Pennsylvania rolling out race-based grants for businesses. NOT AVILABLE TO WHITES

[IM2]

Wikipedia:

By 1830, there were 3,775 black (including mixed-race) slaveholders in the South who owned a total of 12,760 slaves, which was a small percentage of a total of over two million slaves then held in the South.[6] 80% of the black slaveholders were located in Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia and Maryland.

There were economic and ethnic differences between free blacks of the Upper South and the Deep South, with the latter fewer in number, but wealthier and typically of mixed race. Half of the black slaveholders lived in cities rather than the countryside, with most living in New Orleans and Charleston. In particular, New Orleans had a large, relatively wealthy free black population (gens de couleur) composed of people of mixed race, who had become a third social class between whites and enslaved blacks, under French and Spanish colonial rule. Relatively few non-white slaveholders were substantial planters; of those who were, most were of mixed race, often endowed by white fathers with some property and social capital.

That's less than 4 slaves per person. Don't try this with me son, I know the whole story.

Most slaves purchased family members which essentially freed them. You are talking about 0.00638 percent of all slaves owned. 99 percent of the slaves were owned by whites. So again, talk about the story accurately instead of being disingenuous, and really, you should not be using this tactic with someone black.

 

[IM2]

White racist? How about strongly opposed the WEF/Soros illegal immigrant importation project? Not keen on Islam becoming the next official religion of Deutschland.

Populism on the rise in the EU........wonder why?


Biden put his nod on it.......

The republican party is a white racist party.

 

[Delldude]

Don't try this with me son, I know the whole story.

Do some reading.....

Black Master. It is difficult to digest, but numerous records indicate that thousands of free people of color in the antebellum South did in fact own slaves. Not only did they own slaves but, in some instances, they harshly disciplined and sold their slaves. In other instances, they treated them well and ultimately freed them. How and why they acted as they did was bound with the reasons why they became “Black Masters” in the first place.

Scholars initially focused on two main interpretations for decades until recent scholarship revealed a more complex antebellum southern society. One school of thought argued that African American slave owners were motivated by ties of family or friendship and were essentially benevolent. They were purchasing their spouses, children, parents, siblings, or friends in danger of being sold into a worse situation. In other words, they were well-intentioned would-be emancipators. If they were not well-intentioned would-be emancipators, then they must have been “race traitors” and equally or more morally corrupt than White slaveholders.

This research reveals another interpretation that has not been explored due to scholars’ tendency to overlook the nuances found in the lives of individual ex-slaves. Specifically, the focus of this research is not on the phenomenon of Black slaveholding but on how Black individuals whose lives were intertwined with White slaveholders created a culture that led to their transformation into “Black Masters” once they themselves were free.

Black Masters; The Ownership of Slaves by Free People of Color in the Antebellum South 1780-1861

Black Master. It is difficult to digest, but numerous records indicate that thousands of free people of color in the antebellum South did in fact own slaves. Not only did they own slaves but, in some instances, they harshly disciplined and sold their slaves. In other instances, they treated them...

scholarworks.umb.edu

 

[Delldude]

The republican party is a white racist party.

Must be why more and more blacks are coming over........

 

[ThisIsMe]

Everything.

What about it was driven by race?