Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would give up too, since you have nothing to back up your statements.
Politicans love to get everyone all riled up about pork and earmarks. That means nothing. $30 billion out of a $3.8 trillion budget. Take out defense, homeland security, and veterans spending and you are left with a whopping $550 billion left in discretionary spending. That is not where the problem lies.
Since the tax cuts are the problem with the projected deficits we should probably push to make sure the tax cuts do not take place.
Politicans love to get everyone all riled up about pork and earmarks. That means nothing. $30 billion out of a $3.8 trillion budget. Take out defense, homeland security, and veterans spending and you are left with a whopping $550 billion left in discretionary spending. That is not where the problem lies.
Since the tax cuts are the problem with the projected deficits we should probably push to make sure the tax cuts do not take place.
Nah.... can't be unconstitutional entitlement spending or the fact that ~50% of the citizens pay no income tax at all... nah... can't be wasteful spending and a power hungry government that only looks to expand can't be
I would give up too, since you have nothing to back up your statements.
It's just so obvious...OK, one time.
Let's say that the total value of all assets is $10 Trillion and the tax rate is 50%, that means that the net after tax value, the value entrepreneurs and businesses have to work with is $5 Trillion. If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
See what happens? More value, more stuff to play with?
If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
Politicans love to get everyone all riled up about pork and earmarks. That means nothing. $30 billion out of a $3.8 trillion budget. Take out defense, homeland security, and veterans spending and you are left with a whopping $550 billion left in discretionary spending. That is not where the problem lies.
Since the tax cuts are the problem with the projected deficits we should probably push to make sure the tax cuts do not take place.
Nah.... can't be unconstitutional entitlement spending or the fact that ~50% of the citizens pay no income tax at all... nah... can't be wasteful spending and a power hungry government that only looks to expand can't be
If it is unconstitutional, why not take it to court and be done with it?
I would give up too, since you have nothing to back up your statements.
It's just so obvious...OK, one time.
Let's say that the total value of all assets is $10 Trillion and the tax rate is 50%, that means that the net after tax value, the value entrepreneurs and businesses have to work with is $5 Trillion. If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
See what happens? More value, more stuff to play with?
Oy vey. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
What is the economy? 2/3rds of the government is direct payments to first purchasers. That goes directly into the economy. All of the government spending, save interest payments, goes right back into the economy, whether it be Medicare, Nasa, or whatever.
If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
The money is still the same. We are talking about a shift. There is nothing new created. No benefit.
I would give up too, since you have nothing to back up your statements.
It's just so obvious...OK, one time.
Let's say that the total value of all assets is $10 Trillion and the tax rate is 50%, that means that the net after tax value, the value entrepreneurs and businesses have to work with is $5 Trillion. If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
See what happens? More value, more stuff to play with?
Oy vey. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
What is the economy? 2/3rds of the government is direct payments to first purchasers. That goes directly into the economy. All of the government spending, save interest payments, goes right back into the economy, whether it be Medicare, Nasa, or whatever.
If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
The money is still the same. We are talking about a shift. There is nothing new created. No benefit.
It's just so obvious...OK, one time.
Let's say that the total value of all assets is $10 Trillion and the tax rate is 50%, that means that the net after tax value, the value entrepreneurs and businesses have to work with is $5 Trillion. If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
See what happens? More value, more stuff to play with?
Oy vey. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
What is the economy? 2/3rds of the government is direct payments to first purchasers. That goes directly into the economy. All of the government spending, save interest payments, goes right back into the economy, whether it be Medicare, Nasa, or whatever.
If taxes are cut to 25%, then the net after tax value is $7.5Trillion.
The money is still the same. We are talking about a shift. There is nothing new created. No benefit.
What did I say? A total waste of time.
Repeat after me:
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
The Federal Government is NOT the US economy
Right, because the government spending too much money isn't the real problem
Right, because the government spending too much money isn't the real problem
and Bush increased spending by 83% per year compared to just 32% for Clinton, and gave "conservative" policies like Medicare Drug, No Child Left Behind, and AIDS for Africa funding
GOP needs stfu about spending