People did get what they voted for when they voted for Trump

[Votto]

He told you repeatedly that Iran was never to have a nuke.

I've even heard democrats say the same thing.

The only way to prevent that is war.

Now I know that the Left is full of people who insist that diplomacy could have worked, insisting that the Obama agreement with Iran was the way out of this. However, after the Obama administration infused Iran with billions of dollars in their little agreement, 10/7 happened because Iran funds terrorism via Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Iran swore the destruction of the US and Israel upon their revolution and that has never changed, and will never change.

Wanting diplomacy with Iran is akin to wanting diplomacy with Nazi Germany.

Would most people here have preferred to let Iran have a WMD, wait for them to use it, and then respond?

 

[rightwinger]

However, after the Obama administration infused Iran with billions of dollars in their little agreement, 10/7 happened because Iran funds terrorism via Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis.

You act like Irans only access to money was Obama giving sanction money back
Are you aware that Iran is a major oil producer?

 

[yidnar]

You act like Irans only access to money was Obama giving sanction money back
Are you aware that Iran is a major oil producer?

wont do em much good with the Strait closed ..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He told you repeatedly that Iran was never to have a nuke.

I've even heard democrats say the same thing.

The only way to prevent that is war.

Now I know that the Left is full of people who insist that diplomacy could have worked, insisting that the Obama agreement with Iran was the way out of this. However, after the Obama administration infused Iran with billions of dollars in their little agreement, 10/7 happened because Iran funds terrorism via Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Iran swore the destruction of the US and Israel upon their revolution and that has never changed, and will never change.

Wanting diplomacy with Iran is akin to wanting diplomacy with Nazi Germany.

Would most people here have preferred to let Iran have a WMD, wait for them to use it, and then respond?

One day, you'll look back on this and realize you got played

 

[rightwinger]

wont do em much good with the Strait closed ..

They have Trump by the balls

 

[Winston]

He told you repeatedly that Iran was never to have a nuke.

I've even heard democrats say the same thing.

The only way to prevent that is war.

Now I know that the Left is full of people who insist that diplomacy could have worked, insisting that the Obama agreement with Iran was the way out of this. However, after the Obama administration infused Iran with billions of dollars in their little agreement, 10/7 happened because Iran funds terrorism via Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Iran swore the destruction of the US and Israel upon their revolution and that has never changed, and will never change.

Wanting diplomacy with Iran is akin to wanting diplomacy with Nazi Germany.

Would most people here have preferred to let Iran have a WMD, wait for them to use it, and then respond?

First, Iran was not even close to producing a nuclear bomb. They do not have enough highly enriched uranium to make one bomb. They may, may, have some enriched uranium, maybe 60%, or even 80%, that they could process to get enough for a bomb. But that would come out a cost to their agricultural and medical needs. From cancer screening to production of new cotton seed varieties, highly enriched uranium is required. And I am here to tell you, those new cotton strains are looking pretty damn good.

But they got no trigger. That is the key to the puzzle and Iran is no where near Boosted Fission capability. They would be more likely to blow themselves up than anything else. One again, the United States has jumped the shark.

 

[Votto]

First, Iran was not even close to producing a nuclear bomb. They do not have enough highly enriched uranium to make one bomb. They may, may, have some enriched uranium, maybe 60%, or even 80%, that they could process to get enough for a bomb. But that would come out a cost to their agricultural and medical needs. From cancer screening to production of new cotton seed varieties, highly enriched uranium is required. And I am here to tell you, those new cotton strains are looking pretty damn good.

But they got no trigger. That is the key to the puzzle and Iran is no where near Boosted Fission capability. They would be more likely to blow themselves up than anything else. One again, the United States has jumped the shark.

Says who?

 

[Winston]

They have Trump by the balls

It is bad. Iran is going to implement a toll plan. Pakistan is already moving ships through. Payment in Rial required, Iran's currency. Flipping brilliant. Any country participating in sanctions against Iran, no passage for you.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

First, Iran was not even close to producing a nuclear bomb. They do not have enough highly enriched uranium to make one bomb. They may, may, have some enriched uranium, maybe 60%, or even 80%, that they could process to get enough for a bomb. But that would come out a cost to their agricultural and medical needs. From cancer screening to production of new cotton seed varieties, highly enriched uranium is required. And I am here to tell you, those new cotton strains are looking pretty damn good.

But they got no trigger. That is the key to the puzzle and Iran is no where near Boosted Fission capability. They would be more likely to blow themselves up than anything else. One again, the United States has jumped the shark.

Plus our prewar Intel assessments found that Iran was NOT a threat to develop nuclear weapons and further that an attack would NOT result in regime change

 

[Winston]

Says who?

To be as close as Trump claimed to having a conventional nuclear weapon, Iran would have needed to secure and enrich that gas to 90 percent in centrifuges, extract and chemically separate it back to solid uranium, shape it into spheres of uranium metal (a task that is “not simple,” Rofer says) and then construct explosive devices around them.

Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say

Although President Trump has claimed Iran was weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon, much more work was needed for the country to do so

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[EMH]

If Fox News says 100 times "Iran cannot have a nuke" that is proof that they are trying to get one.... NOT.


There is no denying what Fox News is all about. It isn't about America. It isn't about conservatism.

It is about lying to America to justify selling out our troops to serve Israel. PERIOD.








The OP here parroted every lie used to sell out our troops in Iraq. He has never admitted they were lies, never apologized for parroting the lies, he just cares about selling out our troops to fight for Israel. He isn't a conservative or a patriotic American. But he does fully represent the post 1998 Only Israel Matters "Republican Party" and is Exhibit A of why America needs a robust third party that is fiscally conservative and patriotic to America.

 

[Votto]

Plus our prewar Intel assessments found that Iran was NOT a threat to develop nuclear weapons and further that an attack would NOT result in regime change

Says who?



Who's intel will you believe?

 

[Lisa558]

He told you repeatedly that Iran was never to have a nuke.

I've even heard democrats say the same thing.

The only way to prevent that is war.

Now I know that the Left is full of people who insist that diplomacy could have worked, insisting that the Obama agreement with Iran was the way out of this. However, after the Obama administration infused Iran with billions of dollars in their little agreement, 10/7 happened because Iran funds terrorism via Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Iran swore the destruction of the US and Israel upon their revolution and that has never changed, and will never change.

Wanting diplomacy with Iran is akin to wanting diplomacy with Nazi Germany.

Would most people here have preferred to let Iran have a WMD, wait for them to use it, and then respond?

Just think where we’d be if Harris had won: A nuclear-armed Islamic Terrorist Regime.

 

[Lisa558]

They have Trump by the balls

You sound HAPPY thinking that Islamic terrorists have America by the balls.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Says who?



Who's intel will you believe?

I believe Bill O'Reilly!

Forget the US Intel Agencies that said:

1. Iran is not a threat to America, and
2. Iran has no plans to develop a nuclear weapon

Jared's Spidey sense was tingling, that's all Trump needed to hear

 

[ekrem]

China supports both Iran and Russia.
China has the industrial, technological, financial power to support additional countries/fronts.

As things stand of today the USA miscalculated very badly in this new Middle-Eastern Jew war

 

[80zephyr]

One day, you'll look back on this and realize you got played

In what way? Is Iran a threat or not?

 

[Darkwind]

First, Iran was not even close to producing a nuclear bomb. They do not have enough highly enriched uranium to make one bomb. They may, may, have some enriched uranium, maybe 60%, or even 80%, that they could process to get enough for a bomb. But that would come out a cost to their agricultural and medical needs. From cancer screening to production of new cotton seed varieties, highly enriched uranium is required. And I am here to tell you, those new cotton strains are looking pretty damn good.

But they got no trigger. That is the key to the puzzle and Iran is no where near Boosted Fission capability. They would be more likely to blow themselves up than anything else. One again, the United States has jumped the shark.

This is an outright bald faced lie.

The Iranians themselves said they had enough for 11 bombs.

 

[Lisa558]

China supports both Iran and Russia.
China has the industrial, technological, financial power to support additional countries/fronts.

As things stand of today the USA miscalculated very badly in this new Middle-Eastern Jew war

“Jew war”.

Anyone notice that antisemites who joined 20 years ago and nobody ever heard of all of a sudden rise from the dead to spew their Jew-hate?

This site has an issue with antisemites hacking into dormant accounts.

 

[Winston]

Plus our prewar Intel assessments foud that Iran was NOT a threat to develop nuclear weapons and further that an attack would NOT result in regome change

I am really not sure what is going on here. There is a reason we have never attacked Iran in the past, and to do it now, they were just not thinking. I am honestly concerned, we are more vulnerable, today, than we were prior to WWII. And that is not all Trump's fault, it is his fault for not knowing the absolute deplorable conditions are military is in, and that is due to a generation of failure in Washington, not a single party.

I had no idea how bad it is. First, at this very moment we cannot defend air superiority in any two territories at the same time. I mean we just can't do it. Hell, Iran shoots down one E-3 and we all to shit. We have a shortage of those planes, they are old as shit, we can't defend two theaters. Especially against drones. And while detection is one thing, hell, we don't have the air-to-air missiles. I mean the air force barely has a 50% available to fly ratio, wtf?

Navy, what a damn shit show. Here again, two theaters, fuugat about it. Mine sweepers? What's that? Can we please call France? Subs so damn old I would be scared shitless onboard, I bet they moan and groan like an old roller coaster. And that is just it, like the Air Force, fleet as old as shit. But worse, we can't build them near fast enough. Sad.

And the Army. Flipping bullets. Yeah, damn bullets. Special bullets, for taking out drones. I mean have you seen what is going on in Ukraine? Damn drones chasing soldiers, scary shit. So, there is a special bullet, kind of like a shotgun blast in a rifle charge, little mini bullets breaking out. Highly effective. Oh well, we might start making them soon. WTF?