Pelosi slams SC as dangerous and refuses to bring bill protecting their families

tyroneweaver

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
28,747
Reaction score
15,184
Points
1,405
Location
Burley, Idaho
too busy getting dui charges against her husband dropped.

May 20, 2022
://www.huffpost.com/entry/nancy-pelosi-supreme-court-freedom-dangerous-freedoms-roe-v-wade_n_62818acbe4b0c2dce6519d14

Strip her of tax payer funding for her and her family's protection. Let her pay for it. She Dcan afford it.
 
We already have laws protecting their families

Same laws that protect yours and mine
 
Repubtards trying to waste more tax money pile on more job killing laws & regulations. The law protecting SC families already exists.

Title 18 U.S. Code § 1507​

This only protects the judges - the new bill would extend the protection to immediate family members.
Are you against that?
And, if passed, how exactly would it "kill jobs"?
 
This only protects the judges - the new bill would extend the protection to immediate family members.
Are you against that?
And, if passed, how exactly would it "kill jobs"?
Leftist 'Murder for Hire' jobs would decrease....?!

:p
 
It's a win-win for democrats. They create the climate of hatred that encourages maniacs to commit murder and then they blame the NRA and the 2nd Amendment.
 
This only protects the judges - the new bill would extend the protection to immediate family members.
Are you against that?
And, if passed, how exactly would it "kill jobs"?
You Lie!

"resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence"
 
Last edited:
You Lie! - "resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence"
How convenient that you omit what follows: "occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer".
Do you see "immediate family member" there? I don't.
Also your habit of prefacing your comments with "You Lie!" is getting really f**king old.
 
Last edited:
How convenient that you omit what follows: "occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer".
Do you see "immediate family" member there? I don't.
Also your habit of prefacing your comments with "You Lie!" is getting really f**king old.
Please show a family member that has been harmed.
 
Republicans better remember this after the election. But they won't.
 
Please show a family member that has been harmed.
How about an entire USSC Justice's family that had to be moved because of threats against the family?

It happened.
 
Our Supreme Court is unwilling to protect school children from slaughter with an AR 15

What happens to their family is no concern of mine
 
Repubtards trying to waste more tax money pile on more job killing laws & regulations. The law protecting SC families already exists.

Title 18 U.S. Code § 1507​

Then follow it and stop protesting outside their homes.
 
15th post
Protesting outside their ho.es with the intent of, through intimidation or threats, changing their votes is ILLEGAL.
 
too busy getting dui charges against her husband dropped.

May 20, 2022
://www.huffpost.com/entry/nancy-pelosi-supreme-court-freedom-dangerous-freedoms-roe-v-wade_n_62818acbe4b0c2dce6519d14

There are laws on the books, the Biden Administration just refuses to follow the law and protect them.
 
How about an entire USSC Justice's family that had to be moved because of threats against the family?

It happened.
So the system already protects the family. Why didn't they just arrest the threatening person?
 
Back
Top Bottom