Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
✧ Declassified A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948• The Arabs of Palestine will never recognise the validity of the extorted partition recommendations or the authority of the United Nations to make them.• The Arabs of Palestine consider that any attempt by the Jews or any power group of powers to establish a Jewish state in Arab territory is an act of aggression which will be resisted in self-defense.• The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)A must read. Thanks for the link.
Declassified A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948
What part of this do you disagree with? It merely asserts the Palestinian's rights particularly the right to territorial integrity.
(c) General Carlos P. Romulo, Head of the Philippines delegation, on Wednesday made a very strong and courageous speech denouncing partition declaring: “At the behest of my Government, the Philippine Republic regrets its inability to approve of or participate in a solution of the Palestine problem that would involve the encouragement of political disunion and the enforcement of measures that would amount to the territorial mutilation of the Holy Land.’But on Saturday and in the absence of General Romulo there were two Philippines Delegates, each claiming different instructions — one to vote against partition as instructed by the head of his delegation, the other supporting partition according to fresh instructions from his Government. It is an established fact that strong pressure was put on the Philippines Government by the United States Government and, according to reliable information, the United States Government threatened the Philippines Government that it will not grant it the loan it is asking for if its delegation fails to support partition. In this way the Arabs lost the Philippines vote.
This speaks for itself.
(COMMENT)For years you have been dancing around the issue of whose territorial integrity is being violated.✦ Every State has the duty to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
Interesting opinion.RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
(COMMENT)For years you have been dancing around the issue of whose territorial integrity is being violated.✦ Every State has the duty to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
Well, you cannot say that the Arab Palestinians had any territorial integrity.
I think I explained several times that the Arab Palestinians did not have any territory.
Most Respectfully,
R
This speaks for itself.
Sure, I Posted a quote with the link to the document.This speaks for itself.
Because you used bolded text?
Do you have anything to back that up?
Another UN opinion? That only speaks to an opinion.Sure, I Posted a quote with the link to the document.This speaks for itself.
Because you used bolded text?
Do you have anything to back that up?
✦ Every State has the duty to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
For years you have been dancing around the issue of whose territorial integrity is being violated.
Well, you cannot say that the Arab Palestinians had any territorial integrity.
I think I explained several times that the Arab Palestinians did not have any territory.
(COMMENT)Interesting opinion.
Do you have anything to back that up?
The people.RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
(QUESTION)
What faction of Arab Palestinians are you following?
Most Respectfully,
R
So says foreigners.In February 1948, Palestine was a legal entity but it is not a sovereign state.
Who then? The Allied powers had a non annexation policy. So it was not going to be theirs.Honestly, I do not... I cannot prove that the Arab Palestinians did not get the territory by default.
The land area you call Pal’istan belonged to the Ottoman Turks. They released all rights and title to the British Mandate.What pretzel logic would make you believe that Palestine did not belong to the Palestinians?
The land area you call Pal’istan belonged to the Ottoman Turks. They released all rights and title to the British Mandate.What pretzel logic would make you believe that Palestine did not belong to the Palestinians?
Pal’istan never belonged to any group you call Pal’istanians.
Your re-writing of history doesn’t change history.
No they didn't. The Mandates had a no annexation policy.They released all rights and title to the British Mandate.
You’re terribly confused. The Mandatory never annexed any property.The land area you call Pal’istan belonged to the Ottoman Turks. They released all rights and title to the British Mandate.What pretzel logic would make you believe that Palestine did not belong to the Palestinians?
Pal’istan never belonged to any group you call Pal’istanians.
Your re-writing of history doesn’t change history.No they didn't. The Mandates had a no annexation policy.They released all rights and title to the British Mandate.
Who then?We’re still at the place where you don’t understand that the land area you refer to as Pal’istan never belonged to any group you call Pal’istanians.
The land area you call Pal’istan was controlled by the Ottoman Turks. They released all rights and title to the Mandatory.Who then?We’re still at the place where you don’t understand that the land area you refer to as Pal’istan never belonged to any group you call Pal’istanians.
Link?
