Permanent injunction against 10 round magazine ban? In California? Excellent....

[bripat9643]

Oh Boy!

Now you can go out and shoot 'em up without worrying about running out of ammo.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

 

[Crepitus]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

You live under a rock?
View attachment 253099

that is just begging for a jam!

 

[Crepitus]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

 

[Harpy Eagle]

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

You have much better things to do while we’re out playing “Rambo”...right?
Is that you on the left?

Are you the one of the left or the right?

 

[Crepitus]

only amateurs would use a large capacity magazine. They jam way more often and it takes only a couple seconds to change a magazine if you know what you are doing.

Something else that never gets mentioned is how much of a pain they are to load.

If you don't want to lad them then don't buy them. Problem solved.

I don't.

They are for wannabe Rambo nut-jobs.

You have much better things to do while we’re out playing “Rambo”...right?
Is that you on the left?

Don't be stupier than you have to be son.

 

[daveman]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

 

[daveman]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

 

[Rigby5]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

 

[Crepitus]

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

 

[BrokeLoser]

That Caucasian hating filthy fuck Gavin Newsom is all over this...bank on it.

 

[Rigby5]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

It is illegal under the 14th amendment to give police officers additional rights or powers beyond that of any ordinary citizen.
Government is NOT a source of any legal authority in a democratic republic.
The ONLY source of any legal authority in a democratic republic is the inherent rights of all individuals.
So the ability of police to have arms come solely from the right of all individuals to have arms. The police can not legally have any other arms than those all individuals can have.

 

[Crepitus]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

 

[bripat9643]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

 

[Rigby5]

I have over 300 high capacity magazines. Never shot anybody. I use them for legal purposes. Why should my Constitutional right be infringed because infrequently somebody does something illegal?

Honorable Judge Roger T. Benitez, born in Havana Cuba. He understands what freedom is.

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

 

[Crepitus]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

It is illegal under the 14th amendment to give police officers additional rights or powers beyond that of any ordinary citizen.
Government is NOT a source of any legal authority in a democratic republic.
The ONLY source of any legal authority in a democratic republic is the inherent rights of all individuals.
So the ability of police to have arms come solely from the right of all individuals to have arms. The police can not legally have any other arms than those all individuals can have.

Yeah... You aren't gonna get very far with that

 

[Rigby5]

This is a great ruling. Commie California's high capacity magazine ban has been overturned by the court.

It is about time Liberty prevailed after all this silly oppressive Libtard SJW bullshit.

The Legal Definition of what is Prohibited under California Penal Code 32310. Under Penal Code 32310(a), it is a crime if any person: manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine.

"Accordingly, based upon the law and the evidence, upon which there is no genuine issue, and for the reasons stated in this opinion, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted. California Penal Code § 32310 is hereby declared to be unconstitutional in its entirety and shall be enjoined."

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...-2019-03-29-Order-Granting-Plaintiffs-MSJ.pdf

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

Cops are not supposed to outgun people in order to kill them instead of arresting them.
Cops are supposed to use superior numbers and technology in order to get them to surrender so they can be arrested and tried. Not just shot by police. The goal should not be for the police to ever fire a single shot. When they do, they are likely screwing up badly, and they can and do kill innocents by the over shots.

 

[Crepitus]

How nice for you.

How long untill the spree starts?

When are you going to cut off your dick to prevent rape?

Ah, the tried and true "argument of the extremes".

Not applicable in this case sadly. No one is asking him to mutilate himself.

You're demanding people give up things that they have no history of nor plans to commit crimes with.

You don't get to dictate what people need.

Lmao @ "need".

The LA riots showed that Korean grocers needed high capacity magazines.
The Katrina looting also showed that.
The people who actually need them the least are the police and military, since no one has ever attacked the police, and the military in this country has not been attacked since 1812.
The people who are attacked all the time are the average citizens.

Delusions of grandeur.

 

[Rigby5]

The way the founders wanted it, is that you do NOT ever want a mercenary police force or military that are working for pay.
Why?
Because those that work for pay will always do what those who pay them tell them to do.
And that is always corrupt.

So there should be no paid police or military force.
Instead, all citizens should have mandatory, universal training in High School, and that would end the need for a paid police force or military.
We instead would rely on citizen soldiers, as the founders wanted.

And in which case, clearly there would be no need for laws against high capacity magazines.

I think private security can replace the government run police forces. Most corporations rely on it now. They don't actually expect the police to protect their property.

Private security is even worse, because you do not get to vote out their leaders if they become exceptionally abusive and corrupt.
No, the law is that all able bodied are supposed to be members of the militia, according to the state constitutions, and they are supposed to then protect themselves, neighbors, municipalities, states, and the federal government, as needed.
The only way it can really work is if all people are involved in responsibly defending themselves as much as possible.
As soon as you pay people, it becomes increasingly corrupt.

 

[Crepitus]

Right, because liberty means being able to shoot as many people as possible should you decide to.

Up to 30 Shots Fired In Squad-Sized Home Invasion In Texas

You know the ban wouldn't apply to police officers..

Of course not. The State should have no limitations on its potential for violence.

How else you gonna keep the proles in line?

Wait, so you're upset that the criminals wouldn't out gun the cops?

Cops are not supposed to outgun people in order to kill them instead of arresting them.
Cops are supposed to use superior numbers and technology in order to get them to surrender so they can be arrested and tried. Not just shot by police. The goal should not be for the police to ever fire a single shot. When they do, they are likely screwing up badly, and they can and do kill innocents by the over shots.

That doesn't answer my question.