freedombecki
Let's go swimmin'!
- Thread starter
- #21
Thanks for telling me, tinydancer. I didn't know that. Maybe they have a bad habit of omitting whatever they feel like omitting over there. When I looked up the Civil Rights Act of 1957, what the inscription said, and what was in their first 10 paragraphs did not jive, and I could not find the word "Republican" yesterday. I was just making a case. I wonder if our board's Democrats are having the same problem. I really was being one-sided yesterday.Yesterday, I was answering a person's post who seemed to think none of us could find anything about Republicans feeling helpful toward underprivileged people. I thought to myself, "Doesn't he know that the Republican Party was created in 1854 by anti-slavery activists?"
So I went online and placed "Republican Civil Rights" into my regular search engine. The first couple of posts were by Wikipedia, and they contained the words, "Republican" and "Civil Rights"
When I got to Wikipedia, the term "Civil Rights" was there all right, but the word, "Republican" had been omitted.
I thought to myself, "That's strange. I know I read "Republican" and "Civil Rights", I am making a case to defend our participation in Civil Rights, our party placed the Illinois backwoods lawyer, President Abraham Lincoln into the White House, and immediately, the Southern States, who were Democrats, were so mad that Democrats declared that they were seceding from the Union, and the Civil War within our country, sadly, started with a bang at Fort Sumpter near Charleston, South Carolina on April 12-13, 1861, and it went on for four more years costing 618,000 American lives.
Surely it's a fluke, I told myself. Then I went back and started touching all the pullups that had the words, "Republican" and "Civil Rights." In the first 10 websites I opened, it was the same song and dance. Someone was getting in there and removing the word "Republicans."
I was horrified. Then I did what I had to do, with no "general encyclopedic" sites showing that the Republicans had freed the slaves by allowing a civil war to start, this would allow others to tell lies about us, because in lawyer speak land, what you cannot prove with links to general information does not exist.
I know hundreds of thousands of people up north died because Lincoln and his Republican Party insisted on freeing people bound to slavery for over 200 years. The first slaves had been brought to America in 1619, I knew, from reading Mr. Schlesinger's book that was an Almanac of American History. (It's a wonderful book, by the way.)
Well, why did I call this thread a War on the USA, then?
Because, if someone is excising the truth about Republicans, they will soon be messing with the contributions of Democrats, too.
Has anything like this ever happened to you? After 3 or 4 hours I finally had my post completed.
There's no excuse for taking out the Republican contribution to America to "prove" a political case for whoever decided to decimate Republican contributions. I found my info at Republican-safe sites.
Is there a way we can fix this problem before people panic about online resources? Panic is not a nice thing in America. It causes nothing but trouble.
What do you think we should do to restore the truth back at Wikipedia and the three or four other American History websites online?
I truly want to know.
Wait till you see what wiki had to to do over their science division over all the lying mother truckers that were on board over global warming.
Head honcho finally had to resign after we rocked his soul. It's a bullshit site.