Parents angered over graphic sex ed in 7th grade science class

[DrLove]

I'll take that as an admission that you DO know people are trying to avoid you, and you still think you need to interfere in their lives.

I attract pretty much everyone other than people such as you.

FYI, restraining orders are not love letters. Just sayin' . . .

Meanwhile, parents do not enroll their children in non-public schools because they think the various leftist educational agendas are awesome.

I wouldn't know having never received a restraining order. Perhaps you have.

I think it's just fine if QUALIFIED parents home school their children or put them in private schools if they can afford it.

But you talk about public education as if it was part of the "Criminal Deep State".

Don't worry - nobody is coming to get you.

 

[DrLove]

The friction of using your own hand or some other aid to achieve masturbation may also condition you to that level of stimulation. Believe it or not, this kind of conditioning may make it less likely that you will be stimulated by vaginal intercourse. Men who get into this kind of pattern may start experiencing sexual frustrations when they are being sexual with their wives.

Masturbation: The Secret That Ruins Great Sex | Growthtrac Marriage

There is clearly no limit to your level of STOOPID

Actually, it's been a known fact in the medical and psychological communities for a while now that masturbation can end up being a serious hindrance to normal sexual relations. You should really try to keep up.

Not only that......but you will go blind

Hairy palms too

 

[Lysistrata]

How can anyone take this article seriously when its author refers to Planned Parenthood as an "abortion conglomerate" and we know that there is a movement out there to push on girls the double standard by which they have to "behave" sexually while the males do whatever they want, sexually speaking, and then seek to "marry" females who have no sexual experience?
We don't know how many of these complaining parents believe in this trashy nonsense and seek to dump it on their daughters. This double standard always has to be a factor in the "sniff test" in judging what youth are taught about sex. Girls get it from two sides, both the sleaze balls who push this "moral" crap aimed at satisfying male sexual desires and the males who have no "morals" and will do anything with their own bodies that they can get. Our girls need to be given protection from both sides so that they can make their own choices, whether they decide yes or no as to any man. It can be "no, I don't want to." or it can be "yes, I approve and accept your advances." Education is intended to give them this choice based on reason.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I shudder to even think about what the curriculum actually was to produce that.

But the teacher strayed from it.....

Pretty sure that's what the parents are complaining about.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The kids already know about oral sex by the 7th grade. With the internet chances are most of them have seen it before. Some parents are so in the dark, then act surprised when their kid gets knocked up.

Thank you for oversexualizing our children with this permissive assumption.

For the record, most adults actually know far less about sex than they think they do, and children generally know far less than adults attribute to them, and also are less interested than adults project onto them.

Also, I would be curious to know how you think this little addition to the curriculum could POSSIBLY aid in preventing sexual activity and pregnancy. What, precisely, is the "good" you're seeing in this?

 

[Cecilie1200]

without me traipsing through all of this mess, just WHAT was said in this class that some people are complaining about? Specifically, just WHAT was so big and bad? Be specific about this, particularly those of you are protesting. Specifically what are you complaining about? The complainers have an ability to type here, no?

I believe the primary source of protest is that the "teacher" instructed the students to look up images of oral sex on the Internet, and specifically told them not to use the school's computer, because it could be tracked.

So basically, graphic discussion of oral sex, followed by an instruction to look up pornographic and inappropriate pictures.

 

[Cecilie1200]

What was actually said? What do the kids already know? None of these "parents complained" incidents ever include what was actually said. An, which parents? How many parents?

What's it to you what "the kids already know"? What on Earth does that have to do with what is and isn't appropriate in school?

Oh, and the news stories don't include the words because you can't say shit like that in a newspaper, which ought to tell you something right there.

 

[Lysistrata]

What was actually said? What do the kids already know? None of these "parents complained" incidents ever include what was actually said. An, which parents? How many parents?

What's it to you what "the kids already know"? What on Earth does that have to do with what is and isn't appropriate in school?

Oh, and the news stories don't include the words because you can't say shit like that in a newspaper, which ought to tell you something right there.

From what is it that you are hiding? You seem to not want kids to be given the knowledge that might empower them to say "yes," or to say "no."

You also did not address my question in #103 as to the double standard between "acceptable" behavior among males as opposed to that of females.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It's not hard to remain oblivious to "the good Planned Parenthood does for women", given that it's all bullshit and lies. And unless you're a woman yourself - which I don't believe you are, although I hardly keep track of such things - I don't really need some asshole man explaining to me what women need and don't need, thank you so very much.

Although I'm sure most women you encounter ALSO consider your advent in their lives to be unwelcome, I'm talking about interfering in the lives of PARENTS who are quite clearly trying to raise their children without leftist bullshit, hence the not-a-public-school thing.

I don't know any women who don't support Planned Parenthood so no - This is a first for me.

Do you live in a rabbit hole in the middle of Bumfuck, Egypt?

New Kaiser Poll Shows 75% of Americans Support Federal Funding for Planned Parenthood

Do YOU? YOU'RE the one stating that you don't know a single female who isn't a supporter of Planned Parenthood, as though it never occurred to you that anything might be odd about that. ONE of us is living in a rabbit hole, and my money's on the dingbat who never speaks to or becomes acquainted with anyone who doesn't share his viewpoint.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'll take that as an admission that you DO know people are trying to avoid you, and you still think you need to interfere in their lives.

I attract pretty much everyone other than people such as you.

FYI, restraining orders are not love letters. Just sayin' . . .

Meanwhile, parents do not enroll their children in non-public schools because they think the various leftist educational agendas are awesome.

I wouldn't know having never received a restraining order. Perhaps you have.

I think it's just fine if QUALIFIED parents home school their children or put them in private schools if they can afford it.

But you talk about public education as if it was part of the "Criminal Deep State".

Don't worry - nobody is coming to get you.

And I'm sure you also think it's fine for you and your ilk, despite not even knowing the children's names or birthdates, to set yourselves up as the arbiters to whom the parents should prove themselves "qualified". After all, you wouldn't recognize those kids if they fell on you, but you OBVIOUSLY care more about them and know more about what's best for them than those silly parents, who just gave birth to them and raised them every day of their lives, right?

I talk about public education as though it's a broken, inefficient system that trash like you have corrupted so badly that people are fleeing it in droves. And I do that because it's true.

Don't worry, I don't believe any of your other lies, so I won't believe this one, either.

 

[DrLove]

And I'm sure you also think it's fine for you and your ilk, despite not even knowing the children's names or birthdates, to set yourselves up as the arbiters to whom the parents should prove themselves "qualified". After all, you wouldn't recognize those kids if they fell on you, but you OBVIOUSLY care more about them and know more about what's best for them than those silly parents, who just gave birth to them and raised them every day of their lives, right?

I talk about public education as though it's a broken, inefficient system that trash like you have corrupted so badly that people are fleeing it in droves. And I do that because it's true.

Don't worry, I don't believe any of your other lies, so I won't believe this one, either.

At some point you will go away and stop biting my ankle.

Soon?

 

[Cecilie1200]

How can anyone take this article seriously when its author refers to Planned Parenthood as an "abortion conglomerate" and we know that there is a movement out there to push on girls the double standard by which they have to "behave" sexually while the males do whatever they want, sexually speaking, and then seek to "marry" females who have no sexual experience?
We don't know how many of these complaining parents believe in this trashy nonsense and seek to dump it on their daughters. This double standard always has to be a factor in the "sniff test" in judging what youth are taught about sex. Girls get it from two sides, both the sleaze balls who push this "moral" crap aimed at satisfying male sexual desires and the males who have no "morals" and will do anything with their own bodies that they can get. Our girls need to be given protection from both sides so that they can make their own choices, whether they decide yes or no as to any man. It can be "no, I don't want to." or it can be "yes, I approve and accept your advances." Education is intended to give them this choice based on reason.

"How can anyone take this article seriously, when it refuses to parrot the party line we have VERY CLEARLY told everyone to use?"

If you have any proof that the article isn't true and that the incident never happened - beyond the fact that it isn't as flattering to Planned Parenthood as you think it should be - please produce it. Pass THAT sniff test, and then maybe we'll waste time hearing what you have to say about believability and "nonsense". In the meantime, THEY are the parents, and you aren't, so we won't be accepting your version of "trash" and "dumping it on their daughters".

Furthermore, they are not "our" girls. You didn't birth any of them, Chuckles. You know nothing about them. So you're cordially invited to stop dealing yourself into the parental decisions, and dictating that they need to be "protected" against their parents DARING to teach them things that you, the utter stranger who is nevertheless MUCH more knowledgeable and concerned, have summarily decided is wrong. (Which is exactly what you were bitching about in regards to the story, if I recall correctly.)

 

[DrLove]

Do YOU? YOU'RE the one stating that you don't know a single female who isn't a supporter of Planned Parenthood, as though it never occurred to you that anything might be odd about that. ONE of us is living in a rabbit hole, and my money's on the dingbat who never speaks to or becomes acquainted with anyone who doesn't share his viewpoint.

Plenty of people don't share my viewpoint that I get along with just fine. My best friend is a Trumpling in fact.

You - I would not care to know.

 

[rightwinger]

The friction of using your own hand or some other aid to achieve masturbation may also condition you to that level of stimulation. Believe it or not, this kind of conditioning may make it less likely that you will be stimulated by vaginal intercourse. Men who get into this kind of pattern may start experiencing sexual frustrations when they are being sexual with their wives.

Masturbation: The Secret That Ruins Great Sex | Growthtrac Marriage

There is clearly no limit to your level of STOOPID

Actually, it's been a known fact in the medical and psychological communities for a while now that masturbation can end up being a serious hindrance to normal sexual relations. You should really try to keep up.

Not only that......but you will go blind

Hairy palms too

I wondered why I was constantly shaving them

 

[rightwinger]

What was actually said? What do the kids already know? None of these "parents complained" incidents ever include what was actually said. An, which parents? How many parents?

What's it to you what "the kids already know"? What on Earth does that have to do with what is and isn't appropriate in school?

Oh, and the news stories don't include the words because you can't say shit like that in a newspaper, which ought to tell you something right there.

The question is.......
Is it appropriate to discuss oral sex in a sex education class?

I would say yes

 

[DrLove]

The friction of using your own hand or some other aid to achieve masturbation may also condition you to that level of stimulation. Believe it or not, this kind of conditioning may make it less likely that you will be stimulated by vaginal intercourse. Men who get into this kind of pattern may start experiencing sexual frustrations when they are being sexual with their wives.

Masturbation: The Secret That Ruins Great Sex | Growthtrac Marriage

There is clearly no limit to your level of STOOPID

Actually, it's been a known fact in the medical and psychological communities for a while now that masturbation can end up being a serious hindrance to normal sexual relations. You should really try to keep up.

Not only that......but you will go blind

Hairy palms too

I wondered why I was constantly shaving them

Something Cecilie would probably say:

 

[Cecilie1200]

What was actually said? What do the kids already know? None of these "parents complained" incidents ever include what was actually said. An, which parents? How many parents?

What's it to you what "the kids already know"? What on Earth does that have to do with what is and isn't appropriate in school?

Oh, and the news stories don't include the words because you can't say shit like that in a newspaper, which ought to tell you something right there.

From what is it that you are hiding? You seem to not want kids to be given the knowledge that might empower them to say "yes," or to say "no."

You also did not address my question in #103 as to the double standard between "acceptable" behavior among males as opposed to that of females.

Hiding? You may consider "there are bad things in the world, therefore I must immerse myself in them without reservation" to be a good life plan, but you should consider that no one is looking at you and saying, "Gosh, that's what I want MY daughter to be like", so that should tell you something.

And yes, I DID address your question. You just didn't like the answer. Here it is again: None. Of. Your. Business.

 

[Cecilie1200]

And I'm sure you also think it's fine for you and your ilk, despite not even knowing the children's names or birthdates, to set yourselves up as the arbiters to whom the parents should prove themselves "qualified". After all, you wouldn't recognize those kids if they fell on you, but you OBVIOUSLY care more about them and know more about what's best for them than those silly parents, who just gave birth to them and raised them every day of their lives, right?

I talk about public education as though it's a broken, inefficient system that trash like you have corrupted so badly that people are fleeing it in droves. And I do that because it's true.

Don't worry, I don't believe any of your other lies, so I won't believe this one, either.

At some point you will go away and stop biting my ankle.

Soon?

Nice try, ass napkin, but you're never going to get lucky enough to spew your bullshit unhindered and unresponded-to. If you don't like it, I guess you're just going to have to shut your hole, arentcha?

 

[DrLove]

Nice try, ass napkin, but you're never going to get lucky enough to spew your bullshit unhindered and unresponded-to. If you don't like it, I guess you're just going to have to shut your hole, arentcha?

Nah - I'm just kidding. Cave Dwelling Prepper Nutbars such as yourself amuse the hell out of me.

 

[Lysistrata]

How can anyone take this article seriously when its author refers to Planned Parenthood as an "abortion conglomerate" and we know that there is a movement out there to push on girls the double standard by which they have to "behave" sexually while the males do whatever they want, sexually speaking, and then seek to "marry" females who have no sexual experience?
We don't know how many of these complaining parents believe in this trashy nonsense and seek to dump it on their daughters. This double standard always has to be a factor in the "sniff test" in judging what youth are taught about sex. Girls get it from two sides, both the sleaze balls who push this "moral" crap aimed at satisfying male sexual desires and the males who have no "morals" and will do anything with their own bodies that they can get. Our girls need to be given protection from both sides so that they can make their own choices, whether they decide yes or no as to any man. It can be "no, I don't want to." or it can be "yes, I approve and accept your advances." Education is intended to give them this choice based on reason.

"How can anyone take this article seriously, when it refuses to parrot the party line we have VERY CLEARLY told everyone to use?"

If you have any proof that the article isn't true and that the incident never happened - beyond the fact that it isn't as flattering to Planned Parenthood as you think it should be - please produce it. Pass THAT sniff test, and then maybe we'll waste time hearing what you have to say about believability and "nonsense". In the meantime, THEY are the parents, and you aren't, so we won't be accepting your version of "trash" and "dumping it on their daughters".

Furthermore, they are not "our" girls. You didn't birth any of them, Chuckles. You know nothing about them. So you're cordially invited to stop dealing yourself into the parental decisions, and dictating that they need to be "protected" against their parents DARING to teach them things that you, the utter stranger who is nevertheless MUCH more knowledgeable and concerned, have summarily decided is wrong. (Which is exactly what you were bitching about in regards to the story, if I recall correctly.)

So you are one of those parents who keep their daughters for auction for their nether parts? A virgin girl who has been deliberately left uneducated brings a high price on some markets. How much are you selling your female children for? Ever stop to think that they are human beings who must decide whom to marry and how to get on with their lives and do what they want to do? Which men do you have in mind to penetrate your daughters' bodies without giving them their fair choice? All I said was about having each girl having a choice, yes or no. You sex traffic types are another lot.