Peter Navarro Gets Testy When Asked If Kamala Harris Can Throw Out Election Results

[Lakhota]

"No, no, no, no, no, no!" the former Trump aide reacted to the questions posed by MSNBC's Ari Melber.

Former White House trade adviser Peter Navarro apparently thinks it would have been OK for then-Vice President Mike Pence to challenge the 2020 election results , but not for current Vice President Kamala Harris to do the same in 2024.

After claiming that Pence has the ability to throw votes that might be “suspicious” back to the states, Navarro got into a bit of a tizzy when MSNBC’s Ari Melber asked him on Thursday: “It would follow, from your contention, that Vice President Harris should ultimately have the call over who should be president, regardless of the results in the next election?”

Navarro, who was subpoenaed on Wednesday by the House Jan. 6 committee, objected to Melber’s question.

“It’s not for the vice president to determine who wins. The only thing Pence had the authority to do was go back to the states and let the states look at the votes,” he said.

Of course, Navarro ignored the most basic point of his plan: The votes can’t go back to the states unless a vice president like Pence or Harris goes along with the scam.

Peter Navarro Gets Testy When Asked If Kamala Harris Can Throw Out Election Results

"No, no, no, no, no, no!" the former Trump aide reacted to the questions posed by MSNBC's Ari Melber.

www.huffpost.com

Peter Navarro sounds like a loose canon. What do you think?

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Because you know the are going to if she goes really sideways for the Dems.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course Kamala can’t do that. She will be the acting president by then.

If Brandon doesn’t get 25th Amendment’s out by then, however, she couldn’t do it for all the reasons Pence concluded he wouldn’t be allowed to do it either.

Interestingly, I think the door is slightly open upon a fair reading of the Constitution. But the requisite circumstances are unlikely to ever occur.

 

[excalibur]

Meanwhile, leftoids forget how they protested electoral votes in Congress for several Republicans.

 

[FA_Q2]

Of course Kamala can’t do that. She will be the acting president by then.

If Brandon doesn’t get 25th Amendment’s out by then, however, she couldn’t do it for all the reasons Pence concluded he wouldn’t be allowed to do it either.

Interestingly, I think the door is slightly open upon a fair reading of the Constitution. But the requisite circumstances are unlikely to ever occur.

The answer is pretty simple.

Update the Electoral Count Act.

Universally opposed by democrats. Because it would hurt the political talking point.


Sure, its only the right that places party over country.
/sarcasm

 

[okfine]

"No, no, no, no, no, no!" the former Trump aide reacted to the questions posed by MSNBC's Ari Melber.

Former White House trade adviser Peter Navarro apparently thinks it would have been OK for then-Vice President Mike Pence to challenge the 2020 election results , but not for current Vice President Kamala Harris to do the same in 2024.

After claiming that Pence has the ability to throw votes that might be “suspicious” back to the states, Navarro got into a bit of a tizzy when MSNBC’s Ari Melber asked him on Thursday: “It would follow, from your contention, that Vice President Harris should ultimately have the call over who should be president, regardless of the results in the next election?”

Navarro, who was subpoenaed on Wednesday by the House Jan. 6 committee, objected to Melber’s question.

“It’s not for the vice president to determine who wins. The only thing Pence had the authority to do was go back to the states and let the states look at the votes,” he said.

Of course, Navarro ignored the most basic point of his plan: The votes can’t go back to the states unless a vice president like Pence or Harris goes along with the scam.

Peter Navarro Gets Testy When Asked If Kamala Harris Can Throw Out Election Results

"No, no, no, no, no, no!" the former Trump aide reacted to the questions posed by MSNBC's Ari Melber.

www.huffpost.com

Peter Navarro sounds like a loose canon. What do you think?

That guy is a loon. What still makes me scratch my head is how the Trump's found that guy. On the friggin internet. "Hey lets hire that guy" Un fn real and it's true.

 

[BackAgain]

I know. I’m partly guilty. But still: how the bloody blue fuck does an imbecile thread like this get all the way to a count of 7 or more posts?

 

[Lakhota]

I know. I’m partly guilty. But still: how the bloody blue fuck does an imbecile thread like this get all the way to a count of 7 or more posts?

Duh, maybe because it's factual political news...

 

[BackAgain]

Duh, maybe because it's factual political news...

No. Obviously not.

First, you idiot libtards assured us that Pence would have had no legal right or Constitutional authority to refuse to certify the election. But now, you hypocrites aren’t so sure?

We all know hack bullshit when we see it. Most often, it is posted by you or your fellow libtard hack trolls.

 

[Lakhota]

No. Obviously not.

First, you idiot libtards assured us that Pence would have had no legal right or Constitutional authority to refuse to certify the election. But now, you hypocrites aren’t so sure?

We all know hack bullshit when we see it. Most often, it is posted by you or your fellow libtard hack trolls.

Duh, do you have a "comprehension" problem?

 

[BackAgain]

Duh, do you have a "comprehension" problem?

No. That appears to be more up your alley. Duh. Good word. Maybe you can overuse it some more?

 

[basquebromance]

here's the full 20-minute interview:

 

[Lakhota]

Shame on Peter.