I asked if you all would approve of such a law, I did not way it was in place yet. Interestingly none of you have been opposed to it yet
Nah, nah, nah, you don't get off that easy. You asked for opinions on a law that does not exist and IMHO never will. If I'm not mistaken, once the election is over and the results are in and confirmed by the appropriate election leadership, the legislature approves/confirms the results, do they not? Some crackpot may offer up that proposition, but I predict it'll go nowhere. But, since
"none of you have been opposed to it yet", let me be the 1st.
Once an election is over, IMHO it's OVER. Meaning, after everyone has signed off on it and gone home, it's a done deal. If the loser wants to cry foul and piss and moan about it for however long, so be it. 1st amendment and all that. It does not put him or her is a positive light and could be costly in political terms, and I say that without regard to one side or the other, or one person or another. AND - since the time frame between the election period and the inauguration of the new Congress and President is kinda short, we ought to be thinking about one of two things: 1) push back the inauguration day to allow more time for objections and allegations, * and 2) state legislatures should propose and adopt any necessary measure that improve the integrity and trust in the results. Right now there is quite a number of people that have some doubts or concerns about that 2020 election, by some estimates approaching 50%. We can't have that in this country. I so far as is possible, we should be doing what we can to allay that mistrust that delegitimizes our elected officals.
* added: could also move election day up to October
SO - I am opposed to any law that allows any state to reject and overturn the results of an election that has been confirmed. Hell, they don't have to accept the results in the 1st place, do they? If they don't have the balls to do it in December after the election is over then sorry Charlie.