Pam Bondi for Attorney General

Morals aside, though that was the point of the ethics thing, he has a law degree, but never practiced law, was being considered for actually running a department of Justice, over the FBI, US Marshall Service, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives as well as Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Prison, with a million square foot headquarters, 8 divisions of litigation for the US Government (Criminal, Civil, Antitrust, Tax, Civil Rights, Environment and Natural Resources, National Security, Justice Management) incluges all US Attorneys offices in 94 judicial district. It has over 115,000 employees and a budget of around $67 Billion, and doing it will little multi-office, much less multi-department experience, and never having a paid staff greater than 20. Sorry. Totally out of his class.

Bandi was always the pick, from the beginning, and a much more experienced choice, to carry out whatever the President-Elect needs or wants done.
Did you assess Garland that same way?
 
As was suggested...........Trump is playing chess why his enemies are playing checkers. 47 used this first pick as a decoy.......to see who the players are instead of being stabbed in the back for the first 2 years of his term like was the case with 45. Does anyone really believe these same players will reject 47's real choice as AG, who is both a female and a conservative legal genesis.......and most importantly a Lawyer that kept 47 out of prison over the past 4 years of LAWFARE? She not only knows the players up close and personal.....but now she will have the authority to indict them. They had their turn at offense.......now its they who will be on the defensive side of the ball while 47 marches toward the end zone.

You can't make this shit up.........47 played them like a cheap fiddle. They are still attempting to spike a fumbled ball. LMAO Gates is laughing all the way back to the bank and to his old congressional seat in Fla. Which will not be filled until Jan. 2025. Most importantly, having been finally cleared of these left wing false charges.......as they were forced to admit there was never any evidence that would ever lead to an indictment. I laughed my ass of when the View was forced to read a legal retraction concerning Gates under threat of law.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you (or anyone here) can shed light on why Gaetz was a better first pick than Bondi,
Why would I assume that task? I’m plenty content not having him as AG.
I wonder how she feels about being regarded as second best choice after a reprobate drug user and child abuser like Gatez, perhaps Gaetz is better at fellatio.
SO. BASICALLY YOU’RE CONCEDING THAT you have nothing of merit to offer.
 
Did you assess Garland that same way?
No. Garland had the typical resume for the position, and a hell of a lot more experience as a lawyer, litigator, judge, lecturer at Harvard Law, managing investigations such as Oklahoma City bombing, etc, so he never raised an eyebrow.
 
No. Garland had the typical resume for the position, and a hell of a lot more experience as a lawyer, litigator, judge, lecturer at Harvard Law, managing investigations such as Oklahoma City bombing, etc, so he never raised an eyebrow.
I wonder why.........the left is raising hell over Pete Hegseth, who is both a post grad from 2 Ivy league schools with a 20 years of military experience and 2 bronze stars? Can you spell double standard? Regardless.......I would say that the Gates resignation will clear the path for the rest of Trumps picks. If 47 has any success at all over the next 2 years.......these supposed republican senators and congressmen that are up for election in 22 will fall right in line or possibly put their careers on the line. There is nothing like a good defensive line.
 
Last edited:
She's just another one of subhuman Trump's human jockstraps. Another MAGA hack pissed off because criminal Trump got his ass in the bag for being a fucking lowlife gangster.

The gangster donated $25000 to human jockstrap Bondi's campaign for Florida AG right before she failed to investigate that crooked bastard's fake university.

Birds of a feather.
meanwhile, your gangster is making Defense contractors rich by giving billions to Ukraine for an unjust military action that is better handled by surrounding Nato countries. Your gangster is bringing in millions of free loaders into the country while millions of Americans are homeless and seniors cannot afford their medicine. This is driving Inflation as we have to support these people.

Pam Bondi IS A JOKE,,,,she should be on HOOTERS commercials. Feckless and Weak which is why the Deep State loves her nomination.
 
meanwhile, your gangster is making Defense contractors rich by giving billions to Ukraine for an unjust military action that is better handled by surrounding Nato countries. Your gangster is bringing in millions of free loaders into the country while millions of Americans are homeless and seniors cannot afford their medicine. This is driving Inflation as we have to support these people.

Pam Bondi IS A JOKE,,,,she should be on HOOTERS commercials. Feckless and Weak which is why the Deep State loves her nomination.
Unjust military action? Ukraine was invaded by Russia, you moron. I guess Trump must be "Deep State because HE nominated her, nitwit.
 
No. Garland had the typical resume for the position, and a hell of a lot more experience as a lawyer, litigator, judge, lecturer at Harvard Law, managing investigations such as Oklahoma City bombing, etc, so he never raised an eyebrow.
Yet Garland was impeached by Congress.
 
As was suggested...........Trump is playing chess why his enemies are playing checkers. 47 used this first pick as a decoy.......to see who the players are instead of being stabbed in the back for the first 2 years of his term like was the case with 45. Does anyone really believe these same players will reject 47's real choice as AG, who is both a female and a conservative legal genesis.......and most importantly a Lawyer that kept 47 out of prison over the past 4 years of LAWFARE? She not only knows the players up close and personal.....but now she will have the authority to indict them. They had their turn at offense.......now its they who will be on the defensive side of the ball while 47 marches toward the end zone.

You can't make this shit up.........47 played them like a cheap fiddle. They are still attempting to spike a fumbled ball. LMAO Gates is laughing all the way back to the bank and to his old congressional seat in Fla. Which will not be filled until Jan. 2025. Most importantly, having been finally cleared of these left wing false charges.......as they were forced to admit there was never any evidence that would ever lead to an indictment. I laughed my ass of when the View was forced to read a legal retraction concerning Gates under threat of law.
I wouldn't be surprised at all.
 
No. Garland had the typical resume for the position, and a hell of a lot more experience as a lawyer, litigator, judge, lecturer at Harvard Law, managing investigations such as Oklahoma City bombing, etc, so he never raised an eyebrow.
And he was a crooked bastard that broke the law when he should have been enforcing the law.

He was so corrupt that even the Turtle couldn't stomach him being on the Supreme Court.
 
No. Garland had the typical resume for the position, and a hell of a lot more experience as a lawyer, litigator, judge, lecturer at Harvard Law, managing investigations such as Oklahoma City bombing, etc, so he never raised an eyebrow.
Being prevented from going on the SC by the Republicans was a red flag.
 
I wonder why.........the left is raising hell over Pete Hegseth, who is both a post grad from 2 Ivy league schools with a 20 years of military experience and 2 bronze stars? Can you spell double standard? Regardless.......I would say that the Gates resignation will clear the path for the rest of Trumps picks. If 47 has any success at all over the next 2 years.......these supposed republican senators and congressmen that are up for election in 22 will fall right in line or possibly put their careers on the line. There is nothing like a good defensive line.
You are comparing different departments, so apples and oranges. I can tell you of the rank of Major, in the National Guard. Majors fill Battalion level staff positions, under a LT Colonel Battalion Commander. They generally do not even run Battalions (about 47 Officers and maybe 500 Soldiers) certainly not a Brigade (2-3 Battalions/ 3,000 to 5,000 Soldiers), definitely not a Division (3-5 Brigades/10,000-15,000 soldiers) or a Corps (2-5 Divisions/20,000 to 45,000 soldier). We have maybe 967,000 soldiers in the Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserves alone, not counting Navy, Air force and their reserves, all with different specialties, missions, equipment, procurement, training requirements, weaponry, equipment, etc. All assignments required specific skill sets, experience, training, based on mission, situation, organizational level, country operating in, countries operating with, whether I was commanding a unit or simply a staff Officer.

Major Hegseth may have been an excellent Platoon leader in Iraq, as a Lieutenant. He is probably a fine staff officer, in his National Guard assignment. No way in hell, I would turn the position of Secretary of Defense over the Maj Hegseth.

I
 
Last edited:
You are comparing different departments, so apples and oranges. I can tell you of the rank of Major, in the National Guard. Majors fill Battalion level staff positions, under a LT Colonel Battalion Commander. The generally do not even run Battalions (about 47 Officers and maybe 500 Soldiers) certainly not a Brigade (2-3 Battalions/ 3,000 to 5,000 Soldiers), definitely not a Division (3-5 Brigades/10,000-15,000 soldiers) or a Corps (2-5 Divisions/20,000 to 45,000 soldier). We have maybe 967,000 soldiers in the Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserves alone, not counting Navy, Air force and their reserves, all with different specialties, missions, equipment, procurement, training requirements, weaponry, equipment, etc. All assignments required specific skill sets, experience, training, based on mission, situation, organizational level, country operaiting in, countries operating with, whether I was command a unit or simply a staff Officer.

Major Hegseth may have been an excellent Platoon leader in Iraq, as a Lieutenant. He is probably a fine staff officer, in his National Guard assignment. No way in hell, I would turn the position of Secretary of Defense over the Maj Hegseth.

I
Well let's just hope Pete Hegseth doesn't just disappear for three days.
 
If he does he would let his #2 know, unlike Austin.
I suspect you are correct. He had to have learned that, by now.
 
You are comparing different departments, so apples and oranges. I can tell you of the rank of Major, in the National Guard. Majors fill Battalion level staff positions, under a LT Colonel Battalion Commander. They generally do not even run Battalions (about 47 Officers and maybe 500 Soldiers) certainly not a Brigade (2-3 Battalions/ 3,000 to 5,000 Soldiers), definitely not a Division (3-5 Brigades/10,000-15,000 soldiers) or a Corps (2-5 Divisions/20,000 to 45,000 soldier). We have maybe 967,000 soldiers in the Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserves alone, not counting Navy, Air force and their reserves, all with different specialties, missions, equipment, procurement, training requirements, weaponry, equipment, etc. All assignments required specific skill sets, experience, training, based on mission, situation, organizational level, country operating in, countries operating with, whether I was commanding a unit or simply a staff Officer.

Major Hegseth may have been an excellent Platoon leader in Iraq, as a Lieutenant. He is probably a fine staff officer, in his National Guard assignment. No way in hell, I would turn the position of Secretary of Defense over the Maj Hegseth.

I
Apples and Oranges? One excuse for a double standard is as good as another. As far as declaring that one man does not have as much intelligence as the next to delicate authority to those who do have the experience is a cock of shit. Compare Kamel Toe Harris to your logic......the left hand no problem with an under qualified individual seeking the highest office in the land......especially, a candidate that did not receive ONE PRIMARY VOTE in order run for the highest office in the land. LMAO
 
Back
Top Bottom