if he would go to that SOTU address he would see the reasons that were laid out quite plainly
Pelosi says Bush team misled her on waterboarding
- Thread starter WillowTree
- Start date
Yes, I have a great memory too. These right wingers try to re write history all the time. One today said the media was always against bush when I remember them helping him lie us into war.
Freedom fries, boycotting canada, throwing away dixie chick cd's, etc.
But don't get too excited about proving Bush to be a criminal. When it is convienent, these people distance themselves from Bush so fast....
They'll just go play in the libertarian sand box until the dust settles and then come back when its safe.
no, thats you that is the ******* liar
but then, you might just be so totally delusional you cant tell the difference
who the **** was boycotting Canada?
certainly not me
and i never owned a Dixie Chicks cd
and never would
i dont like country music
Gunny
Gold Member
As long as you're around, Pelosi will never have to worry about having the most pathetically weak attempts to deflect.
Article 15
Dr. House slayer
- Jul 4, 2008
- 24,673
- 4,917
- 183
C'mon now.
The Bush Administration used the MSM to play up the WMD case. They knew exactly where to go to get the public to go along with the invasion.
No public support, no war.
Just ask Hillary.
Gunny
Gold Member
How many times did Bush change the reason for why we were in Iraq?
1. WMD's
2. To spread democracy
3. Because it was the central front on the war on terror
4. So the Iraqi central government could get started
5. Because Saddam was a bad man
you know the rules for posting copywritten material. follow them
None. You leftwingnuts picked and chose from the list of reasons given as it suited your intellectually dishonest accusations.
Gunny
Gold Member
Link? Back up your mouth or shut it down.
thats what i have been telling themthat's why they are DUmmies!
How many times did Bush change the reason for why we were in Iraq?
1. WMD's
2. To spread democracy
3. Because it was the central front on the war on terror
4. So the Iraqi central government could get started
5. Because Saddam was a bad man
you know the rules for posting copywritten material. follow them
None. You leftwingnuts picked and chose from the list of reasons given as it suited your intellectually dishonest accusations.
they can go read the SOTU address from 2003 and see it all
its publicly available
and it was done BEFORE OIF started
Gunny
Gold Member
LOLThose were actually the missions you, Bush and the right wing media told us we were on.
What, do you want to forget? I bet you do.
See everyone! When an asshole is proven wrong, he attacks the source. Dive has nothing else because I'm right!!!
think progress is a lying leftwing moonbat site
try again asshole
Sive, just shut the **** up. Every single one of us knows, and can post video of, the Bush cartel pushing the iraq war based on nothing more than WMDs. America wasn't interested in NATION BUILDING. Neither was Bushco until it was clear that we'd find no phantom WMDs.
Transcript for Feb. 8th
Guest: President George W. Bush
Russert: The night you took the country to war, March 17th, you said this: "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
President Bush: Right.
Russert: That apparently is not the case.
President Bush: Correct.
Russert: How do you respond to critics who say that you brought the nation to war under false pretenses?
President Bush: Yes. First of all, I expected to find the weapons. Sitting behind this desk making a very difficult decision of war and peace, and I based my decision on the best intelligence possible, intelligence that had been gathered over the years, intelligence that not only our analysts thought was valid but analysts from other countries thought were valid.
And I made a decision based upon that intelligence in the context of the war against terror. In other words, we were attacked, and therefore every threat had to be reanalyzed. Every threat had to be looked at. Every potential harm to America had to be judged in the context of this war on terror.
And I made the decision, obviously, to take our case to the international community in the hopes that we could do this achieve a disarmament of Saddam Hussein peacefully. In other words, we looked at the intelligence. And we remembered the fact that he had used weapons, which meant he had had weapons. We knew the fact that he was paying for suicide bombers. We knew the fact he was funding terrorist groups. In other words, he was a dangerous man. And that was the intelligence I was using prior to the run up to this war.
Now, let me which is this is a vital question
Russert: Nothing more important.
President Bush: Vital question.
And so we I expected there to be stockpiles of weapons. But David Kay has found the capacity to produce weapons. Now, when David Kay goes in and says we haven't found stockpiles yet, and there's theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. Saddam and his henchmen could have destroyed them as we entered into Iraq. They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and well find out. That's what the Iraqi Survey Group let me let me finish here.
But David Kay did report to the American people that Saddam had the capacity to make weapons. Saddam Hussein was dangerous with weapons. Saddam Hussein was dangerous with the ability to make weapons. He was a dangerous man in the dangerous part of the world.
And I made the decision to go to the United Nations.
By the way, quoting a lot of their data in other words, this is unaccounted for stockpiles that you thought he had because I don't think America can stand by and hope for the best from a madman, and I believe it is essential I believe it is essential that when we see a threat, we deal with those threats before they become imminent. It's too late if they become imminent. It's too late in this new kind of war, and so that's why I made the decision I made.
February 8, 2004 - Meet the Press, online at MSNBC- msnbc.com
Once Opposed, Bush Begins Nation Building
President Once Said He Wouldn't Follow Clinton's Example In Balkans
WASHINGTON -- As a candidate for the presidency in 2000, George W. Bush insisted that, if elected, he would not allow U.S. military forces to engage in "nation building."
No way would he follow President Bill Clinton's foray into nation building in the Balkans, Bush declared. Famous last words.
Once Opposed, Bush Begins Nation Building - Helen Thomas News Story - WCVB Boston
crazy *****.
Wrong. Nothing was pushed solely on the threat of WMDs. That's just how the left revised the story.
Gunny
Gold Member
Methinks YOU better shut up or produce some evidence. You're burying yourself and I have to admit, I'm enjoying watching it.
Gunny
Gold Member
Sive, just shut the **** up. Every single one of us knows, and can post video of, the Bush cartel pushing the iraq war based on nothing more than WMDs. America wasn't interested in NATION BUILDING. Neither was Bushco until it was clear that we'd find no phantom WMDs.
Transcript for Feb. 8th
Guest: President George W. Bush
Russert: The night you took the country to war, March 17th, you said this: "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
President Bush: Right.
Russert: That apparently is not the case.
President Bush: Correct.
Russert: How do you respond to critics who say that you brought the nation to war under false pretenses?
President Bush: Yes. First of all, I expected to find the weapons. Sitting behind this desk making a very difficult decision of war and peace, and I based my decision on the best intelligence possible, intelligence that had been gathered over the years, intelligence that not only our analysts thought was valid but analysts from other countries thought were valid.
And I made a decision based upon that intelligence in the context of the war against terror. In other words, we were attacked, and therefore every threat had to be reanalyzed. Every threat had to be looked at. Every potential harm to America had to be judged in the context of this war on terror.
And I made the decision, obviously, to take our case to the international community in the hopes that we could do this achieve a disarmament of Saddam Hussein peacefully. In other words, we looked at the intelligence. And we remembered the fact that he had used weapons, which meant he had had weapons. We knew the fact that he was paying for suicide bombers. We knew the fact he was funding terrorist groups. In other words, he was a dangerous man. And that was the intelligence I was using prior to the run up to this war.
Now, let me which is this is a vital question
Russert: Nothing more important.
President Bush: Vital question.
And so we I expected there to be stockpiles of weapons. But David Kay has found the capacity to produce weapons. Now, when David Kay goes in and says we haven't found stockpiles yet, and there's theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. Saddam and his henchmen could have destroyed them as we entered into Iraq. They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and well find out. That's what the Iraqi Survey Group let me let me finish here.
But David Kay did report to the American people that Saddam had the capacity to make weapons. Saddam Hussein was dangerous with weapons. Saddam Hussein was dangerous with the ability to make weapons. He was a dangerous man in the dangerous part of the world.
And I made the decision to go to the United Nations.
By the way, quoting a lot of their data in other words, this is unaccounted for stockpiles that you thought he had because I don't think America can stand by and hope for the best from a madman, and I believe it is essential I believe it is essential that when we see a threat, we deal with those threats before they become imminent. It's too late if they become imminent. It's too late in this new kind of war, and so that's why I made the decision I made.
February 8, 2004 - Meet the Press, online at MSNBC- msnbc.com
Once Opposed, Bush Begins Nation Building
President Once Said He Wouldn't Follow Clinton's Example In Balkans
WASHINGTON -- As a candidate for the presidency in 2000, George W. Bush insisted that, if elected, he would not allow U.S. military forces to engage in "nation building."
No way would he follow President Bill Clinton's foray into nation building in the Balkans, Bush declared. Famous last words.
Once Opposed, Bush Begins Nation Building - Helen Thomas News Story - WCVB Boston
crazy *****.
Wrong. Nothing was pushed solely on the threat of WMDs. That's just how the left revised the story.
You're a crazy ***** too.
I don't remember what year the GOP had a House Ways & Means committee meeting to solve the problem of jobs going overseas, but I do remember when the meeting was over, they ended up giving the companies even more tax breaks for going overseas.
I'm assuming because all their corporate buddies were going to be moving their hq's overseas that that is why they ended up giving even more tax breaks for companies leaving America for greener pastures.
Any other possible reasons you can think of Bunny?
It was 2003 I believe. And I know the only place talking about it was NPR. But no, I don't remember all the facts verbatum.
But I do remember right wingers like you arguing with me. And now it is so ******* obvious that the GOP were hell bent on sending jobs overseas. And not just union jobs. Haloburton isn't a union and yet they moved their HQ to Dubai.
What a joke you are Bunny. Sellout. And you think you are very patriotic. And I believe you probably are. You're just dumb.
You're like the dumb grunt marine. He may be tough and he may love America, but bright he is not. Neither are you.
Xenophon
Gone and forgotten
Last edited:
Xenophon
Gone and forgotten
There, fixed it for you.
Article 15
Dr. House slayer
- Jul 4, 2008
- 24,673
- 4,917
- 183
I don't remember what year the GOP had a House Ways & Means committee meeting to solve the problem of jobs going overseas, but I do remember when the meeting was over, they ended up giving the companies even more tax breaks for going overseas.
I'm assuming because all their corporate buddies were going to be moving their hq's overseas that that is why they ended up giving even more tax breaks for companies leaving America for greener pastures.
Any other possible reasons you can think of Bunny?
It was 2003 I believe. And I know the only place talking about it was NPR. But no, I don't remember all the facts verbatum.
But I do remember right wingers like you arguing with me. And now it is so ******* obvious that the GOP were hell bent on sending jobs overseas. And not just union jobs. Haloburton isn't a union and yet they moved their HQ to Dubai.
What a joke you are Bunny. Sellout. And you think you are very patriotic. And I believe you probably are. You're just dumb.
You're like the dumb grunt marine. He may be tough and he may love America, but bright he is not. Neither are you.
Why do you feel the need to attack the military?
You can get your point across without doing so.
and what the **** does that have to do with the topic of this thread?
I don't remember what year the GOP had a House Ways & Means committee meeting to solve the problem of jobs going overseas, but I do remember when the meeting was over, they ended up giving the companies even more tax breaks for going overseas.
I'm assuming because all their corporate buddies were going to be moving their hq's overseas that that is why they ended up giving even more tax breaks for companies leaving America for greener pastures.
Any other possible reasons you can think of Bunny?
It was 2003 I believe. And I know the only place talking about it was NPR. But no, I don't remember all the facts verbatum.
But I do remember right wingers like you arguing with me. And now it is so ******* obvious that the GOP were hell bent on sending jobs overseas. And not just union jobs. Haloburton isn't a union and yet they moved their HQ to Dubai.
What a joke you are Bunny. Sellout. And you think you are very patriotic. And I believe you probably are. You're just dumb.
You're like the dumb grunt marine. He may be tough and he may love America, but bright he is not. Neither are you.
not a damn thing
Us liberals don't care about Nanci Pelosi. **** her! Replace her! Throw her under he bus.
I don't like the Democratic Elders like Clinton, Pelosi, Reed. They are in some ways just as bad and corrupt as the GOP.
Nancy didn't even want Obama. She wanted Hillary.
This isn't like when the GOP tried to hush it up that right before the 2006 midterm, one of your anti gay right wingers Mark Foley was trying to **** underage male Pages. Remember Hastert (your leader at the time) was trying cover it up?
And even then you guys tried to change the subject and you started asking, "how much did Nancy Pelosi know"? "Are the dems playing politics by coming forward right before the election?".
You guys are a ******* pip.
One of yours rapes a minor, and the dems have to share the blame. You lie us into war, and the dems are to blame. You ruin the economy, and the dems are to blame.
What a ******* HOOT!!!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
A solution to the growing number of unemployable Americans
- Started by GuyOnInternet
- Replies: 2
-
-
