Palestinians will Win the War!

[pbel]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

 

[JakeStarkey]

No.
Palestinians will Win the War!

 

[Daniyel]

They'll just blow everything up, they did it before and they'll do it again.
Report: Palestinians set to nullify Oslo Accords

 

[MJB12741]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Ya gotta love Voltaire for his great sense of humor even though he most hated Roman Catholics like PBel.



“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it."

(Letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville, May 16, 1767)”

 

[MJB12741]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Ya gotta love Voltaire for his great sense of humor even though he most hated Roman Catholics like PBel.



“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it."

(Letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville, May 16, 1767)”

Athough I loved reading Candide, I cannot support Voltaire's hatred for Pbels Catholisim.

 

[pbel]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Ya gotta love Voltaire for his great sense of humor even though he most hated Roman Catholics like PBel.



“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it."

(Letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville, May 16, 1767)”

Athough I loved reading Candide, I cannot support Voltaire's hatred for Pbels Catholisim.

He didn't like Judaism either,

As self-proclaimed deist, Voltaire loathed organized religion and intolerance between creeds. Strong anti-clericalism pervades most of Voltaire's writings. He believed that all religions attempt to teach morality and that all are based on just precepts — it is only the particulars of religious beliefs that are "absurd." As a deist, he was a supporter of the "clockmaker" argument for the existence of God. Voltaire despised superstition and optimism, themes that surface in the novel Candide, his most widely-known work. Voltaire subscribed to the revolutionary Enlightenment notion that "custom is a greater decider of difference than nature," a principle that still holds for today's anthropologists and all who practice multiculturalism.

It is also worth noting that Voltaire was an infamous anti-Semite,[3] and referred to Jews as "calculating animals," "plagiarists in everything," and "the biggest tramps who have ever spoiled the face of the earth."[4] He was also a Eurocentric racist, an Islamophobe, and derided Africans as "less intelligent than apes." In A Pocket Philosophical Dictionary he denounced the Egyptians as being "contemptible" and argued that their characters were fundamentally flawed simply because he disagreed with Egyptian governmental policy regarding slavery. Jeez, Volty. Everyone today would have loved you if it wasn't for that.[5]

[edit] Famous quotes

• "Man is free at the moment he wishes to be."
• "Love truth, but pardon error."
• "To hold a pen is to be at war."
• "It is dangerous to be right in matters where established authorities are wrong."
• "A witty saying proves nothing."
• "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him."
• "Christianity is without a doubt the most ridiculous, the most absurd, and the most bloody religion that has ever infected the world."[6][7]

 

[Roudy]

If anti Semites don't have these bullshit scenarios about the imminent destruction of Israel to masturbate to, what do they really have?

 

[MJB12741]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Ya gotta love Voltaire for his great sense of humor even though he most hated Roman Catholics like PBel.



“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it."

(Letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville, May 16, 1767)”

Athough I loved reading Candide, I cannot support Voltaire's hatred for Pbels Catholisim.

He didn't like Judaism either,

As self-proclaimed deist, Voltaire loathed organized religion and intolerance between creeds. Strong anti-clericalism pervades most of Voltaire's writings. He believed that all religions attempt to teach morality and that all are based on just precepts — it is only the particulars of religious beliefs that are "absurd." As a deist, he was a supporter of the "clockmaker" argument for the existence of God. Voltaire despised superstition and optimism, themes that surface in the novel Candide, his most widely-known work. Voltaire subscribed to the revolutionary Enlightenment notion that "custom is a greater decider of difference than nature," a principle that still holds for today's anthropologists and all who practice multiculturalism.

It is also worth noting that Voltaire was an infamous anti-Semite,[3] and referred to Jews as "calculating animals," "plagiarists in everything," and "the biggest tramps who have ever spoiled the face of the earth."[4] He was also a Eurocentric racist, an Islamophobe, and derided Africans as "less intelligent than apes." In A Pocket Philosophical Dictionary he denounced the Egyptians as being "contemptible" and argued that their characters were fundamentally flawed simply because he disagreed with Egyptian governmental policy regarding slavery. Jeez, Volty. Everyone today would have loved you if it wasn't for that.[5]

[edit] Famous quotes

• 
  
  
  • "Man is free at the moment he wishes to be."
  • "Love truth, but pardon error."
  • "To hold a pen is to be at war."
  • "It is dangerous to be right in matters where established authorities are wrong."
  • "A witty saying proves nothing."
  • "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him."
  • "Christianity is without a doubt the most ridiculous, the most absurd, and the most bloody religion that has ever infected the world."[6][7]

OUTSTANDING POINT! And very true. Voltaire was also anti Jewish. Why? Because it was the Jews who were responsible for giving the wolrd something far worse --- Catholics!

 

[pbel]

If anti Semites don't have these bullshit scenarios about the imminent destruction of Israel to masturbate to, what do they really have?

If the haters of all non-Jews like you and MJ, we'd have you peeking under toilet stalls, heh as MJ would say!

 

[MJB12741]

Paragraph # 4 will explain why PBel is of evil stock according to Voltaire.


Notes on Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary

What a wonderful man Votaire is for Pbel to love.

Pargraph # 4. --- It is crucial to understand that at his time, organized religion in France (and elsewhere) ranged itself on the opposite side of every one of these issues, censoring the press and speech, opposing religious toleration, supporting the doctrine of the divine right of kings to rule and often endorsing slavery as well. Voltaire railed against the Catholic Church not because he was a wicked man who wanted freedom to sin, but because he viewed it as a fountainhead and bulwark of evil. He felt that no change of the kind he wanted was possible without undermining the power of the Church; that is why he devoted so much of his attention to ridiculing and discrediting it.

 

[Phoenall]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

 

[fanger]

They'll just blow everything up, they did it before and they'll do it again.
Report: Palestinians set to nullify Oslo Accords

Palestinians lived in peace before the zionist's took over their country by immigrants, such as your self, Daniyel from Morocco

 

[fanger]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

Well the illegal immigrants to Palestine forced the Arab population to abandon and give up their lands to the illegal jewish immigrants

 

[Hollie]

They'll just blow everything up, they did it before and they'll do it again.
Report: Palestinians set to nullify Oslo Accords

Palestinians lived in peace before the zionist's took over their country by immigrants, such as your self, Daniyel from Morocco

As usual, you don't know what you're talking about or you're clueless, or both.

Do yourself a favor and do a search for some history of the Druze revolt In 1834 which was preceded by the 1838 Arab peasant revolt. You will find that your Islamo-homies had various differences of opinion that resulted in dead Islamos. While you're doing that homework assignment, search for what you can find regarding the Ottoman Turk Crusade around those parts.

 

[Hollie]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

Well the illegal immigrants to Palestine forced the Arab population to abandon and give up their lands to the illegal jewish immigrants

The illegal immigrants in Palestine were the Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese arab beggars and squatters.

 

[MJB12741]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

Well the illegal immigrants to Palestine forced the Arab population to abandon and give up their lands to the illegal jewish immigrants

The illegal immigrants in Palestine were the Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese arab beggars and squatters.

Yes but those Zionists in Israel are guilty of allowing the squatters to remain instead of helping to find some way to free them back to their native homelands.

 

[Daniyel]

They'll just blow everything up, they did it before and they'll do it again.
Report: Palestinians set to nullify Oslo Accords

Palestinians lived in peace before the zionist's took over their country by immigrants, such as your self, Daniyel from Morocco

The Arabs didn't live peacefully.
Since they launched countless attacks on Jews even prior to1800 that were unable to defend themselves nevertheless retaliate - that's not the definition of Palestinians living peacefully, correct?
I'm from NYC btw.

 

[Hollie]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

Well the illegal immigrants to Palestine forced the Arab population to abandon and give up their lands to the illegal jewish immigrants

The illegal immigrants in Palestine were the Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese arab beggars and squatters.

Yes but those Zionists in Israel are guilty of allowing the squatters to remain instead of helping to find some way to free them back to their native homelands.

Irony, like sarcasm, are among the most ingenious literary devices ever.

 

[MJB12741]

There is no doubt that the UN membership is going to vote to free Palestine at least on paper until Israel caves in to the universal pressure through boycotts for Israel to remove its occupation of Palestine...



“Resolution 242 Revisited”: new research on Security Council’s approach to Israel-Arab conflict

"...France will reportedly soon introduce a new proposed resolution about the Israeli-Arab conflict in the Council. President Obama has repeatedly hinted that he might not veto such a resolution.

One thing the paper makes clear is that Res. 242 represented a territorial compromise, with accommodations to Arab and Israel positions. The French resolution – which mandates a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice Lines – would specifically undo the parts of that compromise that were in Israel’s favor, and essentially “reverse” 242, replacing it with the resolution demanded by the U.S.S.R and Arab states in 1967. If the U.S. allows this to happen, it would be a fundamental reversal of 50 years of Middle East diplomacy..."

Which would be an illegal action under the UN charter so will get no votes. Obama can say what he wants he no longer has any say in the matter and the US representative will decide what is best for all concerned. The Palestinians have accepted 242 and have promised to work within its framework, yet have refused to do so since making that promise. let the UN try and force a nation to give up its lands and it will find it loses many of its oldest members, and its place in Washington.

Well the illegal immigrants to Palestine forced the Arab population to abandon and give up their lands to the illegal jewish immigrants

The illegal immigrants in Palestine were the Egyptian, Syrian and Lebanese arab beggars and squatters.

Yes but those Zionists in Israel are guilty of allowing the squatters to remain instead of helping to find some way to free them back to their native homelands.

Irony, like sarcasm, are among the most ingenious literary devices ever.

Add some satire to get the message across to the imbeciles & I agree.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

They'll just blow everything up, they did it before and they'll do it again.
Report: Palestinians set to nullify Oslo Accords

Palestinians lived in peace before the zionist's took over their country by immigrants, such as your self, Daniyel from Morocco

The Arabs didn't live peacefully.
Since they launched countless attacks on Jews even prior to1800 that were unable to defend themselves nevertheless retaliate - that's not the definition of Palestinians living peacefully, correct?
I'm from NYC btw.

Really, you made Aliyah from NYC? I thought you were an Israeli Sabra.