Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

If its so bad if Trump does it, why threaten to do it yourself?

What happened to "moral high ground", liberals?
 
This national emergency will now open up a can of worms for all kinds of new emergencies...once the cat is out of the bag there is no going back.
 
The only "national emergency" that currently exists for Trump, is that he desperately needs to hold on to hls on to his moronic base.

Otherwise, the "emergency" to build a wall would have been declared TWO years ago.

The only way Trump holds on to his base is if the wall starts to get built, and not just 1.6 billion of it either.

Honestly, I don't think he's lost much support if the wall hadn't gotten built. I mean, considering everything else he's done, I certainty wouldn't hold him accountable for the BS resistance he's had to put up with from not only the Dems, but his own party.
 
The Democrats are just showing the world that they will fight for illegal aliens, gangs, drug smugglers and human traffickers

".....and FOX news will be back after these commercials....."

IF "illegals" were the MOST pressing problem causing a "national emergency"
WHY WAS A WALL BUILT WHEN GOPers CONTROLLED EVERYTHING???

Because you know as well as I do that they did NOT have a filibusterer proof majority. Having 1 more than the opposing party does not equal "having control" when liberals threaten to filibuster everything.
 
5c65ef9020000001016ea753.png


The House speaker warned Republicans about the precedent Trump could set by declaring a national emergency to secure border wall funding.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday warned about the dangerous precedent President Donald Trump could set if he declares a national emergency to secure funding for his border wall.

“I know the Republicans have some unease about it, no matter what they say,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol. “Because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.”

Pelosi said the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border doesn’t constitute an “emergency,” as Trump has framed it, but rather a “humanitarian challenge.”

“You want to talk about a national emergency?” Pelosi said. “Let’s talk about today, the one-year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency.”

Pelosi was referring to the Feb. 14, 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. She noted that a Democratic president could declare a national emergency on gun violence and warned Republicans to carefully consider the precedent Trump would set by using his executive power to override Congress.

“Democratic presidents can declare emergencies as well,” Pelosi said. “So the precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans.”

More: Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

What goes around comes around. Go Nancy!

The Democrat field should definitely run on that.

Open borders, higher taxes and a gun ban.
 
National gun violence is a major problem. Much bigger than Trump's fear-mongering about more border wall.

It may be a problem but not an emergency. Guns are protected by the Constitution as has already been pointed out.

Yeah, pretty much that. The lefts is trying to use scarecrow tactics but the truth is, Second Amendment, bitches.

Can't touch that and even if they tried, too many of us would not comply.
 
The difference between the wall and taking away guns is a piece of paper call the Constitution and in the Constitution is the 2nd Amendment that stops the government from confiscating guns.
 
Because you know as well as I do that they did NOT have a filibusterer proof majority. Having 1 more than the opposing party does not equal "having control" when liberals threaten to filibuster everything.


You mean that Trump could NOT have declared a "national emergency" when he didn't have a filibuster-proof majority???..........REALLY ?............LOL
 
The Democrats are just showing the world that they will fight for illegal aliens, gangs, drug smugglers and human traffickers

".....and FOX news will be back after these commercials....."

IF "illegals" were the MOST pressing problem causing a "national emergency"
WHY WAS A WALL BUILT WHEN GOPers CONTROLLED EVERYTHING???
they were getting the funding the last two years
 
Hopefully those workers building the wall get paid fairly unlike alot of construction workers. 40 bucks per hour is a decent start.
 
Because you know as well as I do that they did NOT have a filibusterer proof majority. Having 1 more than the opposing party does not equal "having control" when liberals threaten to filibuster everything.


You mean that Trump could NOT have declared a "national emergency" when he didn't have a filibuster-proof majority???..........REALLY ?............LOL

If you so said offered him 25 billion before, why not just offer it again? And Trump ran on the wall. The wall funding was tied to DACA which he did not support. He wanted a clean bill on the wall and one never came,
 
Obama opened the "emergency" can of worms 12 times and this dizzy bitch fears President Trump might set precedent? She's so afflicted that she's already forgotten everything about Regime Obama and his 12-event exercise of dictatorial powers. The precedent is long since set. Suck it up.
 
How would the democrat party version of a "national emergency on guns" work? A suspension of Constitutional rights while federal thugs ransack homes of innocent people looking for guns? The ironic thing is that a Wall on the southern border might decrease the proliferation of illegal weapons but democrats would rather stomp on the rights of innocent people.
 
5c65ef9020000001016ea753.png


The House speaker warned Republicans about the precedent Trump could set by declaring a national emergency to secure border wall funding.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday warned about the dangerous precedent President Donald Trump could set if he declares a national emergency to secure funding for his border wall.

“I know the Republicans have some unease about it, no matter what they say,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol. “Because if the president can declare an emergency on something that he has created as an emergency, an illusion that he wants to convey, just think of what a president with different values can present to the American people.”

Pelosi said the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border doesn’t constitute an “emergency,” as Trump has framed it, but rather a “humanitarian challenge.”

“You want to talk about a national emergency?” Pelosi said. “Let’s talk about today, the one-year anniversary of another manifestation of the epidemic of gun violence in America. That’s a national emergency.”

Pelosi was referring to the Feb. 14, 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. She noted that a Democratic president could declare a national emergency on gun violence and warned Republicans to carefully consider the precedent Trump would set by using his executive power to override Congress.

“Democratic presidents can declare emergencies as well,” Pelosi said. “So the precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans.”

More: Pelosi To GOP: A Democratic President Could Declare National Emergency On Guns

What goes around comes around. Go Nancy!

Oh hell the fuck yes!

Do it!
 

Forum List

Back
Top