martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,990
- 44,284
- 2,300
In a word
GOOD!
In my opinion ALL pedophiles should be put into general population....and what they are in for broadcasted to the rest of the inmates.....
That sentence works for me.
Technically he would be considered a pederast, as his interest is in pubescent or post pubescent girls. Pedophiles if you go by the strict definition are interested only in pre pubescents.
In any event he is still a sick fuck and will appropriately rot in jail. I just have an issue calling this pedophilia, which it is technically not.
baby raper any way you put it.
Not historically. In the past marriages between girls as young as 12 and men older than 30 were perfectly acceptable, and even encouraged. You saw this up to the 1700's or early 1800's usually among royalty, and sometimes between uncle's and nieces.
Never, in history, however, has pre-pubescent-adult relationships been condoned. They have been taboo in all cultures.
Our society has decided to include pederasty in its legal taboo, and in the context of our society it is the right thing to do, but there is a pyschological difference between true pedophilia and pederasty.