Pelosi Refuses a Floor Vote for Unanimous Senate Bill to Protect Justices and Their Families

[excalibur]

The same that she did when she refused the National Guard prior to January 6, and refused other offers of beefed-up protection prior to January 6.

She's now refusing to allow a floor vote on a bill that unanimously passed the Senate to offer greater protection for Supreme Court Justices.

...
But House speaker Nancy Pelosi still hasn’t brought the bill up for a vote, and the House isn’t scheduled to hold floor votes again until June 7.

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate who has called protests outside the justices’ homes “reprehensible,” told CNN on Thursday that he’s “very much” concerned that Pelosi has chosen not to hold a vote on the Senate-passed bill:




The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

Top Senate Dem ‘Very Much’ Concerned Pelosi Hasn’t Passed Bill to Protect Families of Supreme Court Justices | National Review

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill passed to protect SCOTUS justices and their families is preposterous.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[rightnow909]

after baby killing and how it is always promoted, almost to the exclusion of all else... nothing surprises us about elite dims

the only thing that surprises me is

some everyday Americans actually vote for them... !

Go figure...

can't figure... unfathomable.. Oh wait.. not when you think about how a lot of people just... they can't help it... they just weren't blessed w/ even an avg IQ

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

The same that she did when she refused the National Guard prior to January 6, and refused other offers of beefed-up protection prior to January 6.

She's now refusing to allow a floor vote on a bill that unanimously passed the Senate to offer greater protection for Supreme Court Justices.

...​

But House speaker Nancy Pelosi still hasn’t brought the bill up for a vote, and the House isn’t scheduled to hold floor votes again until June 7.​

​

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate who has called protests outside the justices’ homes “reprehensible,” told CNN on Thursday that he’s “very much” concerned that Pelosi has chosen not to hold a vote on the Senate-passed bill: ​

​

​

​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

Top Senate Dem ‘Very Much’ Concerned Pelosi Hasn’t Passed Bill to Protect Families of Supreme Court Justices | National Review

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill passed to protect SCOTUS justices and their families is preposterous.

www.nationalreview.com

Excellent. I hope she regrets this so much. Nightmares haunt her for what will happen

 

[22lcidw]

after baby killing and how it is always promoted, almost to the exclusion of all else... nothing surprises us about elite dims

the only thing that surprises me is

some everyday Americans actually vote for them... !

Go figure...

can't figure... unfathomable.. Oh wait.. not when you think about how a lot of people just... they can't help it... they just weren't blessed w/ even an avg IQ

A little over five months until the election and the dead time between the election and the swearing in. A lot of damage can be done with these vindictive spiteful spoiled tyrants until then.

 

[White 6]

The question is not "Does she support protection for the Supreme Court Justices and their families?". The question is what kind of pork is she wanting in the freaking bill.
I followed the link to the article, and the sub-links. I found it talking about a $10,000,000 dollar appropriation. Nancy says she wants to make sure there is what is necessary to protect the families as well as the clerks and others. If they are talking an additional $10 Million Dollars a year for the 9 justices and immediate family, we're getting ripped off again. That is over a million per justice and they already have some protection now. That is a hell of a lot of salaries for body guards for those 9 guys and families. They ought to make them all move to Virginia (a stand your ground state), get licensed to carry and be somewhat responsible themselves. There is no telling with Nancy will add to it, her theory being nothing but the best when somebody else pays the tab, and it is always good to spend money.

 

[eagle7-31]

The same that she did when she refused the National Guard prior to January 6, and refused other offers of beefed-up protection prior to January 6.

She's now refusing to allow a floor vote on a bill that unanimously passed the Senate to offer greater protection for Supreme Court Justices.

...​

But House speaker Nancy Pelosi still hasn’t brought the bill up for a vote, and the House isn’t scheduled to hold floor votes again until June 7.​

​

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate who has called protests outside the justices’ homes “reprehensible,” told CNN on Thursday that he’s “very much” concerned that Pelosi has chosen not to hold a vote on the Senate-passed bill: ​

​

​

​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

Top Senate Dem ‘Very Much’ Concerned Pelosi Hasn’t Passed Bill to Protect Families of Supreme Court Justices | National Review

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill passed to protect SCOTUS justices and their families is preposterous.

www.nationalreview.com

She wants her designer ice cream and hair dressing to go in the bill as well.

 

[struth]

this is nancy green lighting the dembot brownshirts continued assault on the courts

 

[JusticeHammer]

Pelosi is a stupid witch.

 

[Turtlesoup]

The same that she did when she refused the National Guard prior to January 6, and refused other offers of beefed-up protection prior to January 6.

She's now refusing to allow a floor vote on a bill that unanimously passed the Senate to offer greater protection for Supreme Court Justices.

...​

But House speaker Nancy Pelosi still hasn’t brought the bill up for a vote, and the House isn’t scheduled to hold floor votes again until June 7.​

​

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate who has called protests outside the justices’ homes “reprehensible,” told CNN on Thursday that he’s “very much” concerned that Pelosi has chosen not to hold a vote on the Senate-passed bill: ​

​

​

​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

​

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill — that they want to add funding for clerks and staff — is preposterous. It doesn’t take long to write a few lines of legislative text, and Pelosi had plenty of time to hold meaningless show votes this week.​

​

A much more plausible reason why House Democrats are dragging their feet is that they are responding to progressive activists who expressed frustration when the Senate unanimously passed the bill to protect the Supreme Court justices’ families on May 9.​

Top Senate Dem ‘Very Much’ Concerned Pelosi Hasn’t Passed Bill to Protect Families of Supreme Court Justices | National Review

The House Democrats’ stated reason for holding up the bill passed to protect SCOTUS justices and their families is preposterous.

www.nationalreview.com

She too needs to be impeached and put up on criminal charges.

 

[rightnow909]

A little over five months until the election and the dead time between the election and the swearing in. A lot of damage can be done with these vindictive spiteful spoiled tyrants until then.

hey, i was having a reasonably good day.. you had to remind me...

anyway... I wish there was something I could do, but I am limited... That's what the left want all the little People tobe... limited...

 

[rightnow909]

Pelosi is a stupid witch.

she is certainly incredibly UNWISE

her bishop said she cannot receive Communion. i frankly think he should have done that YEARS ago... not sure how long he has been her bishop... but in any case, this particular bishop is doing what the Catholic Church is supposed to do... Francis is... mixed bag... Sometimes he says wise things, sometimes... far from it..

oh well... just another thing I can't do anything about... except whine

 

[wamose]

Our capitol building smells of old people almost as much as our rest homes and a lot of that smell is coming from Pelosi.