Pelousy In A Pickle

WillPower

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2018
6,989
2,246
360
SanFranNan doesn't have the votes to start an official impeachment inquiry, which is the precedent whether she likes it or not. She handed the ball off to Schitt who spiked it, then threw it into the peanut gallery. The second "whistleblower" is sketchier than the first one, and remember it could still be a disgruntled John Bolton. Neither Nadler or the pencil neck Schitt can get anybody into their secret chambers, where they planned on leaking but have nothing to leak. What's Nancy gonna do? How does she hit the brakes and claim it was all a misunderstanding? Is bringing up the USMCA for a vote enough of a peace-offering to get Trump off their asses? What happens when Barr and Durham lower the boom? Why is Barry so quiet? Poor old Pelousy....and her face....is that botox or is she turning to stone?
117537-98aabc77dde0769fc46fef528a3c535e.jpg


694940094001_6093112771001_6093111284001-vs.jpg
 
SanFranNan doesn't have the votes to start an official impeachment inquiry, which is the precedent whether she likes it or not. She handed the ball off to Schitt who spiked it, then threw it into the peanut gallery. The second "whistleblower" is sketchier than the first one, and remember it could still be a disgruntled John Bolton. Neither Nadler or the pencil neck Schitt can get anybody into their secret chambers, where they planned on leaking but have nothing to leak. What's Nancy gonna do? How does she hit the brakes and claim it was all a misunderstanding? Is bringing up the USMCA for a vote enough of a peace-offering to get Trump off their asses? What happens when Barr and Durham lower the boom? Why is Barry so quiet? Poor old Pelousy....and her face....is that botox or is she turning to stone?

The worst thing is that they only dug up a 2nd "whistleblower" after it was shown that the 1st one didn't even have first hand knowledge of the events to which he was claiming! And now they know that if they try to move forward with this, they will give Trump's team the legal opening it needs to unleash all its evidence on the Democrats!

CHECKMATE!

Foiled again by a lone, orange real estate developer. Sucks to be a democrat.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
The worst thing is that they only dug up a 2nd "whistleblower" after it was shown that the 1st one didn't even have first hand knowledge of the events to which he was claiming! And now they know that if they try to move forward with this, they will give Trump's team the legal opening it needs to unleash all its evidence on the Democrats!

CHECKMATE!

Foiled again by a lone, orange real estate developer. Sucks to be a democrat.

There's a pretty good chance the second one is who gave the first one the story...which makes them both fact witnesses who will be required to testify in open session. Whatever happens, they're both finished working for the CIA/government..dumbasses.
 
there is "NO RULE" saying the House has to vote to begin an inquiry.

once again stupid shit Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama.

F'EM -
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Word on the drum says Pelousy has called an "emergency meeting" with her fellow traitors. Does the fact that the Ukes restarted the investigation into the Biden kid's shenanigans months before Trump's call to the new president have anything to do with this? :badgrin:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
there is "NO RULE" saying the House has to vote to begin an inquiry.

once again stupid shit Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama.

F'EM -

PRECEDENT, dumbass.....Andrew Johnson, Nixon, Clinton all were done after a vote to proceed.....you lose (like always).
 
They are using the "whistle blower" statues as both a sword and a shield.

A whistle blower will eventually be required to testify. They can't drop this kind of bomb and hide.

.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
They are using the "whistle blower" statues as both a sword and a shield.

A whistle blower will eventually be required to testify. They can't drop this kind of bomb and hide.

.

I think they believed they could pull off the "man behind the curtain" tactic like a mobster testifying against his crime family. They also tossed around the idea of having him/her testify by telephone with a voice-disguising gadget. Not going to happen....I hope it's Bolton....I'll laugh my ass off if it's Bolton.
 
there is "NO RULE" saying the House has to vote to begin an inquiry.

once again stupid shit Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama.

F'EM -

PRECEDENT, dumbass.....Andrew Johnson, Nixon, Clinton all were done after a vote to proceed.....you lose (like always).

DUMBER THAN A DOOR KNOB ^^^^^^^^^^^

House rules have changed since the last impeachment of a president more than two decades ago. In this Congress, the House majority already has unilateral subpoena power, a rule change that was made when Republicans last controlled the House, so Democrats don't need to pass any resolution to grant those powers.

ass, meet Alabama.

GFY idiotboi.
 
Last edited:
DUMBER THAN A DOOR KNOB ^^^^^^^^^^^

House rules have changed since the last impeachment of a president more than two decades ago. In this Congress, the House majority already has unilateral subpoena power, a rule change that was made when Republicans last controlled the House, so Democrats don't need to pass any resolution to grant those powers.

ass, meet Alabama.

GFY idiotboi.

Threaten to shoot the President lately, nutcase? BTW, the USSC will decide the issue if it lasts that long....my bet is Pelousy is hitting the brakes...maybe today. I'm delighted you have to endure another 5+ years of MAGA.....suck on it.
 
The worst thing is that they only dug up a 2nd "whistleblower" after it was shown that the 1st one didn't even have first hand knowledge of the events to which he was claiming! And now they know that if they try to move forward with this, they will give Trump's team the legal opening it needs to unleash all its evidence on the Democrats!

CHECKMATE!

Foiled again by a lone, orange real estate developer. Sucks to be a democrat.

There's a pretty good chance the second one is who gave the first one the story...which makes them both fact witnesses who will be required to testify in open session. Whatever happens, they're both finished working for the CIA/government..dumbasses.
someone on tv said they call it a feedback loop for leakers.
 
there is "NO RULE" saying the House has to vote to begin an inquiry.

once again stupid shit Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama.

F'EM -

Then it's not an official inquiry, carries no legal weight and no one can be compelled to turn over jack. For all we know, they are debating again whether Popeyes or Kentucky Fried Chicken.

$.jpg


What the Democrats do best: waste people's money and time.

Hey Marge! Can you pass the Taters and Cole Slaw?
 
there is "NO RULE" saying the House has to vote to begin an inquiry.

once again stupid shit Trumpbots dont know their ass from Alabama.

F'EM -

Then it's not an official inquiry, carries no legal weight and no one can be compelled to turn over jack. For all we know, they are debating again whether Popeyes or Kentucky Fried Chicken.

View attachment 283715

What the Democrats do best: waste people's money and time.

Hey Marge! Can you pass the Taters and Cole Slaw?
talk of no class. wow.
 

Forum List

Back
Top