'Palestinian'
- Thread starter abu afak
- Start date
Hossfly
ZIONIST
Ach, Du lieber Gott, the beloved little Schatzi of the Nazi Bund which meets in the Yorkville section of Manhattan is calling someone Mrs. Gestapo!!! If Skitzo had only been born sooner, he would gladly have joined up with the Gestapo during World War II so that he could have had a chance to round up the Jews. Meanwhile, let me re-post what a retired State Department employee said.
Sure there was a Palestine. It was invented in the 1960s in a conference room at 1 Lubyanka, Dzershinsky Place, Red Square, Moscow, CCCP. It came complete with a "Palestinian people" too. In fact, its legacy leader was trained east of Moscow at the legendary Balashikha special-ops school.
Is this author and website ever going to be attacked? How dare they make such an assertion? It goes against everything the anti-Israel forces have been saying since the '40s. Next thing you know, they will claim the area is such a mess because of outside forces (Israel) and not their own corruption and ineptitude.
They are a mix of Jordanians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Syrian, Sudanese etc. who settled within the area known as the British Mandate of Palestine. This land encompassed 43,000 square miles and was promised to the Jews as a national homeland in the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Yet, in 1922 the British turned over 75% of it to create the nation of Transjordan, (today’s Jordan). This left roughly 25% or 11,000 square miles of land to be dealt with.
In 1947 the British decided to leave the area and turned the issue over to the United Nations, which by a 72% majority voted to partition two separate states, one Jewish and one Arab. However, the surrounding Arab nations rejected the vote and attacked the new Jewish state one day after its independence, intending to destroy it. This is all indisputable fact.
Much more of this heretical essay @ Articles: 'Palestinian' Is a Fabricated Nationality
They are a mix of Jordanians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Syrian, Sudanese etc. who settled within the area known as the British Mandate of Palestine. This land encompassed 43,000 square miles and was promised to the Jews as a national homeland in the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Yet, in 1922 the British turned over 75% of it to create the nation of Transjordan, (today’s Jordan). This left roughly 25% or 11,000 square miles of land to be dealt with.
In 1947 the British decided to leave the area and turned the issue over to the United Nations, which by a 72% majority voted to partition two separate states, one Jewish and one Arab. However, the surrounding Arab nations rejected the vote and attacked the new Jewish state one day after its independence, intending to destroy it. This is all indisputable fact.
Much more of this heretical essay @ Articles: 'Palestinian' Is a Fabricated Nationality
Sorry, clueless. "Pal'istanians" as a national identity was the invention of Yassir Arafat back in the late 1960's.
You need to stick with cutting and pasting cartoons.
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,337
- 3,680
- 290
"Palestinian" is a fabricated nationality. But so were all nationalities at the time of their coming into being. It doesn't matter how or when a nationality is created -- once it is that nationality, and the people who it belongs, has just as much right to it as any other nationality. None of us gets to choose which nationalities are "valid" and which are not. Its the self-defining that matters.
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
All nationalities are fabricated.
louie888
Gold Member
- Oct 24, 2016
- 3,811
- 375
- 190
- Banned
- #270
Yes, Arafat was behind this grand conspiracy that dated from centuries before Christ.
The discovery of a Philistine cemetery in Israel that was there centuries before Christ
You really need a new conspiracy theory to wrap your mind around as this one is clearly dead.
The discovery of a Philistine cemetery in Israel that was there centuries before Christ
You really need a new conspiracy theory to wrap your mind around as this one is clearly dead.
You're confused. It's been gone over in excruciating detail but your confusion is expected. Pal'istan was a geographic area. There was never a "country of Pali'land" as you and others would believe.
You need a new conspiracy theory to maintain your delusions.
fncceo
Diamond Member
- Nov 29, 2016
- 47,407
- 42,003
- 3,615
Not so much fabricated as redefined in the case of Palestinians.
The term Palestinian has had many definitions over the millennia. Originally the Greek word for the Kingdom of Israel during the Hellenic Period. It was used by the Romans to refer to the Kingdom of Judea, by the Turks and Franks to refer to the occupants of region in general, and during the British Mandate of Palestine, the term referred to any resident of the region .. regardless of religion, race, or ethnicity. Jews were Palestinians, as were Copts and Arabs and anyone else living there.
It wasn't until the rise of a Palestinian resistance movement (separate from the Arab States) that the term Palestinian took on it's current definition of Arab only.
So, to say there was never a nation called Palestine isn't technically true. Palestine did exist as a sovereign Jewish nation from the 2nd Century BCE until the Roman Conquest of culminating in 70CE. Since then, until 1948, the region called Palestine was territory occupied for centuries by a dozen different kingdoms, not sovereign, but the territory of those kingdoms. The people in it were, for all that time, referred to as 'Palestinians'.
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,478
- 4,888
- 1,815
1960's? Israel's usual bullshit.
------------------------
The automatic, ipso facto, change from Ottoman to Palestinian nationality was dealt with in Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Citizenship Order, which declared:
“Turkish subjects habitually resident in the territory of Palestine upon the 1st day of August, 1925, shall become Palestinian citizens.”
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,337
- 3,680
- 290
Geographical designation, not nationality arising from a distinct people. As evidenced by the ensuing conflict. There was certainly a Jewish nationality at the time. But in the 1920's there was no specific Arab Palestinian nationality as distinct from general regional Arab nationality.
Had there been no Jewish influence at all, it seems to me that the Palestinians would have had no cause to differentiate themselves from Syria and/or Jordan, but would have contentedly joined one or the other. Easily evidenced by the common assertion from Palestinians that there is no difference between them and their neighboring Syrians and Jordanians.
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem was an independent state in Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital. There is not much to differentiate a Colombian from a Panamanian, yet they are separate nationalities. Same for Tunisia and Libya. However, the people of Palestine were different enough from the surrounding people (a large Christian population) so that the Ottomans created the Kudus Special District (encompassing Palestine) ruled directly from Istanbul rather than from the Syrian administrative district.
Was that after the invasion by the colonizing xtian Crusaders?
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 86,478
- 4,888
- 1,815
Indeed, and it was all settled after WWI when everyone living there (Muslims, Christians, and Jews) became citizens of the new state.
ForeverYoung436
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 6,050
- 1,228
- 245
What hypocricy by monte!! The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem was a legal country but not the modern state of Israel? The current Jews are colonizers but the Christian Crusaders were not?
As for your other assertion, Lebanon was separated from Syria because of its large Christian population (which the Muslims have since decimated), but that was not the case with Palestine.
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
Where have I said that the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem was a legal state and Israel is not? You must be confusing me with someone else.
The Crusaders were not settler colonists, they arrived to rule over the existing native inhabitants, like the Arabs and Romans did. The Zionists expelled the native inhabitants, to settle their population there. There is a difference.
Palestine had a large Christian population before the Zionists arrived, as many as 20% were Christian. And, the Kudus Special District (Palestine) was ruled directly from Istanbul, unlike Syria. It's just an historical fact.
Lebanon was split from Syria by the French, not the Ottomans, get your history straight.
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,337
- 3,680
- 290
Wait, what?! Ruling over the existing native inhabitants is legit? Cool. Then you can no longer complain about "apartheid". Jew rule, as you call it, is totally legit, right?
Similar threads
- Poll
- Locked
New Topics
-
CA Democrats Push Bill Banning ICE Agents From Working In CA- Started by mudwhistle
- Replies: 4
-
-
-
-
