berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,241
- 21,234
- 2,320
President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration. He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration
President Trump entered the White House with the goal of reducing legal immigration by 63 percent. Trump was wildly successful in reducing legal immigration. By November 2020, the Trump administration reduced the number of green cards issued to people abroad by at least 418,453 and the number of non‐immigrant visas by at least 11,178,668 during his first term through November 2020. President Trump also entered the White House with the goal of eliminating illegal immigration but Trump oversaw a virtual collapse in interior immigration enforcement and the stabilization of the illegal immigrant population. Thus, Trump succeeded in reduce legal immigration and failed to eliminate illegal immigration.

President Trump Reduced Legal Immigration. He Did Not Reduce Illegal Immigration
The population of illegal immigrants remained about the same as when he took office.
I could be mistaken, but my impression is supporters of all things Don think his admin had great success in reducing illegal immigration. Or what right wingers like to call (since a Dem is in the WH) the invasion at the border. The numbers tell a different story.
As it happens, there are a number of misconceptions about Don's tenure reverberating around the right wing media sound chamber. Here are a few more.
The international trade deficit Trump promised to reduce went up. The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services in 2020 was the highest since 2008 and increased 40.5% from 2016. The number of Americans lacking health insurance rose by 3 million. The federal debt held by the public went up, from $14.4 trillion to $21.6 trillion.
Tax reform worked? Trump’s tax cut conferred most of its benefits on big corporations and the rich, while enlarging the budget deficit. Giant banks and financial services companies got huge gains based on the new, lower corporate rate (21%), as well as the more preferable tax treatment of pass-through companies.
Right about China? As the Brookings Institution found, Trump’s China policy only made China less restrained in pursuit of its ambitions. Confrontation has intensified, areas of cooperation have vanished, and the capacity of both countries to solve problems or manage competing interests has atrophied.

Why Jamie Dimon loves Trump’s policies
A frightening example of the integrity-crushing intimidation of a possible Trump administration

So here's the thing. I hear over and over from Trump devotees their support of him is based on his policy successes. IOW, The Following is still The Following despite his legal and moral violations because he was an affective prez. Was he? But hey, he sure did get the libtards upset and isn't that what really matters?
***Mod Edit: Red text is used by mods. Please refrain from using it. Yes, it is noted in the forum rules.
Last edited by a moderator: