]

According to Republicans, it's NOT OK for an auto deduction which costs nothing, but IT IS OK to use your cell phone to pay, and PAY A FEE.

I LOVE IT.....screw workers and suck your contributors all at once! YOU GO REPUBLICANS!!!!!!

Plan to ban automatic deduction of public employee union dues clears House panel News The Advocate Baton Rouge Louisiana

You work hard at being offended, don't you?

 

[kaz]

I think it's a good idea to not force the taxpayers to subsidize the DNC through forced dues of public school teachers to the NEA.

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Separate issues. Neither a qualifies the other. Deal with them separately. Start with removing the DNC wage garnishments.

It is relevant to the extent Other Peoples' monies are being used without their voluntary signatures.

That's my point.

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Was that supposed to make sense?

 

[kaz]

Why is it ok for Firms to use funds to lobby elected representatives, that may impact the bottom line of employees and stockholders?

Why shouldn't they have the same right as Unions?

Isn't that the point of the wealthiest to deny and disparage only the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism?

You don't know what capitalism means

 

[kaz]

I think it's a good idea to not force the taxpayers to subsidize the DNC through forced dues of public school teachers to the NEA.

But it IS OK to SCREW WORKERS?

Democrats are solving that problem, fewer workers to screw

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but diversion while proclaiming to to have a "gospel Truth" Cause, Person on the Right?

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Or, is the Party of Nothing but Repeal (or diversion), going to be infidel, protestant, and renegade to that ideology as well?

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.

 

[danielpalos]

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Separate issues. Neither a qualifies the other. Deal with them separately. Start with removing the DNC wage garnishments.

It is relevant to the extent Other Peoples' monies are being used without their voluntary signatures.

That's my point.

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Was that supposed to make sense?

only if you have a clue or a Cause.

 

[danielpalos]

Why is it ok for Firms to use funds to lobby elected representatives, that may impact the bottom line of employees and stockholders?

Why shouldn't they have the same right as Unions?

Isn't that the point of the wealthiest to deny and disparage only the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism?

You don't know what capitalism means

i know it more that you do; i already read the memo from the left to merely Use capitalism for all of its worth.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Translation for everyone: Daniel blames the right for everything. Daniel claims to be the man of a thousand words and yet can say nothing.

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.

i already smoked two joints

No kidding.

 

[danielpalos]

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.

i already smoked two joints

No kidding.

no kidding, i am not that incredible; unlike the Right even without the use of Drugs to blame it on instead of Individual Responsibility.

 

[kaz]

Separate issues. Neither a qualifies the other. Deal with them separately. Start with removing the DNC wage garnishments.

It is relevant to the extent Other Peoples' monies are being used without their voluntary signatures.

That's my point.

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Was that supposed to make sense?

only if you have a clue or a Cause.

Thanks for clarifying, eh?

 

[bgr39]

[

not at all; Only the Right can't tell the difference but Only when it involves only the least wealthy.

If you are really a Conservative then you don't want taxpayer's money being transferred to anybody that earn it. No welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements.

If somebody "on the Right" tells you they are for any kind any kind of welfare, bailout, subsidy or entitlement then they are deceiving you and they are nothing more than a sorry ass Libtard, like you.

The Left loves their welfare, subsidies, bailouts and entitlements. Especially crony capitalism.

It isn't the fault of the left, the right doesn't know capitalism doesn't work very well, without the Socialism of States and Statism; it is why the social Power to Provide for the general Welfare is in writing in our supreme law of the land; due to that lack of Faith by the Right.

Let me get this straight, you are against the government giving corporate welfare, yet you are for government giving corporate welfare.

I think all corporate welfare should end. You should depend on government to provide your living.

There is a huge difference between "allowing people to keep more of their own money" (tax breaks), and "giving someone's money to someone else" (welfare).

 

[bgr39]

Let's end the Drug War, first.

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.

i already smoked two joints

No kidding.

I wonder IF you know why it is called "DOPE"! (HINT:because of the people that smoke it)

 

[danielpalos]

It is relevant to the extent Other Peoples' monies are being used without their voluntary signatures.

That's my point.

But, it is ok to subsidize corporate management for spending on lobbying from proceeds with tax breaks or simply not really caring about the employees or stockholders?

Was that supposed to make sense?

only if you have a clue or a Cause.

Thanks for clarifying, eh?

i am on the left; we love to help out with our clues and our Causes.

 

[danielpalos]

[

not at all; Only the Right can't tell the difference but Only when it involves only the least wealthy.

If you are really a Conservative then you don't want taxpayer's money being transferred to anybody that earn it. No welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements.

If somebody "on the Right" tells you they are for any kind any kind of welfare, bailout, subsidy or entitlement then they are deceiving you and they are nothing more than a sorry ass Libtard, like you.

The Left loves their welfare, subsidies, bailouts and entitlements. Especially crony capitalism.

It isn't the fault of the left, the right doesn't know capitalism doesn't work very well, without the Socialism of States and Statism; it is why the social Power to Provide for the general Welfare is in writing in our supreme law of the land; due to that lack of Faith by the Right.

Let me get this straight, you are against the government giving corporate welfare, yet you are for government giving corporate welfare.

I think all corporate welfare should end. You should depend on government to provide your living.

There is a huge difference between "allowing people to keep more of their own money" (tax breaks), and "giving someone's money to someone else" (welfare).

not if it impedes infrastructure development that provides for the general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

Dude, we get it, you're a druggie.
That certainly explains your incoherence.

dude, It only explains that the Right has no solutions but Only repeal--even without drugs being involved. It may be no wonder why some on the left want to create open interest in morals testing companies on a for-profit basis.

Shit, it's not even noon. Put down the doobie.

dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.

i already smoked two joints

No kidding.

I wonder IF you know why it is called "DOPE"! (HINT:because of the people that smoke it)

you are confusing being a dope and knowing it; and merely being a hypocrite with no solutions to prove it; dude, it is past 8am, start coming up with better solutions at lower cost; i already smoked two joints and still have fewer fallacies. i don't let my practices interfere with my reasoning, even without any morals test.