Pete Buttigeg "Mentee" Arrested For Fifty-Six Child Porn Related Charges

I was going to say my mistake because I didn't add Mentee in there before, but I still highly doubt that I would have gotten in trouble for it. It wasn't report worthy.
Accusing the Secretary of Transportation of getting arrested for child pornography isn't worthy of reporting? Bullshit!

You probably got a lot of people's hopes up for nothing!

Oh, BTW, BR posted this story about 7-8 hours ago.
 
I was going to say my mistake because I didn't add Mentee in there before, but I still highly doubt that I would have gotten in trouble for it. It wasn't report worthy.
I was going to say my mistake because I didn't add Mentee in there before, but I still highly doubt that I would have gotten in trouble for it. It wasn't report worthy.
You are correct. Not in trouble but thread locked for the phony, provocative false title, as violation of clean start.
 
File unlocked after OP changed name.


Thank you I guess it was just the Admiral's word of "report" that set me on the edge. Made it seem like I was trolling or did it on purpose or something. Notifying the mods would have been better.
 
in his memoir, Pete's husband Chasten says the 1st time he noticed he's gay was when he saw a group of "naked Germans"

also, a friend of his called him out for supporting George Bush, and he felt ashamed for his "irreversible act, sacrificing my values to blend in with other people"
 
in his memoir, Pete's husband Chasten says the 1st time he noticed he's gay was when he saw a group of "naked Germans"

also, a friend of his called him out for supporting George Bush, and he felt ashamed for his "irreversible act, sacrificing my values to blend in with other people"


This isn't about him being gay this is about him being a pedophile.
 
"when some of the boys were changing around me, it made me feel a certain way" - Chasten Buttigieg
 
There isn't any evidence presented here to suggest that Buttigieg is a paedophile. It is wrong to suggest he is in the absence of such evidence.

But suppose this man was someone known to Buttigieg, perhaps someone he had advised in the past -- a 'mentee'.

Well, so what? Buttigieg is not a mind reader. Unless there is evidence that Buttigieg knew that this man was distributing child pornography -- and not just that he had paedophile tendencies -- then this is a nothing-burger.

We should not play "guilt by association", if for no other reason, that two can play at that game. Here's an example: [ Republican Sex Offenders Disclosed—Who’s the Cruelest? ] (Note that they lump men who supposedly made a pass at a 16-year old, with men who molested 6-year olds.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top